Staatsterror in Lateinamerika

  • Michael Riekenberg
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Aus der Perspektive primitiver Gesellschaften in Südamerika den Staat betrachtend, kam der französische Anthropologe Pierre Clastres zu dem Schluss, dass der Staat an sich ethnozidär sei: „Jede staatliche Organisation ist ethnozidär, der Ethnozid ist die normale Daseinsweise des Staates.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ablard, Jonathan. 2008. Madness in Buenos Aires. Patients, Psychiatrists, and the Argentine State 1880 – 1983. Athens.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, Jeremy. 1999. Colonial Legacies. The Problem of Persistance in Latin American History. London.Google Scholar
  3. Agger, Inger, und Soren Jensen. 1996. Trauma and Healing under State Terrorism. London.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Martin E. 1993. Dossier Secreto: Argentina’s Deaparecidos and the Myth of the „Dirty War“. Boulder.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, Hannah. 1970. Macht und Gewalt. München.Google Scholar
  6. Armony, Ariel C. 2005. Producing and Exporting State Terror. The Case of Argentina. In When States Kill: Latin America, the U. S., and Technologies of Terror, hg. von Cecilia Menjívar, und Néstor Rodríguez, 305 – 331. Austin.Google Scholar
  7. Avruch, Kevin. 2001. Notes toward Ethnographies of Conflict and Violence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 30: 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azcona, José M. 2010. Violencia política y terrorismo de estado en Argentina: Del totalitarismo de José Uriburu (1930) a la dictatura militar 1976 – 1983. Madrid.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. Dialektik der Ordnung. Die Moderne und der Holocaust. Hamburg.Google Scholar
  10. Bourgeois, Philippe. 1997. Confronting the Ethics of Ethnography: Lessons Lerned from Fieldwork in Central America. In Decolonizing Anthropology, hg. von Faye W. Harrison, 111 – 127. Washington.Google Scholar
  11. Carmack, Robert, Hg. 1988. Harvest of violence: The Maya Indians and the Guatemalan crisis. Norman.Google Scholar
  12. Clastres, Pierre. 2008. Archäologie der Gewalt. 9. Aufl. Zürich, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, Karen, Hg. 2001. Trust in Society. New York.Google Scholar
  14. Craton, Michael. 1997. Forms of Resistance to Slavery. In General History of the Caribbean: Vol. 3. The Slave Societies of the Caribbean, hg. von Franklin W. Knight, 222 – 270. London.Google Scholar
  15. Dinges, John. 2004. The Condor Years. How Pinochet and his Allies brought Terrorism to Three Continents. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Eakin, E. 0. Anthropology’s Alternative Radical. New York Times.Google Scholar
  17. Esparza, Marcia. 2009. Introduction: Globalizing Latin American Studies of State Violence and Genocide. In State Violence and Genocide in South America: The Cold War Years, hg. von Marcia Esparza, Henry R. Huttenbach, und Daniel Feierstein, 1 – 19. London.Google Scholar
  18. Falla, Ricardo. 1992. Masacres de la selva: Ixcán, Guatemala, 1975 – 1982. Guatemala.Google Scholar
  19. Figueroa Ibarra, Carlos. 1991. The Recourse of Fear. In Vigilantism and the State in Modern Latin America, hg. von Martha K. Huggins, 73 – 83. New York.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, Will. 1996. Authoritarianism in Latin America since Independence. Westport.Google Scholar
  21. France, Miranda. 1998. Bad Times in Buenos Aires. Hopewell.Google Scholar
  22. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Property. New York.Google Scholar
  23. Gill, Lesley,. 2004. The School of the Americas. Military Training and Political Violence in the Americas. Durham.Google Scholar
  24. Godoy, Angelina Snoodgrass. 2006. Popular Injustice: Violence, Community, and in Latin America. Stanford.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffmann, Bruce. 2008. Terrorismus. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  26. Huggins, Martha K., Hg. 1991. Vigilantism and the State in Modern Latin America. New York.Google Scholar
  27. Huggins, Martha K., und Mika Haritos-Fatouros. 1998. Bureaucratizing Masculinities among Brazilian Torturers and Murderers. In Masculinities and Violence, hg. von Lee H. Bowker, 29 – 54. Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  28. Kalmanowiecki, Laura. 2000. Origins and Applications of Political Policing in Argentina. Latin American Perspectives 27: 36 –56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knight, Alan. 2002. Subalterns, Signifiers and Statistics: Perspectives on Mexican Historiography. Latin American Research Review 37: 136 –158.Google Scholar
  30. Kosovsky, Mario. 2006. El ciudadano sheriff. Armas y violencia en Argentina. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  31. Krämer, Raimund, und Dirk Krüger. 2008. Das politische System Kubas. In Die politischen Systeme in Nord- und Lateinamerika, hg. von Klaus Stüwe, und Stefan Rinke, 362 – 387. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  32. Linz, Juan. 1996. Typen politischer Regime und die Achtung der Menschenrechte. In Totalitarismus im 20. Jahrhundert, hg. von Eckhard Jesse, 485 – 537. Bonn.Google Scholar
  33. Loveman, Brian, und Thomas Davies. 1997. The Politics of Antipolitics: The Military in Latin America. Wilmington.Google Scholar
  34. Mallon, Florencia. 1994. The Promise and Dilemma of Subaltern Studies. Perspectives from LatinGoogle Scholar
  35. American History. The American Historical Review 99: 1491 – 1515.Google Scholar
  36. Mansilla, Hugo. 1989. Zur politischen Kultur des Autoritarismus in Lateinamerika. Ibero-Amerikanisches Archiv 3: 371 –398.Google Scholar
  37. Martínez, C. F. 2005. Argentina después de la crisis: Un tiempo de oportunidades. Informe de desarrollo humano 2005. Sinopsis. Buenos Aires: PNUD.Google Scholar
  38. McSherry, J. Patrice. 2010. Predatory States. Operation Condor and Covert War in Latin America. Lanham.Google Scholar
  39. Menjívar, Cecilia, und Néstor Rodríguez. 2005. State Terror in the U. S.-Latin American Interstate Regime. In When States Kill: Latin America, the U. S., and Technologies of Terror, hg. von Cecilia Menjívar, und Néstor Rodríguez, 3 – 27. Austin.Google Scholar
  40. Nagengast, Carole. 1994. Violence, Terror, and the Crisis of State. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nordstrom, Carolyn, und Antonius Robben, Hg. 1995. Fieldwork under Fire. Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  42. Nunn, Frederick M. 1992. The Time of the Generals. Latin American Professional Militarism in World Perspective. Lincoln.Google Scholar
  43. Peñaranda, Ricardo. 1992. Surveying the Literature on the Violence. In Violence in Colombia. The Contemporary Crisis in Historical Perspective, hg. von Charles Bergquist, 293 – 314. Wilmington.Google Scholar
  44. Plessner, Helmuth. 1970. Philosophische Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  45. Plotkin, Mariano B. 1997. Freud, Politics and the Porteños: The Reception of Psychoanalysis in Buenos Aires 1910 – 1943. Hispanic American Historical Review 77: 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Popitz, Heinrich. 1992. Phänomene der Macht. Tübingen.Google Scholar
  47. Riekenberg, Michael. 2008. Auf dem Holzweg ? Über Johan Galtungs Begriff der „strukturellen Gewalt“. Zeitschrift für Zeithistorische Forschungen 5: 172–177.Google Scholar
  48. —. 2011. Über die Gewalttheorie von Georges Bataille und ihren Nutzen für die Gewaltsoziologie. Comparativ. Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und vergleichende Gesellschaftsforschung 21: 105–128.Google Scholar
  49. Riquelme, Horacio, Hg. 1990. Zeitlandschaft im Nebel. Menschenrechte, Staatsterrorismus und psychosoziale Gesundheit in Südamerika. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  50. Robben, Antonius. 2005. Political Violence and Trauma in Argentina. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, Jeffrey J. 2005. Turning on their Masters. State Terrorism and Unlearning Democracy in Uruguay. In When States Kill: Latin America, the U. S., and Technologies of Terror, hg. von Cecilia Menjívar, und Néstor Rodríguez, 278 – 304. Austin.Google Scholar
  52. Sanford, Victoria. 2003. Violencia y genocidio en Guatemala. GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  53. Schnepel, Bernd. 1999. Ethnologie und Geschichte. Historische Anthropologie 7: 109–128.Google Scholar
  54. Sluka, Jeffrey A. 2000. Introduction: State Terror and Anthropology. In Death Squad. The Anthropology of State Terror, hg. von Jeffrey A. Sluka, 1 – 45. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  55. Steinmetz, George, Hg. 1999. State/Culture. State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca.Google Scholar
  56. Stohl, Michael. 1984. International Dimensions of State Terrorism. In The State as Terrorist: The Dynamics of Governmental Violence and Repression, hg. von Michael Stohl, und George A. Lopez, 43 – 58. Westport.Google Scholar
  57. Stokes, William S. 1971. Violence as a Power Factor in Latin American Politics. In Conflict and Violence in Latin American Politics, hg. von Francisco J. Moreno, und Barbara Mitrani, 156 – 182. New York.Google Scholar
  58. Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo. 1992. A Grammar of Terror. Psychocultural Responses to State Terrorism in the Dirty War and Post-Dirty War Argentina. In The Paths to Domination, Resistance, and Terror, hg. von Carolyn Nordstrom, und Jo Ann Martin, 219 – 259. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  59. Taussig, Michael. 1984. Culture of Terror, Space of Death. Roger Casement’s Putumayo Report and the Explanation of Torture. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26: 467 –497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolf, Eric R. 1998. Anthropologie und Geschichte. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 9: 246 –268.Google Scholar
  61. Wright, Thomas C. 2007. State Terrorism in Latin America. Chile, Argentina, and International Human Rights. Lanham.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Riekenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.LeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations