Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kulturwissenschaftliche Disability Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Disability Studies

  • 11k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag stellt die kulturwissenschaftlichen Disability Studies in drei Schwerpunkten vor: Erstens aus der Perspektive einer kritischen Revision des sozialen Behinderungsmodells, zweitens im Rahmen der Ko-Konstituierung von Medien und (Nicht-)Behinderung und drittens im Kontext (selbst-)kritischer Disability Studies. Im Ergebnis eröffnen die kulturwissenschaftlichen Disability Studies ein pluralistisches Denken von (Nicht-)Behinderung jenseits von Homogenisierung und identitärer Einschließung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alper, M. (2015). Augmentative, alternative, and assistive: Reimagining the history of mobile computing and disability. IIEE Annals of the History of Computing, 37(1), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M. (2021). Critical media access studies: Deconstructing power, visibility, and marginality in mediated space. International Journal of Communication, 15(o. H.), 840–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media. An exploration of the principles for media representation of disabled people. Krumlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergermann, U. (2013). Ability Trouble. Helen Kellers Handästhetiken. In U. Bergermann (Hrsg.), Disability Trouble. Ästhetik und Bildpolitik bei Helen Keller (S. 15–53). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, M. (2002). Foreword: Side shows and back ends. In L. J. Davis (Hrsg.), Bending over backwards. Disability, dismodernism, and other difficult positions (S. vii–xii). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, M. (2005). Disability and narrative. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 120(2), 568–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodine, C. (2013). Assistive technology and science. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, H., & Scherpe, K. R. (Hrsg.). (1996). Literatur und Kulturwissenschaft. Positionen, Theorien, Modelle. Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1995). Körper von Gewicht. Die diskursiven Grenzen des Geschlechts. Berlin Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, K. E., & Pipes, R. (1985). Feature films and disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30(1), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (2005). Why virtualism paves the way to political impotence. Callon replies to Miller. Economic Sociology. European Electronic Newsletter, 6(2), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism. The production of disability and abledness. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheu, J., & Tyjewski, C. (2011). The male rapunzel in film. The intersections of disability, gender, race, and sexuality. In E. Watson, & M. E. Shaw (Hrsg.), Performing American masculinities: The 21st-century man in popular culture (S. 153–166). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, S., & Kriebernegg, U. (2017). Care home stories. Aging disability and long-term residential care. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, S., & Markotić, N. (2010). The problem body. Projecting disability on film. Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Disability/Postmodernity. Embodying disability theory. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, S., & Epstein, M. (2000). Points of contact. Disability, art, and culture. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberbatch, G., & Negrine, R. (Hrsg.). (1992). Images of disability on television. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. (1998). Understanding cinematic representations of disability. In T. Shakespeare (Hrsg.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (S. 181–197). Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K., & Dickea, J. (Hrsg.). (1987). Out of focus. Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy. Disability, deafness, and the body. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (2017). The disability studies reader (5. Aufl.). Routledge (Erstveröffentlichung 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlieger, P., Miranda-Galarza, B., Brown, S. E., & Strickfaden, M. (2016). Rethinking disability: World perspectives in culture and society. Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokumacı, A. (2016). Mikro-aktivistische Affordanzen: Critical Disability als Methode zur Untersuchung medialer Praktiken. In B. Ochsner, & R. Stock (Hrsg.), SenseAbility. Mediale Praktiken des Sehens und Hörens (S. 257–279). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access. Media disability and the politics of participation. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E., & Kirkpatrick, B. (2017). Disability media studies. New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Disability, locative media, and complex ubiquity. In U. Ekman, J. D. Bolter, L. Díaz, M. Søndergaard, & M. Engberg (Hrsg.), Ubiquitous computing, complexity and culture (S. 272–287). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., & Kao, K.-T. (2019). Who gets to play? Disability, open literacy, gaming. Cultural Science Journal, 11(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2017). Disability and social media: Global perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., Garland-Thomson, R., Kent, M., & Robertson, R. (Hrsg.). (2019a). Manifestos for the future of critical disablity studies. Bd. 1. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., Garland-Thomson, R., Kent, M., & Robertson, R. (Hrsg.). (2019b). Interdisciplinary approaches to disability. Looking towards the future. Bd. 2. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emens, E. F. (2007). Shape stops story. Narrative, 15(1), 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Der Wille zum Wissen. Sexualität und Wahrheit 1. Suhrkamp (Erstveröffentlichung 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (2016). Cultures of representation. Disability in world cinema contexts. Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (1997a). Body criticism as a context for disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 297–300. https://kp.osu.edu/handle/1811/85787. Zugegriffen: 28. Febr. 2021.

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (1997b). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2009). Staring: How we look. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschick, T. (2000). Toward a theory of disability and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 25(4), 1263–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability. The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2017). Dis/Entangling critical disability studies. In A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, & M. Ingwersen (Hrsg.), Culture – Theory – Disability. Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies (S. 81–97). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebe, A. (2016). Fotografische Normalisierung. Zur sozio-medialen Konstruktion von Behinderung am Beispiel des Fotoarchivs der Stiftung Liebenau. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Crip Technoscience Manifesto. Catalyst. Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1995). Die Neuerfindung der Natur: Primaten, Cyborgs und Frauen. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrasser, K. (2016). Parahumane Konstellationen von Körper und Technik. Aktive Mimesis und tumultöse Partnerschaften. FIfF-Kommunikation. Zeitschrift für Informatik und Gesellschaft, 2(33), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrasser, K. (2018). Schwächeln. Technikphilosophie, Techniksubjektivität, Unvermögen. Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften, 12(2), 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendren, S. (2014). All technology is assistive. Designers should not view disabled as „Them,“ but solve problems for „Us.“ WIRED, o. Jg.(o. H.), o. S. https://www.wired.com/2014/10/all-technology-is-assistive/. Zugegriffen: 15. Okt. 2020.

  • Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. (2016). Disability theatre and modern drama. Recasting modernism. Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshua, E., & Schillmeier, M. (Hrsg.). (2010). Disability in German literature, film, and theater. Edinburgh German yearbook. Bd. 4. Camden House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junior, N., & Schipper, J. (2013). Disability studies and the bible. In S. McKenzie, & J. Kaltner (Hrsg.), New meanings for ancient texts: Recent approaches to biblical criticisms and their applications (S. 21–37). John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagelmann, J. H., & Zimmermann, R. (Hrsg.). (1982). Massenmedien und Behinderte: Im besten Falle Mitleid? Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalthoff, H., Cress, T., & Röhl, T. (2016). Materialität. Herausforderungen für die Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften. Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klobas, L. E. (1988). Disability drama in television and film. McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBesco, K. (2004). Revolting bodies. The struggle to redefine fat identity. Massachussetts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledder, S. (2019). On dis/Ability within game studies – The discursive construction of ludic bodies. In K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent, & R. Robertson (Hrsg.), Interdisciplinary approaches to disability. Looking towards the future. Bd. 2 (S. 30–44). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markotić, N. (2008). Punching up the story. Disability and film. The Canadian Journal of Film Studies/Revue canadienne d'études cinématographiques, 17(1), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory. Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‚critical‘ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2011). Hearing aids and the history of electronics miniaturization. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 33(2), 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & Sterne, J. (2017). Afterword II. In E. Ellcessor, & B. Kirkpatrick (Hrsg.), Disability media studies (S. 365–378). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An Introduction to visual culture. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2000). Narrative prosthesis. Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2015). The biopolitics of disability. Neoliberalism, ablenationalism, and peripheral embodiment. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. W. J. (2001). Seeing disability. Public Culture, 13(3), 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2017). Krankheit tun. In S. Bauer, T. Heinemann, & T. Lemke (Hrsg.), Science and Technology Studies – Klassische Positionen und aktuelle Perspektiven (S. 429–471). Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (1999). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In L. Braudy, & M. Cohen (Hrsg.), Film theory and criticism: Introductory readings (S. 833–844). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, G., & Heylighen, A. (2015). Turning disability experience into expertise in assessing building accessibility: A contribution to articulating disability epistemology. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research/Revue européenne de recherche sur le handicap, 9(2), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norden, M. F. (1994). The cinema of isolation. A history of physical disability in the movies. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B. (2013). „Ich wollte, Sie könnten das auch einmal sehen“ (Fini Straubinger). Zum Widerstand der Bilder in „Land des Schweigens und der Dunkelheit“. In B. Ochsner, & A. Grebe (Hrsg.), Andere Bilder. Zur Produktion von Behinderung in der visuellen Kultur (S. 261–281). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B. (2017). Documenting neuropolitics: Cochlear implant activation videos. In H. Hughes, & C. Brylla (Hrsg.), Documentary and disability (S. 259–274). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B. (2018). AudioVisual Accessibility (Ava) oder: Zur Herstellung prekärer Kommunikationsgemeinschaften. In J. Bennke, J. Seifert, M. Siegler, & C. Terberl (Hrsg.), Prekäre Koexistenzen. Vom Zusammenleben mit Viren, Maschinen und Algorithmen (S. 121–147). Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B., & Grebe, A. (2013). Andere Bilder. Zur Produktion von Behinderung in der visuellen Kultur. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B., & Stock, R. (Hrsg.). (2016). SenseAbility. Mediale Praktiken des Sehens und Hörens. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, B., Spöhrer, M., & Stock, R. (2021). Rethinking assistive technologies. Users, environments, digital media and app practices of hearing. Nanoethics. Studies of New and Emerging Technologies, 15(o. H.), o. S. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-020-00381-5. Zugegriffen: 5. März 2021.

  • Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability. From theory to practice (2. Aufl.). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, K. (2018). Material culture, technology, and the body in disability history. In M. A. Rembis, C. Kudlick, & K. E. Nielsen (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of disability history (S. 125–141). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointon, A., Davies, C., & Masefield, P. (Hrsg.). (1997). Framed: Interrogating disability in the media. British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim. Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, P. (2003). Zum Bild behinderter Menschen in den Medien. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, o. Jg.(B 08), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renggli, C. (2006). Die Unterscheidungen des Bildes zum Ereignis machen. Zur Bildanalyse mit Werkzeugen von Luhmann und Foucault. In S. Maasen, T. Mayerhauser, & C. Renggli (Hrsg.), Bilder als Diskurse – Bilddiskurse (S. 181–198). Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. (2011). Reading embodied citizenship. Disability narrative and the body politic. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, S. P. (1998). The first century of disability portrayal in film. An analysis of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 31(4), 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandahl, C., Auslander, P., & Phelan, P. (Hrsg.). (2006). Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillmeier, M. (2010). Rethinking disability. Bodies senses and things. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Waldschmidt, A. (2012). Disability Studies. (Nicht-)Behinderung anders denken. In S. Moebius (Hrsg.), Kultur. Von den Cultural Studies bis zu den Visual Studies. Eine Einführung (S. 128–150). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriempf, A. (2001). (Re)fusing the amputated body: An interactionist bridge for feminism and disability. Hypatia, 16(4), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (1997). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? In L. Barton, & M. Oliver (Hrsg.), Disability studies: Past, present and future (S. 217–233). The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2012). Critical disability studies. Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Hrsg.), Routledge Handbook of disability studies (S. 30–41). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2017). Border crossing. The technologies of disability and desire. In A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, & M. Ingwersen (Hrsg.), Culture – Theory – Disability. Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies (S. 137–152). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2009). Zerbrochene Schönheit. Essays über Kunst, Ästhetik und Behinderung. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, C. R., & Enns, A. (Hrsg.). (2001). Screening disability. University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2001). Re-Engaging the body. Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment. Public Culture, 13(3), 367–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tacke, A. (2016). Blind Spots – Eine Filmgeschichte der Blindheit vom frühen Stummfilm bis in die Gegenwart. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervooren, A. (2003). Der verletzliche Körper. Überlegungen zu einer Systematik der Disability Studies. In A. Waldschmidt (Hrsg.), Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Disability Studies. Tagungsdokumentation (S. 37–48). Bifos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory. In S. Tremain (Hrsg.), Foucault and the government of disability (S. 1–24). University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Very Special Episodes. (2014). Regie: Cherryl Green & Caitlin Wood. https://vimeo.com/113341943. Zugegriffen: 15. Okt. 2020.

  • Vital Signs: Crip culture talks back. (1995). Regie: Sharon Snyder & David Mitchell. DVD Brace Yourselves Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A. (2005). Disability Studies: Individuelles, soziales und/oder kulturelles Modell von Behinderung. Psychologie & Gesellschaftskritik, 29(1), 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A. (2007). Macht – Wissen – Körper. Anschlüsse an Michel Foucault in den Disability Studies. In A. Waldschmidt, & W. Schneider (Hrsg.), Disability Studies, Kultursoziologie und Soziologie der Behinderung: Erkundungen in einem neuen Forschungsfeld (S. 55–77). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A. (2017). Disability goes cultural. The cultural model of disability as an analytical tool. In A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, & M. Ingwersen (Hrsg.), Culture – Theory – Disability. Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies (S. 19–27). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A. (2018). Disability – Culture – Society: Strengths and weaknesses of a cultural model of dis/ability. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research/Revue européenne de recherche sur le handicap, 12(2), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A. (2019). Why critical disability studies needs a cultural model of dis/ability. In K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent, & R. Robertson (Hrsg.), Interdisciplinary approaches to disability. Looking towards the future. Bd. 2 (S. 71–79). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H., & Ingwersen, M. (Hrsg.). (2017). Culture – Theory – Disability. Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldschmidt, A., & Schneider, W. (2007). Disability Studies und Soziologie der Behinderung. Kultursoziologische Grenzgänge – Eine Einführung. In A. Waldschmidt, & W. Schneider (Hrsg.), Disability Studies, Kultursoziologie und Soziologie der Behinderung. Erkundungen in einem neuen Forschungsfeld (S. 9–31). transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • What It Is like To Be My Mother. (Polen 2007). Regie: Norah McGettigan. Wajda Studio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemer, G. (2008). Verletzbare Orte. Entwurf einer praktischen Ästhetik. diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medienwissenschaften, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Deutschland

    Beate Ochsner

Authors
  1. Beate Ochsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate Ochsner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland

    Anne Waldschmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ochsner, B. (2022). Kulturwissenschaftliche Disability Studies. In: Waldschmidt, A. (eds) Handbuch Disability Studies. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18925-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18925-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17537-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18925-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation