Abstract
This chapter tests our claim that LeibnizSystem finds the best available model to separate successfully and unsuccessfully implemented directives, just by using factors from the design phase. We compare LeibnizSystem results to that of a binary logistic regression, and find that, in general, LeibnizSystem yields considerably better results than the regression. Therefore, the Low-Scenario remains the best model and our conclusions from the previous chapters hold.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The Score Test is based on the distribution theory of the derivatives of the log likelihood (Hosmer & Lemeshow 2000, p.16).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Comparing Results to Regression Results. In: Implementing Climate Change Measures in the EU. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91328-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91328-5_9
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16251-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91328-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)