Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling traits and method effects as latent variables

  • Chapter
Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Campbell and Fiske (1959) proposed multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) designs for the validation of measurement instruments. In these designs each of several constructs (traits) are measured with the same set of methods. According to Campbell (1959),discriminant validity is supported if the trait under investigation can be distinguished from other traits, andconvergent validity is achieved if different measurement methods yield similar results in measuring the same trait. Multiple methods are also often used in order to improve the precision of the measurement of constructs. Examples are using oral and written exams for assessing mathematical knowledge, self- and peer ratings for measuring personality constructs, or positively and negatively worded items for the measurement of well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Borsboom, Denny, Gideon Mellenbergh, and Jaap van Heerden. 2003. The Theoretical Status of Latent Variables.Psychological Review 110: 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, Michael. 2000. A Multitrait-Multimethod Model with Minimal Assumptions. Psychometrika 65: 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, Michael, Tanja Lischetzke, Fridtjof W. Nussbeck, and Lisa I. Trierweiler. 2003. Separating Trait Effects from Trait-Specific Method Effects in Multitrait- Multimethod Models: A Multiple-Indicator CT-C(M-1) Model.Psychological Methods 8: 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Seymour. 1983. Aggregation and Beyond: Some Basic Issues on the Prediction of Behavior.Journal of Personality 51: 360–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Seymour. 1986. Does Aggregation Produce Spuriously High Estimates of Behavior Stability?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 1199–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, Karl G. 1974. Analyzing Psychological Data by Structural Analysis of Covari- ance Matrices. InContemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, eds. Richard C. Atkinson, David H. Krantz, R. Duncan Luce, and Patrick Suppes, 1–56. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, David A. and Deborah A. Kashy. 1992. Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix by Confirmatory Factor Analysis.Psychological Bulletin 112: 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert W. 1989. Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: Many Problems and a Few Solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement 13: 335361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert W. and Michael Bailey. 1991. Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative Models.Applied Psychological Measurement 15: 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert W., Barbara M. Byrne, and Rhonda Craven. 1992. Overcoming Problems in Confirmatory Factor Analyses of MTMM data: The Correlated Uniqueness Model and Factorial Invariance.Multivariate Behavioral Research 27: 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert W. and David Grayson. 1995. Latent Variable Models of Multitrait- Multimethod Data. InStructural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues and Applications, ed. Rick H. Hoyle, 177–198. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, Michael K. 1984. Psychometric Properties of Subordinate Ratings of Managerial Performance.Personnel Psychology 37: 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, Melvin R. 1966. The Axioms and Principal Results of Classical Test Theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, Steffi and Rolf Steyer. 2010. Modeling Common Traits and Method Effects in Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research 45: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, Steffi, Rolf Steyer, and Katrin Kraus. 2008. Modelling Method Effects as Individual Causal Effects.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 171: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, Rolf. 2001. Classical Test Theory. InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Logic of Inquiry and Research Design, eds. Charles Ragin and Thomas D. Cook, 481–520. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, Keith F. 1985. Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data.Applied Psychological Measurement 9: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Donald W. 1975. Probability Spaces, Hilbert Spaces, and the Axioms of Test Theory. Psychometrika 40: 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Otto-Friedrich-University Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Steffi Pohl (Postdoctoral research fellow in the National Educational Panel Study)

  2. Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Rolf Steyer (Professor, Chair of the Department of Methodology and Evaluation Research)

Authors
  1. Steffi Pohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rolf Steyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Political Science, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Samuel Salzborn

  2. Institute of Sociology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Eldad Davidov

  3. Faculty of Sociology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

    Jost Reinecke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pohl, S., Steyer, R. (2012). Modeling traits and method effects as latent variables. In: Salzborn, S., Davidov, E., Reinecke, J. (eds) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation