Abstract
In studying human political acts, actions, interactions, and their attendant language and material culture, can the researcher generate understanding from a point external to that which is being studied? It is this sort of question that has driven the development of what are increasingly becoming known as “interpretive research methods“ (Yanow/Schwartz-Shea 2006a), influenced by the so-called interpretive turn within the social sciences over the last several decades (e.g., Burrell/Morgan 1979, Rabinow/Sullivan 1979, 1985, Hiley et al. 1991), itself drawing on earlier 20 century philosophies — phenomenology, hermeneutics, (some) critical theory, ethnomethodology, symbolic interactionism, and pragmatism. Answering the question in the negative, these ways of knowing political life argue, instead, that researchers’ understandings come about through the vehicle of their own essential humanity. A phenomenologically-informed constructivist ontology and an interpretive epistemology informed by hermeneutics combine in support of a subjectivist methodology: that is, a position that argues that “knowers“ (researchers and participants) and what is known are both situated in specific historical and cultural contexts, such that objective knowledge — by definition, that obtained from some external vantage point — is not possible (for a more detailed discussion, see Yanow 2006b). Such a position has led to several other “turns“ — the linguistic turn (e.g., Rorty 1967, Van Maanen 1995), the rhetorical turn (e.g., McCloskey 1985), the narrative turn (see Stone 1979), the historic turn (McDonald 1996), the metaphorical turn (Lorenz 1998), the argumentative turn (Fischer/Forester 1993), the cultural turn (Bonnell/Hunt 1999), even the practice turn (Schatzki/ Knorr Cetina/Von Savigny 2001) — all of them engaging questions of not only what meanings are at play in the situations under study, but how policy, organizational, and other political meanings are made and conveyed among various actors in the situation, including the researcher herself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adcock, Robert (2006): Generalization in comparative and historical social science: The difference that interpre-tivism makes. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (eds.): 50–66.
Berger, Peter L./ Luckmann, Thomas (1966): The social construction of reality. New York.
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976): The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia.
Bonnell, Victoria E./ Hunt, Lynn (eds.) (1999): Beyond the cultural turn. Berkeley.
Brandwein, Pamela (1999): Reconstructing reconstruction: The supreme court and the production of historical truth. Durham.
Brandwein, Pamela (2006): Studying the careers of knowledge claims: Applying science studies to legal studies. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (eds.): 228–243.
Burrell, Gibson/ Morgan, Gareth (1979): Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Exeter.
Clifford, James (1986): Introduction. In: Clifford, James/ Marcus, George E. (eds.): 1–26.
Clifford, James/ Marcus, George E. (Hrsg.) (1986): Writing culture. Berkeley.
Dallmayr, Fred R./ McCarthy, Thomas A. (Hrsg.) (1977): Understanding and social inquiry. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
Erlandson, David A./ Harris, Edward L./ Skipper, Barbara L./ Allen, Steve D. (1993): Doing naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park.
Fay, Brian (1975): Social theory and political practice. Boston.
Filmer, Paul/ Phillipson, Michael/ Silverman, David/ Walsh, David (1972): New directions in sociological theory. London.
Fischer, Frank/ Forester, John (Hrsg.) (1993): The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1976): Philosophical hermeneutics. (trans. and ed. by David E. Linge). Berkeley.
Gans, Herbert (1976): Personal journal: B. On the methods used in this study. In: Golden, M. Patricia (Hrsg.): 49–59.
Garfinkel, Harold (1977): What is ethnomethodology? In: Dallmayr, Fred R./ McCarthy, Thomas A. (Hrsg.): 240–261.
Geertz, Clifford (1973): The interpretation of cultures. New York.
Ginger, Clare (2006): Interpretive content analysis: Stories and arguments in analytic documents. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 331–48.
Goffman, Erving (1959): The presentation of self in everyday life. New York.
Golden, M. Patricia (Hrsg.) (1976): The research experience. Itasca.
Goodman, Nelson (1978): Ways of world-making. Indianapolis.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. (1988): Theoretical issues in policy analysis. Albany.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. (2006): Contending conceptions of science and politics: Methodology and the constitution of the political. Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 27–49.
Hiley, David R./ Bohman, James F./ Shusterman, Richard, (Hrsg.) (1991): The interpretive turn. Ithaca.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006a): Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the west. Ann Arbor.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006b): Making sense of making sense: Configurational analysis and the double hermeneutic. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 264–280.
King, Gary/ Keohane, Robert O./ Verba, Sidney (1994): Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970): The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago (Second edition).
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lorenz, Chris (1998): Can histories be true? Narrativism, positivism, and the’ metaphorical turn.’ In: History and Theory 37: 309–30.
Lynch, Cecelia (2006): Critical interpretation and interwar peace movements: Challenging dominant narratives. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 291–99
Maynard-Moody, Steven/ Musheno, Michael (2006): Stories for research. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 316–30.
McCloskey, Donald N. (1985) The rhetoric of economics. Madison.
McDonald, Terrence J. (Hrsg.) (1996): The historic turn in the human sciences. Ann Arbor.
McHenry, Jr., Dean E. (2006): The numeration of events: Studying political protest in India. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 187–202.
Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.) (2005): Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven.
Oren, Ido (2006): Political science as history: A reflexive approach. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 215–27.
Pachirat, Timothy (2007): The political in political ethnography: Reflections from an industrialized slaughter-house on perspective, power, and sight. In: Schatz, Edward (Hrsg.): manuscript under review.
Pader, Ellen J. (2002): Housing occupancy standards: Inscribing ethnicity and family relations on the land. In: Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 19: 300–18.
Pader, Ellen J. (2006): Seeing with an ethnographic sensibility: Explorations beneath the surface of public policies. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 161–75.
Rabinow, Paul/ Sullivan, William M. (Hrsg.): (1979, 1985): Interpretive social science. Berkeley (1 and 2 editions).
Ricoeur, Paul (1971): The model of the text. In: Social Research 38:529–562.
Rorty, Richard (1967): The linguisitic turn. Chicago.
Rorty, Richard (1979): Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles (1998): Democracy in translation: Understanding politics in an unfamiliar culture. Ithaca.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles (2006): Ordinary language interviewing. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 150–60.
Schatz, Edward (Hrsg.): Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power. Ms. under review.
Schatzki, Theodore R./ Knorr Cetina, Karin/ Von Savigny, Eike (Hrsg.) (2001): The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York.
Schmidt, Sr., Ronald (2006): Value-critical policy analysis: The case of language policy in the United States. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 300–15.
Schram, Sanford (2006): Making political science matter: Debating knowledge, research and method. New York.
Schütz, Alfred (1967): The phenomenology of the social world. Chicago.
Schütz, Alfred (1973): Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. Collected papers, vol. 1, ed. Maurice Natanson, 48–66. The Hague.
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (2006): Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 89–113.
Shapiro, Ian (2002): Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or: What’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. In: Political Theory 30: 596–619.
Shehata, Samer (2003): In the basha’s house: The organizational culture of Egyptian public-sector enterprise. In: International Journal of Middle East Studies 35: 103–132.
Shehata, Samer (2006): Ethnography, identity, and the production of knowledge. In Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 244–263.
Soss, Joe (2000): Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the U.S. welfare system. Ann Arbor.
Soss, Joe (2006): Talking our way to meaningful explanations: A practice-centered view of interviewing for interpretive research. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 127–49.
Stone, Lawrence (1979): The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. In: Past and Present 85: 3–24.
Taylor, Charles (1971): Interpretation and the sciences of man. In: Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.
Van Maanen, John (1995): Style as theory. In: Organization Science 6: 133–143.
Weldes, Jutta (2006): High politics and low data: Globalization discourses and popular culture. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 176–86.
Yanow, Dvora (1996): How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington.
Yanow, Dvora (2000): Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Newbury Park.
Yanow, Dvora (2006a): Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 5–26.
Yanow, Dvora (2006b): Neither rigorous nor objective? Interrogating criteria for knowledge claims in interpretive science. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 67–88.
Yanow, Dvora (2006c): How built spaces mean: A semiotics of space. In: Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): 349–66.
Yanow, Dvora (2007): Reading as method: Interpreting interpretations. In: Edward Schatz (Hrsg.): manuscript under review.
Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.) (2006a): Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk.
Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (2006b): What’s “interpretive“ about interpretive methods? Introduction to:Yanow, Dvora/ Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Hrsg.): xi–xxvii.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yanow, D. (2009). Interpretive Ways of Knowing in the Study of Politics. In: Pickel, S., Pickel, G., Lauth, HJ., Jahn, D. (eds) Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_21
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16194-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91826-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)