Skip to main content

Anhang

  • Chapter
  • 1001 Accesses

Auszug

Der Volltext der transkribierten Interviews (ca. 300 Seiten) liegt den Betreuern der Dissertation Prof. Dr. Hans J. Kleinsteuber und Prof. Dr. Uwe Hasebrink auf CDROM vor. Eine Weitergabe ist nicht möglich, um die den Interviewpartnern zugesicherte Anonymität zu wahren. Hier folgt exemplarisch der Fragebogen für ein Interview mit Beamten der Kommissionsvertretung in Paris. Die Leitfäden der Interviews mit Beamten in Brüssel, mit Regierungsvertretern oder PR-Fachleuten, mussten natürlich entsprechend angepasst werden. Die Fragen sind überwiegend als Stichworte formuliert, was ein Ablesen der Fragen während des Interviews verhindern soll. Dem Interview ging in jedem Fall ein E-Mail-Wechsel oder ein Telefonat voraus, in dem der Forschungskontext erläutert wurde.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Arning, Matthias (2004): „Die Wertebasis Europas ist Toleranz“. Erweiterungskommissar Günter Verheugen findet die Debatteüber den EU-Beitritt der Türkei verengt. In: Frankfurter Rundschau, 05.06.2004, 6. URL: http://www.spd-hessensued.de/europa/presse/pe/04-06-03b.html (28.01. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Augstein, Franziska (2004): Dieser Kontinent braucht eine gemeinsame Verteidigung. „Es gibt einen gefährlichen Mangel an europäischem Bekennermut“: Ein Gespräch mit Günter Verheugen, dem neuen EU-Industriekommissar. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 22.11.2004, 13. URL: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/ausland/artikel/428/43385/print.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbalk, Ottmar/ Bommersheim, Martin (2004): „Das Ziel heißt Jobs, Jobs, Jobs“. In: Focus, 27.12.2004, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbalk, Ottmar/ Bommersheim, Martin (2004): „Bescheidenheit tut jetzt gut“. In: Focus, 05.01.2004, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolesch, Cornelia/ Hagelüken, Alexandra (2003): „Ich bitte um Fairness für Polen“. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 05.11.2003, 9. URL: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/ausland/artikel/911/20891/ (28.01. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolesch, Cornelia/ Hagelüken, Alexandra/ Wernicke, Christian (2005): „Ohne Erweiterung wäre alles viel schlechter“. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 14.06.2005, 9. URL: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/ausland/ schwerpunkt/786/9777/9/index.html/ausland/artikel/828/54774/article.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brössler, Daniel/ Ulrich, Stefan (2004): Verheugen: Viele Polen haben wieder Angst vor den Deutschen. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 11.02.2004, 8. URL: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/ausland/artikel/ 495/26469/ (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Escher, Georg (2004): „Die Sorgen sind gegenstandslos“. In: Nürnberger Nachrichten, 30.01.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escher, Georg (2005): „Die Probleme haben nichts mit Europa zu tun“. In: Nürnberger Nachrichten, 11.05.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halusa, Martin (2005): „Der Abstand zu den USA wird größer“. Der neue EU-Industriekommissar Günter Verheugen ist mit den Fortschritten Europas nicht zufrieden. In: Die Welt, 02.02.2005, 12. URL: http://www.welt.de/data/2005/02/02/457313.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaserer, Waltraud (2004): „Wachstum hat absolute Priorität“. Günter Verheugen soll in Brüssel Vize-Kommissionspräsident für Wirtschaft werden. Ein Gesprächüber neue Strukturen sowie Unterstützung und Widerstände. In: Welt am Sonntag, 04.07.2004, 4. URL: http://www.wams.de/data/ 2004/07/04/300594.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuf, Thorsten/ Schellenberger, Rouven (2005): „Der Kapitalismus hat auch ein hässliches Gesicht“. EU-Kommissar Günter Verheugenüber die Verantwortung der Wirtschaft, Lohndumping und CSU-Chef Edmund Stoiber. In: Berliner Zeitung, 27.04.2005, 10. URL: http://www.berlinonline. de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2005/0427/wirtschaft/0002/index.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Dirk (2001): „Gürtel, Hosenträger, Fallschirm“. In: Der Spiegel, 23.04.2001, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimm, Roland/ Quatremer, Jean (2000): Dans la grande Europe, l’Allemagne devra modérer ses ambitions. In: Liberation, 22.12.2000, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leparmentier, Arnaud (2003): Trois questions à ⋯ Günter Verheugen. In: Le Monde, 11.03.2003, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, Eckart/ Wehner, Markus (2004): „Die Ukraine würde unsüberfordern“. EU-Industriekommissar Günter Verheugenüber Automobilbau, den Kanzler, Europas Grenzen und eine Kulturrevolution in der Türkei. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 05.12.2004. URL: http://www.faz.net/s/Rub99C3EECA60D84C08AD6B3E60C4EA807F/Doc~EA0DD9C8929 D54B73986925AE3B61D841~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, Gerhard (2004): „Die Stimmung könnte enthusiastischer sein“. In: Wirtschaftsblatt, 09.04.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, Manfred (2004): „Ich seheüberhaupt keine Verlierer“. In: Passauer Neue Presse, 08.04.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Fred (2001): „Es gibt kein Zurück“. In: FACTS, 29.03.2001, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2000): „Das Volk sollüber die EU-Erweiterung entscheiden“. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 02.09.2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2001): „Die Risiken sind beherrschbar“. In: General-Anzeiger, 21.05.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2001): „Was da auf uns zukommt, ist absolut beherrschbar“. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 21.03.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2001): „Die Elite muss auf die Straße“. In: Focus, 18.06.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2001): „Ich war und bin für weniger Sperrfristen“. In: Focus, 23.04.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2002): „Die Bedingungen werden nicht abgeschwächt“. EU-Kommissar Günter Verheugen sieht Chancen für den Beitritt von zehn Kandidaten im Jahr 2004. In: Frankfurter Rundschau, 16.01.2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2002): „Politischer Preis wäre zu hoch“. In: Focus, 01.07.2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2003): „Wir können uns nicht den Luxus von 25 Armeen leisten“. In: General-Anzeiger, 08.04.2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2004): „In der Erweiterung liegt eine gewaltige Chance“. In: General Anzeiger, 01.05.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • o.A. (2004): „Wir dürfen die Türken nicht aussperren“. In: Stuttgarter Zeitung, 10.01.2004, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberger, Rouven (2003): „Ich halte das für einen schweren Rückschlag“. EU-Kommissar Verheugen über die Irak-Politik der USA und die Zerstrittenheit der Europäer. In: Berliner Zeitung, 20.03.2003, 7. URL: http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2003/ 0320/politik/0008/index.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlamp, Hans-Jürgen/ Koch, Dirk (2004): „Probleme beim Vollzug“. In: Der Spiegel, 18.10.2004, 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slangen, Christoph (2005): „Deutschland hat alle Mittel, das Problem zu lösen“. EU-Kommissar Günter Verheugen weist Kritik an Billig-Konkurrenz aus Osteuropa zurück. In: Wiesbadener Kurier, 02.04.2005. URL: http://www.ig-zeitarbeit.de/admindownload/04-04-05_WK.pdf (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestring, Bettina (2000): „Zahl der Berufspendler wird wachsen“. In: Berliner Zeitung, 22.05.2000, 8. URL: http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2000/0522/politik/ 0019/ index.html (28.01.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke, Christian (2003): „Große Hürde für Ankara“. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12.03.2003, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auswärtiges Amt der Bundesrepublik Deutschland/Vertretung der Europäischen Kommission in der

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2002): Die Europäische Union — Fragen zur Erweiterung. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundespresseamt (2002): Evaluation der diesjährigen Veranstaltungsreihe „Europa in Arbeit“. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1977): Entscheidungen — öffentlichkeitsarbeit. In: Band 44, 125–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (2002): Entscheidungen — Glykol. In: Band 105, 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2000): Declaration on the Future of the Union to be Included in the Final Act of the Conference. Nice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2001): The Future of the European Union. Laeken Declaration. Laeken. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/laeken_council/index_en.htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2002a): Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No. 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation Applicable to the General Budget of the European Communities. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/publications/other_en.htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2002b): Information and Communication Strategy for the European Union. Draft Council Conclusions. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2005): Council Annual Report on Access to Documents 2004. Brussels. URL: http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/librairie/PDF/st08896.en05INT.pdf (12.01.2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1993a): Interinstitutional Declaration on Democracy, Transparency and Subsidiarity. Brussels. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/1801/01/democracy_declaration_1993.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1993b): Information and Communication Policy, Communication of Mr Pinheiro to the Commission, SEC (93) 916/9. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1995): Green Paper on the Practical Arrangements for the Introduction of the Single Currency. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1998): Special Report No 23/98 Concerning the Information and Communication Measures Managed by the Commission Accompanied by the Replies of the Commission (98/C 393/03). Brussels. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/1998/c_393/ c_39319981216en00470064.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000a): Communication Strategy for Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://europa. eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/pdf/sec_737_2000_en.pdf (28.03.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000b): EU Commission Launches a Comprehensive Communication Strategy on Enlargement. IP/00/464. Brussels. URL: http://Europa.eu.int/rapid (20.01.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000c): Agenda 2000. Stärkung und Erweiterung der Europäischen Union. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000d): Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission: „Catching the Tide of History: Enlargement and the Future of the Union“, Paul-Henri Spaak Foundation. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/rapid/searchAction.do (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001a): European Governance. A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf (30.07.2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001b): A New Framework for Co-operation on Activities Concerning the Information and Communication Policy on the European Union. COM (2001) 354 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0354en01.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001c): White Paper on European Governance Work Area No. 1. Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on European Matters. Report of the Working Group. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/governance/areas/group1/report_en.pdf (01.03.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001d): Perceptions of the European Union. A Qualitative Study of the Public’s Attitudes to and Expections of the European Union in the 15 Member States and the 9 Candidate Countries. General Report. Brussels. URL: http://Europa.eu.int/comm/governance/areas/ studies/optem-summary_en.pdf (18.01.2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001e): Attitudes and Behaviour of the Irish Electorate in the Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl108_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001f): Stratégie de communication sur l’élargissement pour la France 2002–2006. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001g): White Paper on European Governance Work Area No. 2. Handling the Process of Producing and Implementing Community Rules. Report of the Working Group „Evaluation and Transparency“. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001h): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2000. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/abc/doc/off/rg/en/welcome.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001i): Report of Activities 2001 — Representation in Germany. Berlin. European Commission (2001j): Working Programme 2002 for Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001k): Campagne sur l’élargissement en France. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001l): Towards the e-Commission, Europa 2nd Generation, Advanced Web Services to the Citizens, Business and Other Professional Users. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001m): Die Europäische Union: ein ständiger Erweiterungsprozess. Brussels. European Commission (2001n): Eurobarometer Special Edition 2001 (Enlargement — Euro — Debate on Europe). Fieldwork: March-April 2001. Brussels. URL: http://Europa.eu.int/comm/dg10/ epo/eb/ebrep1/ebrep1.html (18.01.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001o): Programme de travail de la Représentation pour 2002. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001p): Access to European Commission Documents. A Citizen’s Guide. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgc/acc_doc/index_en.htm (18.02. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001q): Eurobarometer 56. First Results. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/ comm/dg10/epo/eb/eb56/eb56highlights_en.pdf (18.01.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001r): The Communication Strategy for the Fifth Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/enlargement_process/past_enlargements/communic ation_strategy/index_en.htm (14.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002-2004a): Rapports mensuels sur la mise en oeuvre de la stratégie de communication sur l’élargissement. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002-2004b): The Communication Strategy for Enlargement. Progress Reports. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/#updates (Nicht alle Reports sind online verfügbar.) (16.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002-2004c): The Communication Strategy for Enlargement. Progress Reports. Germany. Berlin. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/#updates (Nicht alle Reports sind online verfügbar.) (16.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002a): Explaining Enlargement. A Progress Report on the Communication Strategy for Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/ pdf/explaining_enlargement.pdf (24.04.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002b): Information and Communication Strategy for the European Union, COM (2002) 350 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/press_communication/ pdf/com_2002_350_en.pdf (20.09.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002c): Explaining Europe’s Enlargement. COM (2002) 281 final. Brussels. URL: http://www.europa-kommissionen.dk/upload/application/971cbf61/kom_2002_281en. pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002d): Enlargement of the EU From Six to Fifteen and Beyond. Power Point Presentation. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/enlargement_process/ past_enlargements/communication_strategy/enlargement_en.pdf (14.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002e): Flash Eurobarometer 124. European Enlargement, UK Opinion Poll. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/flash/fl124_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002f): Flash Eurobarometer 132,1. Enlargement of the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/flash/fl132_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002g): Flash Eurobarometer 132,2. Enlargement of the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/flash/fl132_2_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002h): Meetings of Communication Directors from Future Member States, 12th November 2002. Conclusions. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002i): Report of 2002 — Representation in Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002j): Calls for Proposal — Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/ comm/enlargement/communication/pdf/1apel_av_en_final_10_09.pdf (17.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002k): Eurobarometer 56.3. „Special Bureaux“ 2002. Getting Information on Europe, the Enlargement of the EU, Support for European Integration. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/ebs_166_en.htm (01.08.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002l): Working Programme 2003 for Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002m): Management Plan 2003. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002n): Compte rendu de la réunion du Groupe Interinstitutionnel de l’Information (GII). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002o): IGI 24 September 2002 — Strasbourg. Brussels. European Commission (2002p): Eine Informations-und Kommunikationsstrategie für die Europäische Union. KOM (2002) 350 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/press_communication/ pdf/com_2002_350_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002q): Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union. Eine historische Gelegenheit. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002r): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2001. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/abc/doc/off/rg/en/welcome.htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002s): Erläuterungen zur Erweiterung Europas. KOM (2002) 281 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/sevilla/com2002-281_de.pdf (28.03.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002t): Eurobarometer 57. First Results. Spring 2002, Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb57/eb57_en.htm (01.08.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002u): Kommunikationsstrategie zur EU-Erweiterung in Deutschland. Brussels. URL: http://www.eu-kommission.de/html/aktuell/kampa.asp (27.05.2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003a): Comparative Analysis of the Member States’ and Candidate Countries’ Legislation Concerning Access to Documents. SG/616/03-EN. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003b): The Communication Strategy on Enlargement. State of Play and Perspectives. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003c): Marcom International: Evaluation de la Stratégie de Communication sur l’élargissement de l’Union européenne. Rapport Intermédiaire. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003d): Evaluation of the Information Programme for the European Citizen. „The Euro — One Currency for Europe“. Deloitte & Touche, Burson-Marsteller. Final Report, ECFIN/R/4/2002/04. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003e): The Enlargement Communications Strategy. Monitoring Progress and Challenges. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003f): The Enlargement Communications Strategy. Monitoring Progress and Challenges. Second Edition. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003g): Compte rendu de la réunion du Groupe Interinstitutionnel de l’Information (GII). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003h): Flash Eurobarometer 140. Enlargement of the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/flash/fl140_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003i): Enlargement Communication Strategy Toolkit. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003j): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2002. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/abc/doc/off/rg/en/welcome.htm (20.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003k): Rapport d’évaluation des activités sur l’élargissement 2002-2003. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003l): Evaluierung Zuschussprogramme 2002/03. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003m): Rapport annuel d’activités 2002. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003n): Activity Report 2002 — Representation in Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003o): Compte rendu de la réunion du Groupe Interinstitutionnel de l’Information (GII). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003p): Bilan Europa II à mi-parcours: 2001-2004. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003q): EU Information and Documentation Relays and Networks. Under the Responsibility of DG Press. Stocktaking Evaluation 2003. Final Overall Report. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003r): Europa-Forum 2003. Berlin. URL: http://www.eu-kommission.de/ html/aktuell/thema.asp?id=202 (25.11.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003s): Mehr Einheit und mehr Vielfalt. Die größte Erweiterung in der Geschichte der Europäischen Union. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003t): More Unity and More Diversity. The European Union’s Biggest Enlargement. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003u): Eurobarometer 58. Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb58/eb58_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003v): Eurobarometer 59. Public Opinion in the European Union. Spring 2003. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb59/eb59_rapport_final_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003w): Flash Eurobarometer 142/2. Convention on the Future of Europe — Wave 2. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl142_2_convention_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004a): Implementing the Information and Communication Strategy for the European Union, COM (2004) 196 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/ press_communication/pdf/com_2004_196_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004b): Implementation of an Information and Communication Strategy on the Euro and Economic and Monetary Union. COM (2004) 552 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/about/evaluation/evaluation_PRINCEeuro_en. htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004c): OPTEM: Qualitative Research Regarding the Orientation of European Union Communication. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004d): Enlargement. Basic Arguments. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/ comm/ enlargement/arguments/index.htm (29.05.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004e): Financial Report 2003. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ budget/infos/publications_en.htm (01.06.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004f): Global Assessment Report on Implementation of the Communication Strategy on Enlargement. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004g): Allemagne, Management Plan. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004h): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2003. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/abc/doc/off/rg/en/welcome.htm (20.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004i): Evaluation des actions d’information sur l’Union européenne de la Représentation en France 2004. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004j): Formulaire standard de réponse — RAA 2003 Representation in Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004k): Implementation of the Principles in EC Regulation No. 1049/2001 Regarding Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, COM (2004) 45 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004l): Compte rendu de la réunion du Groupe Interinstitutionnel de l’Information (GII). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004m): Rapport d’évaluation sur la décentralisation des campagnes PRINCE dans les représentations en 2003. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004n): Secrétariat Général: Dossier Relatif à l’Action sur l’Avenir de l’Union Européenne, Etat des lieux et initiatives 2004. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004o): Evaluation of the Initiative Spring Day in Europe (Contract TF-2003-04), Final Report. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004p): Rapport Analyse des Grands Centres d’Information sur l’Europe, DG Press, Cellule Evaluation. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004q): Eurobarometer 60. Public Opinion in the European Union. Autumn 2003. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb60/eb60_rapport_ standard_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004r): Team Europe. Activity Report 2003. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004s): Interactive Policy Making — Online Consultations and Feedback Mechanism. DG TAXUD Workshop. Brussels. URL: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/Other/UNPAN024336.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004t): Eurobarometer Spring 2004. Public Opinion in the European Union. EB 61. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb61/eb61_en.pdf (06.01.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005a): Recapitulatif: Consommation des Crédits — Activités d’Information et de Communication sur l’élargissement. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005b): Berichtüber die Anwendung der neuen Haushaltsordnung. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/budget/furtherinfo/index_pg2_de.htm#execution (18.02. 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005c): Flash Eurobarometer: The European Constitution: Post-referendum Survey in France. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/flash/fl171_en. pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005d): Flash Eurobarometer: The European Constitution: Post-referendum Survey in The Netherlands. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/ flash/fl172_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005e): Annual Activity Report 2004 — Representation in Germany. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005f): Application in 2004 of Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regarding Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, COM (2005) 348 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005g): Annex to the Report on the Application in 2004 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 Regarding Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, SEC (2005) 1025. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005h): Action Plan to Improve Communicating Europe by the Commission, SEC (2005) 985 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/communication/pdf/ communication_com_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005i): The Commission’s Contribution to the Period of Reflection and Beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate: COM (2005) 494 final. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/wallstrom/pdf/communication_planD_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005j): étude qualitative sur les publications centrales de la DG Presse et Communication. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005k): Margot Wallström: The New Communication strategy, IGI. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005l): DG Communication: Budget Implementation. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005m): DG Communication: Rapport annuel d’activité 2005. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/synthesis/aar/index_en.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005n): Copy of Each Information Product Made by PRESS in 2004 (PRESS/B/2/ME 6005). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005o): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2004. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/abc/doc/off/rg/en/welcome.htm (20.08.2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005p): Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union: Von 15 auf 25 Mitglieder, welche Folgen hat dies für uns? Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005q): Enlargement Archives: The Communication Strategy for the Fifth Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/enlargement_process/ past_enlargements/communication_strategy/index_en.htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005r): Eurobarometer 62. Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb62/eb_62_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005s): Eurobarometer 63. Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb63/eb63_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006a): White Paper on a European Communication Policy, COM (2006) 35 final. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/communication_white_paper/doc/ white_ paper_en.pdf (13.02.2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006b): Summary Future of Europe Debate. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu/ debateeurope/pdf/summary_debate_europe_072006.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006c): Exécution en engagement par Activités principales — Représentations et Unités au Si ège. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006d): Répartition des Ressources Humaines à la DG COMM 03/04/2001. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006e): Special Eurobarometer 243: Europeans and Their Languages. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006f): The Period of Reflection and Plan D. Communication From the Commission to the European Council. Provisional Version, COM (2006) 212. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006g): A Citizen’s Agenda. Delivering Results for Europe. Communication From the Commission to the European Council, COM (2006) 211 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006h): General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2005. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu/generalreport/en/2005/index.htm (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006i): Special Eurobarometer 255: Attitudes Towards European Union Enlargement. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_255_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006j): Eurobarometer 64. Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb64/eb64_en.pdf (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007a): Communicating Europe in Partnership, COM(2007) 568 final. Brussels. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2007/com2007_0568en01.pdf (1.4. 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007b): Communication to the Commission. Communicating about Europe via the Internet. Engaging the citizens, SEC(2007)1742. Brussels. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_ barroso/wallstrom/pdf/internet-strategy_en.pdf (1.4.2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007c): Eurobarometer 67. Public Opinion in the European Union. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb67/eb67_en.pdf (1.4.2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008): About EUROPA. Statistics for the last five years. Brussels. URL: http://europa.eu/abouteuropa/stat/index.htm (1.4.2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Auditors (1998): Special Report No 23/98 Concerning the Information and Communication Measures Managed by the Commission Accompanied by the Replies of the Commission (98/C 393/03). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Journalism Centre (2004): Broadening Horizons: EU Journalists Focus on the New Member States. Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Ombudsman (2005): Special Report From the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament Following the Draft Recommendation to the Council of the European Union in Complaint 2395/2003/GG. Brussels. URL: http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/special/pdf/en/ 032395.pdf (25.01.2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1993): Report on the Information Policy of the European Community (A3-0238/1993, final). Committee on Culture, Youth, Education and the Media. Rapporteur: Arie M. Oostlander. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2002): Report on the Commission Communication on a New Framework for Cooperation on Activities Concerning the Information and Communication Policy of the European Union (A5-0051/2002, final). Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport. Rapporteur: Ole Andreasen. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2003): Report on an Information and Communication Strategy for the European Union (A5-0053/2003). Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport. Rapporteur: Juan José Bayona de Perogordo. Brussels. URL: http://www.europarl.eu.int/omk/ sipade3? PUBREF=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A5-2003-0053+0+DOC+PDF+V0// EN&L=EN&LEVEL=4&NAV=S&LSTDOC=Y (19.01.2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2005): Report on the Implementation of the European Union’s Information and Communication Strategy. Committee on Culture and Education. Rapporteur: Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor. A6-0111/2005 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2006): Report on the White Paper on a European Communication Policy (2006/2087(INI)), Committee on Culture and Education, Rapporteur: Luis Herrero-Tejedor, A6-0365/2006. Brussels. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/omk/sipade3?PROG=REPORT& SORT_ORDER=D&REF_A=A6-2006-0365&NAV=X&L=EN&LEVEL=2&SAME_LEVEL=1 (18.02.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2001): Communication Plan for 2001. Public Information Campaign on EU Enlargement. Den Haa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Anhang. In: Europäische Öffentlichkeit durch Öffentlichkeitsarbeit?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91058-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91058-1_9

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15704-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91058-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics