Advertisement

Liberaler Intergouvernementalismus

  • Jochen Steinhilber

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff des „Liberalen Intergouvernementalismus“ geht – mit dem Liberalismus und dem Realismus – eine zunächst paradox erscheinende Verbindung zweier Traditionslinien der Internationalen Beziehungen ein. Oft wurde der Ansatz, der von Andrew Moravcsik entwickelt wurde, dabei als Reformulierung intergouvernementaler Ansätze begriffen und in Abgrenzung zu „funktionalistischen“ Theorien eher dem „realistischen“ Strang des integrationstheoretischen Denkens zugeordnet.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Einstiegstext

  1. Moravcsik, Andrew 1993: Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 31:4, 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Empfohlene Literatur

  1. Moravcsik, Andrew 1997: Taking Preferences Seriously. A Liberal Theory of International Politics. In: International Organization 51:4, 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Moravcsik, Andrew 1998: The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Moravcsik, Andrew 2002b: In Defence of the Democratic Deficit. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 40:4, 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Moravcsik, Andrew 2003a: Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real not Metaphysical. In: International Study Review 5:1, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Puchala, Donald 1999: Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism and European Integration. A Review Article. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 37:2, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Reus-Smit, Christian 2001: The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory. In: European Journal of International Law 12:3, 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Übrige verwendete Literatur

  1. Andersen, Svein 2003: On a Clear Day you can see the EU. Oslo: ARENA Working Papers 16/03.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, Michael M. und William D. Coleman 1989: Strong States and Weak States. Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies. In: British Journal of Political Science 19:1, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caporaso, James A. 1999: Toward a Normal Science of Regional Integration. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:1, 160–164.Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen, Thomas/Jørgensen, Knut E./Wiener, Antje 2001 (Hrsg.): The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, Robert W. 1998: Soziale Kräfte, Staaten und Weltordnungen. Jenseits der Theorie Internationaler Beziehungen. In: Cox, Robert W.: Weltordnung und Hegemonie. Grundlagen der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie. Marburg: Studien der Forschungsgruppe Europäische Gemeinschaften Nr.11, 28–68.Google Scholar
  6. Diez, Thomas 1999: Riding the AM-Track through Europe or, the Pitfalls of a Rationalist Journey through European Integration. In: Millennium Journal of International Relations 28:2, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elster, Jon 1989: Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fioretos, Karl-Orfeo 1997: The Anatomy of Autonomy. Interdependence, Domestic Balances of Power, and European Integration. In: Review of International Studies 23:3, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffmann, Stanley 1964: The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 3:2, 85–101.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmann, Stanley 1987: Janus and Minerva. Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jachtenfuchs, Markus/Kohler-Koch, Beate 1996: Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem. In: Dies. (Hrsg.): Europäische Integration. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 15–44.Google Scholar
  12. Jahn, Beate 2009: Liberal internationalism: from ideology to empirical theory – and back again. In: International Theory 1:3, 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jahn, Beate 2010: Universal languages? A reply to Moravcsik. In: International Theory 2:1, 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keohane, Robert O./Macedo, Stephen/Moravcsik, Andrew 2009: Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. In: International Organization 63:1, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Legro, Jeffrey/Moravcsik Andrew 1999: Is Anybody still a Realist? In: International Security 24:2, 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks, Gary/Hooghe, Liesbet/Blank, Kermit 1996: European Integration from the 1980s. State-Centric vs. Multi-Level Governance. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 34:3, 341–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moravcsik, Andrew 1991: Negotiating the Single European Act. National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. In: International Organization 45:1, 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moravcsik, Andrew 1992: Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University, CFIA Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Moravcsik, Andrew 1994: Why the European Community Strengthens the State. Domestic Politics and International Cooperation. Working Paper Nr. 52, Cambridge M.A.: Harvard University Center for European Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Moravcsik, Andrew 1995: Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration. A rejoinder. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 33:4, 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moravcsik, Andrew 1996: Federalism and Peace. A Structural Liberal Perspective. In: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3:1, 123–132.Google Scholar
  22. Moravcsik, Andrew 1999a: The Future of European Integration Studies. Social Science or Social Theory. In: Millennium: Journal of International Relations 28:2, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moravcsik, Andrew 1999b: Is Something Rotten in the State of Denmark? Constructivism and European Integration. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:4, 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moravcsik, Andrew 1999c: The Choice for Europe. Current Commentary and Future Research. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:1, 168–179.Google Scholar
  25. Moravcsik, Andrew 2001: Bringing Constructivist Theory out of the Cloud: Has it Landed yet? In: European Union Politics 2:2, 226–249.Google Scholar
  26. Moravcsik, Andrew 2002a: Liberal International Relations Theory. In: Elman, Colin/Elman, Miriam F. (Hrsg): Progress in International Relations Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 159–204.Google Scholar
  27. Moravcsik, Andrew 2002c: Europe without Illusions. Paper presented at the Third Spaak Foundation – Harvard University Conference, 6–8 September, Brüssel.Google Scholar
  28. Moravcsik, Andrew 2003b: The EU ain’t broke. In: Prospect, March, 38–45.Google Scholar
  29. Moravcsik, Andrew 2004: Is there a “Democratic Deficit“ in World Politics. A Framework for Analysis. In: Government and Opposition 39:2, 336–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moravcsik, Andrew 2006: What can we learn from the collapse of the European Constitutional Project. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47:2, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moravcsik, Andrew 2008a: The European Constitutional Settlement. In: The World Economy 31, 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moravcsik, Andrew 2008b: The Myth of Europe’s Democratic Deficit. In: Intereconomics 43:6, 331–340.Google Scholar
  33. Moravcsik, Andrew 2010a: “Wahn, Wahn, überall Wahn”: A reply to Jahn’s critique of liberal internationalism. In: International Theory 2:1, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moravcsik, Andrew 2010b: Tilting at windmills: a final reply to Jahn. In: International Theory 2:1, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moravcsik, Andrew/Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 1999: Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam. Interests, Influence and Institutions. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 37:1, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moravcsik, Andrew/Schimmelfennig, Frank 2009: Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In: Dietz, Thomas/Wiener, Antje (Hrsg.): European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–87.Google Scholar
  37. Neyer, Jürgen/Wolf, Dieter 1996: Zusammenfügen was zusammengehört! Zur Notwendigkeit eines Brückenschlages zwischen alten und neuen Fragestellungen der Integrationsforschung. In: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3:2, 399–423.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, Mancur 1991: Aufstieg und Niedergang der Nationen. Ökonomisches Wachstum, Stagflation und soziale Starrheit. 2. Aufl., Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  39. Pierson, Paul 1996: The Path to European Integration. A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. In: Comparative Political Studies 29:2, 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polanyi, Karl 1944: The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pollack, Mark A. 2003: The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, Robert D. 1988: Diplomacy and Domestic Politics. The Logic of Two–Level Games. In: International Organization 42:3, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Risse, Thomas/Wiener, Antje 1999: “Something Rotten“ and the Social Construction of Social Constructivism. A Comment on Comments. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:5, 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenberg, Justin 1990: What’s the Matter with Realism? In: Review of International Studies 16:4, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandholtz, Wayne/Zysman, John 1989: 1992. Recasting the European Bargain. In: World Politics 42:1, 95–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999: Selecting Cases and Testing Hypotheses. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:1, 164–168.Google Scholar
  47. Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960: The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.Google Scholar
  48. Schieder, Siegfried 2010: Neuer Liberalismus. In: Schieder, Siegfried/Spindler, Manuela (Hrsg.): Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen. 3. Aufl., Opladen & Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 187–222.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner, Quentin 1988: Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. In: Tully, James (Hrsg.): Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 29–67.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, Steve 2000: International Theory and European Integration. In: Kelstrup, Morten/Willams, Michael C. (Hrsg.): International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. Power, Security and Community. London: Routledge, 33–56.Google Scholar
  51. Tsebelis, George 1995: Conditional Agenda Setting and Decision Making Inside the European Parliament. In: Journal of Legislative Studies 1:1, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wallace, Helen 1999: Piecing the Integration Jigsaw Together. In: Journal of European Public Policy 6:1, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wincott, Daniel 1995: Institutional interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 33:4, 597–609.Google Scholar
  54. Wind, Marlene 1997: Rediscovering Institutions: A Reflectivist Critique of Rational Institutionalism. In: Jørgensen, Knut E. (Hrsg.): Reflective Approaches to European Governance. Houndsmill: Macmillan, 15–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Steinhilber
    • 1
  1. 1.Globale Politik und EntwicklungFriedrich-Ebert-StiftungBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations