The Terms and Relations of Comparison, Referential and Relative Processes



Karl-Dieter Opp has a passion for precision. This passion for precision shines through all his contributions - theoretical, empirical, methodological. And it animates every undertaking and every collaboration. To honor Karl-Dieter Opp and celebrate his contributions to social science, I take his spirit to the realms in which I am currently working and attempt to render more precise some words we use every day.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. Allen, R. G. D. 1938. Mathematical Analysis for Economists. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, Joseph, Bernard P. Cohen, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1966. Status Characteristics and Expectation States. Pp. 29–46 in Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr., and Bo Anderson (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Volume 1. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, R. G. D., M. Hamit Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, R. G. D., Morris Zelditch, Jr., Bo Anderson, and Bernard P. Cohen. 1972. Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status-Value Formulation. Pp. 119–246 in Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, and Bo Anderson (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Volume 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, Peter M. 1974. Presidential Address: Parameters of Social Structure. American Sociological Review 39:615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, Peter M. 1977a. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, Peter M. 1977b. A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 83:26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goode, William J. 1978. The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Homans, George 1967. Fundamental Social Processes. Pp. 29–78 in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Sociology: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Humphreys, Paul, and Joseph Berger. 1981. Theoretical Consequences of the Status Characteristics Formulation. American Journal of Sociology 86:953–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. James, William. (1891) 1952. The Principles of Psychology. Chicago: Britannica.Google Scholar
  12. Jasso, Guillermina. 1978. On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function. American Journal of Sociology 83:1398–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jasso, Guillermina. 1980. A New Theory of Distributive Justice. American Sociological Review 45:3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jasso, Guillermina. 1983a. Fairness of Individual Rewards And Fairness of the Reward Distribution: Specifying the Inconsistency between the Micro and Macro Principles of Justice. Social Psychology Quarterly 46:185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jasso, Guillermina. 1983b. Social Consequences of the Sense of Distributive Justice: Small-Group Applications. Pp. 243–294 in David M. Messick and Karen S. Cook (eds.), Theories of Equity: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  16. Jasso, Guillermina. 1988. Principles of Theoretical Analysis. Sociological Theory 6:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jasso, Guillermina. 1990. Methods for the Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Comparison Processes, Sociological Methodology 20:369–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jasso, Guillermina. 1993a. Building the Theory of Comparison Processes: Construction of Postulates and Derivation of Predictions. Pp. 212–264 (references, pp. 474-478) in Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch, Jr. (eds.), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jasso, Guillermina. 1993b. Choice and Emotion in Comparison Theory. Rationality and Society 5:231–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jasso, Guillermina. 2000. Some of Robert K. Merton’s Contributions to Justice Theory. Sociological Theory 18:331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jasso, Guillermina. 2001a. Comparison Theory. Pp. 669–698 in Jonathan H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jasso, Guillermina. 2001b. Rule-Finding about Rule-Making: Comparison Processes and the Making of Norms. Pp. 348–393 in Michael Hechter and Karl-Dieter Opp (eds.), Social Norms. New York, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Jasso, Guillermina. 2001c. Studying Status: An Integrated Framework. American Sociological Review 66:96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasso, Guillermina. 2004. The Tripartite Structure of Social Science Analysis. Sociological Theory 22:401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jasso, Guillermina. 2006a. Homans and the Study of Justice. Pp. 203–227 in A. Javier Treviño (ed.), George C. Homans: History, Theory, and Method. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jasso, Guillermina. 2006b. The Theory of Comparison Processes. Pp. 165–193 in Peter J. Burke (ed.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jasso, Guillermina. 2007. Theoretical Unification in Justice and Beyond. SocialJustice Research 20:.Google Scholar
  28. Jasso, Guillermina. In press. A New Unified Theory of Sociobehavioral Forces. European Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  29. Jasso, Guillermina, and Samuel Kotz. In press. A New Continuous Distribution and Two New Families of Distributions Based on the Exponential. Statistica Neerlandica 61:.Google Scholar
  30. Marx, Karl. (1849) 1968. Wage Labour and Capital. Pp. 74–97 in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Selected Works. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Merton, Robert K. [ 1949,1957] 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Merton, Robert K. 1957. Continuities in the Theory of Reference Groups and Social Structure. Pp. 281–386 in R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. Second edition, revised and enlarged. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Merton, Robert K., and Alice S. Rossi. 1950. Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior. Pp. 40–105 in R. K. Merton and P. Lazarsfeld (eds.), Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of “The American Soldier”. New York: Free Press. Reprinted as p. 225–280 in R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. Second edition, revised and enlarged. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Plato, [c. 428-348/7 1952. The Dialogues of Plato. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Chicago: Britannica.Google Scholar
  35. Sørensen, Aage 1979. A Model and a Metric for the Analysis of the Intragenerational Status Attainment Process. American Journal of Sociology 85:361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Webster, Murray, Jr. 2006. Status Research Since 2000. Paper presented at the annual Group Processes Conference, Montreal, Canada, August 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations