Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Von der Beratung zur Verhandlung – Der Fall IPCC

  • Chapter
Organisationen der Forschung

Im Frühjahr 2007 war der Klimawandel als Thema und der „Weltklimarat“ als Beratungsinstanz nicht mehr von den Titelseiten der nationalen und internationalen Zeitungen wegzudenken. Was bei der Gründung des Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1988 noch unvorstellbar war, sind folgende Sachverhalte: die Veröffentlichungen seiner Sachstandsberichte (Assessment Report) landen regelmäßig auf den Titelseiten der nationalen und internationalen Presse (von „Bild“ über die „Süddeutsche“ hin zur „New York Times“). Gleichzeitig rückt der Klimawandel in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung zum Menschheitsproblem Nummer eins auf und wird zu einem Thema von höchster politischer Priorität, vergleichbar mit Themen wie Wirtschaftswachstum und Energieversorgung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Agrawala, Shardul (1998a): Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Climatic Change 39. 621-642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala, Shardul (1998b): Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Climatic Change 39. 605-620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala, Shardul (1999): Early science-policy interactions in climate change: lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. In: Global Environmental Change 9. 157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann, Gotthard/Beck, Silke (2003): Gesellschaft als Kontext von Forschung. Neue Formen der Produktion und Integration von Wissen - Klimamodellierung zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik. Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA 6805. Karlsruhe: Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Silke (2004): Localizing Global Change in Germany. In: Jasanoff/Martello (2004): 173-194

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich (1996): Wissen oder Nicht-Wissen? Zwei Perspektiven „reflexiver Modernisierung“. In: Beck et al. (1996): 289–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich et al. (1996): Reflexive Modernisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja (1996): Politischer Druck bei der Formierung eines wissenschaftlichen Konsenses. In: Emsley (1996): 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, Bert (1994): Science and Policy Making. In: Ambio 23. 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N. (1996): Global Comprehensive Models in Politics and Policymaking. In: Climatic Change 32. 149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N. (1999): Global Climate Science, Uncertainty and Politics: Data-Laden Models, Model Filtered Data. In: Science as Culture 8. 437–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N./Miller, Clark A. (Hrsg.) (2001): Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N./Schneider, Stephen H. (2001): Self-Governance and Peer Review in Science-For-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report. In: Edwards/ Miller (2001): 219–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Aant (1996): Shaping Worldwide Consensus: The Orchestration of Global Change Research. In: Elzinga/Landström (1996): 223–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Aant/Landström, Catharina (Hrsg.): Internationalism and Science. London (u. a.): Taylor Graham

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsley, John (Hrsg.) (1996): Die Klima-Diskussion. Der Bericht des europäischen Forums für Wissenschaft und Umwelt. Boournemuth: Bourne

    Google Scholar 

  • EUR 22700 (2007): Science & Governance — Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. (1999): Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, Reiner (2006): Ozone and Climate: Scientific Consensus and Leadership. In: Science, Technology & Human Values 31. 73-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David (2001): Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. In: Science, Technology & Human Values 26. 399-408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha-Duong, Minh/Swart, Rob/Petersen, Arthur/Bernstein, Lenny (2007): Editorial: Uncertainty management in the IPCC: Agreeing to disagree. In: Global Environmental Change 17. 8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter M. (1992): Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. In: International Organization 46. 1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1999): Procedures for the Preparation, Review, Acceptance, Adoption, Approval and Publication of IPCC Reports. Annex to the Report on the 15 th Session of the IPCC. San José

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001): Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/un/syreng/spm.pdf, letzter Aufruf: 14.06.2006

  • Japp, Klaus-Peter (1999): Die Unterscheidung von Nichtwissen. In: TA-Datenbank- Nachrichten 8. 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila (1990): The Fifth Branch. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila (1992): Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA. In: Osiris 7. 195-217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila/Wynne Brian (1998): Science and Decisionmaking. In: Rayner/Malone (1998): 1-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila/Martello, Marybeth L. (Hrsg.) (2004): Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Melissa/Scoones, Ian/Wynne, Brian (Hrsg.) (2005): Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand, Eva (2007): Pure Science or Policy Involvement? Ambiguous Boundary- Work for Swedish Carbon Cycle Science. In: Environmental Science and Policy 10. 39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, Michel et al. (2006): Diversity without Representation. In: Nature 442. 245-246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1990): Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Clark A. (2001). Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. In: Science, Technology & Human Values 26. 478-500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Clark A./Erickson, Paul H. (2006): The Politics of Bridging Scales and Epistemologies: Science and Democracy in Global Environmental Governance. In: Reid et al. (2006): 279-314

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald B./Clark, William C./Cash, David W./Dickson, Nancy M. (Hrsg.) (2006): Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Richard H. (2000): Ready for IPCC-2001: Innovation and Change in Plans for the IPCC Third Assessment Report. In: Climatic Change 45. 459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Richard H. (2007): Editorial - Improving information for managing an uncertain future climate. In: Global Environmental Change 17. 4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi (2004): Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? In: Environmental Science & Policy 7. 369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke Jr., Roger A. (2005): Misdefining ‘Climate Change’: Consequences for Science and Action. In: Environmental Science & Policy 8. 548-561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, Steve/Malone, Elizabeth L. (Hrsg.) (1998): Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. 1: The Societal Framework. Colombus: Battelle Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Walter V./Berkes, Fikret/Wilbanks, Thomas/Capistrano, Doris (Hrsg.) (2006): Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems. Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrope, Mark (2001): Consensus science, or consensus politics? In: Nature 412. 112- 114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, Simon/Wynne, Brian (1996): Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. In: Science, Technology & Human Values 21. 275-302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skodvin, Tora (1999): Science-policy Interaction in the Global Greenhouse. Cicero Working Paper No. 3. Oslo: Cicero

    Google Scholar 

  • Skodvin, Tora (2000) Revised Rules of Procedure for the IPCC Process. In: Climatic Change 46. 409-415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluijs, Jeroen van der/Eijndhoven, Josée van/Shackley, Simon/Wynne, Brian (1998): Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus around Climate Sensitivity. In: Social Studies of Science 28. 291-323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluijs, Jeroen van der (2005): Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. In: Water Science & Technology 52. 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andrew (2005): Opening Up or Closing Down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In: Leach et al. (2005): 218-231

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Robert T. (2005): Turning Science into Policy: Challenges and Experiences from the Science-Policy Interface. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360. 471-477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, Peter (1999): Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability – Paradoxes of Science in Politics. In: Science and Public Policy 26. 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, Peter (2001): Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Weilerswist: Velbrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, Stephen (2005): Comparative boundary work: US acid rain and global climate change policy deliberations. In: Science and Public Policy 32. 445-456

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Silke Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Jost Halfmann Falk Schützenmeister

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beck, S. (2009). Von der Beratung zur Verhandlung – Der Fall IPCC. In: Halfmann, J., Schützenmeister, F. (eds) Organisationen der Forschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91639-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91639-2_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15789-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91639-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation