Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ist Deutschland reif für eine Kanzlerin? Eine experimentelle Untersuchung aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005

  • Chapter
Die Bundestagswahl 2005

Auszug

„Deutschland ist reif für eine Bundeskanzlerin“. Dies äußerte Volker Kauder, zum damaligen Zeitpunkt Generalsekretär der CDU, im Februar 2005 in einem Gespräch mit der Redaktion des Hamburger Abendblatts (Ausgabe vom 3. Februar 2005). Es kann mit einiger Berechtigung bezweifelt werden, ob er diese Aussage acht Monate später so noch einmal wiederholt hätte. War die CDU/CSU doch bei der vorgezogenen Bundestagswahl im September 2005 mit ihrer Spitzenkandidatin Angela Merkel am Wahltag deutlich eingebrochen und mit nur 35,2 Prozent der Zweitstimmen weit hinter den Umfrageergebnissen der vorangegangenen beiden Wochen zurückgeblieben, die bei mindestens 41 Prozent lagen (http://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/archiv/2005.htm).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adams, Williams C. (1975): Candidate characteristics, office of election, and voter responses. In: Experimental Study of Politics 4, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosius, Margery M.; Welch, Susan (1984): Women and politics at the grassroots: Women candidates for state office in three states, 1950-1978. In: Social Science Journal 21,29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandilla, Wolfgang (1999): WWW-Umfragen-Eine alternative Datenerhebungstechnik für die empirische Sozialforschung? Batinic, Bernad; Werner, Andreas; Gräf, Lorenz; Bandilla, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Online Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse. Göttingen u.a.: Hogrefe, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassili, John N. (1981): The attractiveness stereotype: Goodness or glamour? In: Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Robert A.; Polly, Jane D. (1975): Race, class and support for female candidates. In: Western Political Quarterly 28, 733–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Jeff E.; Hamermesh, Daniel S. (1998): Beauty, Productivity, and Discrimination: Lawyers’ Looks and Lucre. In: Journal of Labor Economics 16, 172–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Barbara (1990): The Presence of women candidates and role of gender in campaigns for the state legislature in an urban setting: the case of Massachusetts. In: Women & Politics 10, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Cal; Clark, Janet (1984): The Growth of Women’s Candidacies for Nontraditional Offices in New Mexico. In: Social Science Journal 21, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth A. (1998): Voter reaction to women candidates. In: Thomas, Sue; Wilcox, Clyde (Hrsg.): Women and elective office. Past, present, and future. New York,Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, Robert; Schramm, Sarah S. (1977): When women run against men. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 41, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermer, Marshall; Thiel, Darrel L. (1975): When beauty may fail. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, 1168–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, Karen K.; Berscheid, Ellen; Walster, Elaine (1972): What is Beautiful is Good. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, Karen K.; Berscheid, Ellen (1974): Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children. In: Sociometry 37, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H.; Ashmore, Richard D.; Makhijani, Mona G.; Longo, Laura C. (1991): What is beautiful is good, but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. In: Psychological Bulletin 110, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efran, Michael G. (1974): The Effect of Physical Appearance on the Judgment of Guilt, Interpersonal Attraction, and Severity of Recommended Punishment in Simulated Jury Task. In: Journal of Research in Personality 8, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrand, Laurie E.; Eckert, William A. (1981): The impact of candidate’s sex on voter choice. In: Western Politics Quarterly 34, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, Allan (1992): Good-looking people are not what we think. In: Psychological Bulletin 111,304–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feree, Myra M. (1974): A Woman for President? Changing Responses: 1958-1972. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 38, 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Richard L.; Smith, Eric R. (1998): The role of candidate sex in voter decision-making. In: Political Psychology 19, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddie, Ronald K.; Bullock, Charles S. (1995): Congressional Elections and the Year of the Woman: Structural and Elite Influences on Female Candidates. In: Social Science Quarterly 76, 749–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, Karl (2002): Signale der Liebe. Die biologischen Gesetze der Partnerschaft. München: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel S.; Biddle, Jeff E. (1994): Beauty and the Labor Market. In: American Economic Review 84, 1174–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel S.; Parker, Amy M. (2005): Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ Pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. In: Economics of Education Review 24, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Barry (2000): Beauty, Stature and the Labour Market: A British Cohort Study. In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 62, 771–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmanns, Peter (1999): Grenzen und Chancen von quantitativen Befragungen mit Hilfe des Internets. In: Batinic, Bernad; Werner, Andreas; Gräf, Lorenz; Bandilla, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Online Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse. Göttingen u.a.: Hogrefe, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, Madelaine E.; Saruwatari, Lewis R. (1979): When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23, 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, Megumi; Stone-Romero, Eugene F.; Coats, Gwen (2003): The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Job-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. In: Personnel Psychology 56, 431–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnig, Albert K.; Walter, Oliver B. (1976): Election of women to city councils. In: Social Science Quarterly 56, 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenski, Kate; Falk, Erika (2004): Of what is that glass ceiling made? A study of attitudes about women and the Oval Office. In: Women & Politics 26, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Markus; Rosar, Ulrich (2005): Physische Attraktivität und Wahlerfolg. Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel der Wahlkreiskandidaten bei der Bundestagswahl 2002. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Markus; Rosar, Ulrich (2006): Physical Attractiveness and Electoral Success. A Comparative Study of General Elections in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Köln: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, Mark S. (1991): The impact of prejudice on female candidates: an experimental look at voter inference. In: American Politics Quarterly 19, 248–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, Jon K.; Kenrick, Douglas T.; Becker, Vaughn D.; Delton, Andreas W.; Hofer, Brian; Wilbur, Chris J.; Neuberg, Steven L. (2003): Sexually Selective Cognition: Beauty Captures the Mind of the Beholder. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 1107–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur G. (1970): Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. In: Psychonomic Science 19, 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mocan, Naci; Tekin, Erdal (2006): Ugly Criminals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research (=NBER Working Paper No. 12019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, Matthew; Orbell, John; Shatto, Catharine; Stockard, Jean (1998): Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity, and Success in Everyday Exchange. In: American Journal of Sociology 103, 1565–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podratz, Kenneth E.; Dipboye, Robert L. (2002): In Search of the “Beauty is Beastly” Effect. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwasser, Shirley; Seale, Jana (1988): Attitudes toward a hypothetical male or female presidential candidate-a research note. In: Political Psychology 9, 591–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, Kira (2002): Gender stereotypes and vote choice. In: American Journal of Political Science 46, 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, E. M. (1978): Education and change in American opinions on a woman for President. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sczesny, Sabine; Kühnen, Ulrich (2004): Meta-cognition about biological sex and gender-stereotypic physical appearance: Consequences for the assessment of leadership competence. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, Richard; Newman, Jody; Leighton, Melissa V. (1997): Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, Lee; Welch, Susan (1984): Race, gender, and opinion toward black and female presidential candidates. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, Glenna; Huber, Joan (1980): Changing attitudes toward women’s nonfamily roles: 1958-1980: In: Sociology of Work and Occupations 7, 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, Cassia; Gillespie, Diane (1987): Adolescents’ willingness to vote for a woman for president: The effect of gender and race. In: Women & Politics 7, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Seth; Steckenrider, Janie (1997): The relative irrelevance of candidate sex. In: Women & Politics 17, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, Debra; Hughes, Michael (1987): The Impact of Physical Attractiveness on Achievement and Psychological Weil-Being. In: Social Psychology Quarterly 50, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Susan; Sigelman, Lee (1982): Changes in public attitudes toward women in politics. In: Social Science Quarterly 63, 312–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipp, John F.; Plutzer, Eric (1985): Gender differences in voting for female candidates: Evidence from the 1982 election. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 49, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität zu Köln, Germany

    Marcus Klein & Ulrich Rosar

Authors
  1. Marcus Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrich Rosar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Frank Brettschneider Oskar Niedermayer Bernhard Weßels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klein, M., Rosar, U. (2007). Ist Deutschland reif für eine Kanzlerin? Eine experimentelle Untersuchung aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005. In: Brettschneider, F., Niedermayer, O., Weßels, B. (eds) Die Bundestagswahl 2005. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90536-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90536-5_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15350-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90536-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation