The Nature of European Issues: Conceptual Clarifications and Some Empirical Evidence

  • Hermann Schmitt

Abstract

Issues are at the core of the political process.1 In a democracy at least, people need to be able to know of them and to participate in decision-making and the political deliberations about them (Dahl 1998). This paper aims at clarifying the nature of European issues. The reader might wonder why one could be concerned about this topic. However, there is a widespread misconception in much of the literature and in public discourse. According to that, European issues are those that are “about” Europe. I argue, however, that European issues are all those that are subject to EU legislation, no matter whether they are about, say, the future decisionmaking rules in the European Council or unemployment. This conceptual stretch has important implications for analyses of the democratic quality of the EU political process.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andeweg, Rudy B., 1995: The Reshaping of National Party Systems. In: West European Politics 18, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chari, Raj S./Sylvia Kritzinger, 2006: Understanding EU Policy Making. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dahl, Robert, 1998: On Democracy. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, Anthony, 1957: An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Fuchs, Dieter, 2000: Demos und Nation in der Europäischen Union. In: Hans-Dieter Klingemann/ Friedhelm Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Zur Zukunft der Demokratie. Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  6. Hooghe, Lisbeth/Gary Marks, 2001: Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Lindberg, Leon N./Stuart A. Scheingold, 1970: Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Neidhart, Friedhelm, 1994: Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Neidhart, Friedhelm/Ruud Koopmans/ Barbara Pfetsch, 2000: Konstitutionsbedingungen politischer Öffentlichkeit: Der Fall Europa. In: Hans-Dieter Klingemann/ Friedhelm Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Zur Zukunft der Demokratie. Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  10. Rabinowitz, George/Stuart Elaine Macdonald, 1989: A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. In: American Political Science Review 83(1), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1999: Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Schmitt, Hermann, 2001: Politische Repräsentation in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  13. Schmitt, Hermann/ Matthew Loveless, 2006: The European Election Study 2004. Google Scholar
  14. Schmitt, Hermann/ Angelika Scheuer, 1996: Region — Nation — Europa. Drei Ebenen politischer Steue-rung und Gestaltung in der Wahrnehmung der Bürger. In: Elmar Rieger et al. (Hrsg.), Das Europäische Mehrebenensystem. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  15. Schmitt, Hermann/ Jacques Thomassen, 1999: Distinctiveness and Cohesion of Political Parties. In: Hermann Schmitt/ Jacques Thomassen (Hrsg.), Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Stokes, Donald, 1966: Spatial Models of Party Competition. In: Angus Campbell et al. (Hrsg.), Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Thomassen, Jacques/Hermann Schmitt, 2004: Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union. In: Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 45(1), 377–410.Google Scholar
  18. Van der Eijk, Cees/Mark Franklin, 2004: Potential for Contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: Gary Marks/ Marco R. Steenbergen (Hrsg.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Van der Eijk, Cees/ Mark Franklin/ Michael Marsh, 1996: Conclusions: The Electoral Connection and the Democratic Deficit. In: Cees Van der Eijk/ Mark Franklin (Hrsg.), Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zaller, John R./ Stanley Feldman, 1992: A Simple Theory of the Survey Response. Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. In: American Journal of Political Science 36, 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann Schmitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität MannheimDeutschalnd

Personalised recommendations