Zusammenfassung
Grassrootskampagnen wurden in der Vergangenheit vor allem von den traditionellen intermediären Akteuren betrieben, von Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NGOs) und Verbänden. Das Internet ermöglicht nun auch einzelnen Personen und kleinen Organisationen Grassrootskampagnen zu initiieren.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Baumgartner, Frank R./Jones, Bryan D. (1993): Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL [u. a.]: University of Chicago Press.
Bimber, Broce (2003): Information and American dcmocracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press.
Campact (2011): Transparanzbericht 2011. Verden. http://www.campact.de/campact/uebercampact/finanzen/, 24.9.2012.
Campact (2010): Transparcnzbericht 2010. Verden. http://www.campact.dc/campactluebercampactlfinanzen/. 24.9.2012.
Carty, Victoria (2010): New Information Communication Technologies and Grassroots Mobilization. In: Information, Communication & Society,13, 2, S. 155–173
Carty, Victoria (2011): Multi-Issuc, Intemet-Mediated Interest Organizations and their Implications for US Politics: A Case ofMoveOn.org. In: Social Movement Studies, 10, 3, S. 265–282
Chadwick., Andrew (2007): Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity. In: Political Communication, 24, 3, S. 283–301
Chadwick., Andrew (2006): Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York., NY: Oxford University Press.
Cornfield, Michael (2002): Politics moves online. Campaigning and the internet, New York, NY: Century Foundation Press.
Flanagin, Andrew J./Stohl, Cynthia/Bimber, Bruce (2006): Modeling the Structure of Collective Action. In: Communication Monographs, 73,1, S. 29–54
Inder Smitten, Susanne (2008): Political Potential and Capabilities ofOnline Communities. In: German Policy Studies, 4, 4, S. 33–62.
Jones, Bryan D./Baumgartner, Frank R. (2005): Tbe politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. Chicago, IL. [u. a.]: University of Chicago Press.
Karpf, David (2009): Tbc Moveon Effect: Disruptive Innovation within the Interest Group Ecology of American Politics (American Political Science Association (APSA) 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper), http://ssrn.comIabstracFI451465, 24.9.2012.
Kavada, Anastasia (2009): CoUective action and the social web: Comparing the architecture of Avaaz. org and Openesf.net, in: Carpcntier, Nico etat. (Hrsg.): Communicative approaches to politics and ethics in Europe: Tbc intellectual work oftbe 2009 European media and communication doctoral summer school. Tartu, Estland: University ofTartu Press, S. 129–140
Kavada, Anastasia (2009b): Engagement, Bonding and ldentity Across Multiple Platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouThbc and MySpace. (paper prepared far the 2009 General Confcrence of the European Consortium for Political Research (EePR) Potsdam, Germany, 10–12 September 2009), http://internet-politics.cies.iscte.pt/spip.php?article284,20.3.2012
Keeler, John T.S. (1993): Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making. In: Comparative Political Studies, 25, 4, S. 433–486
Kingdon, lohn W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA/Toronto, Canada: Little, Brown and Company.
Le Grignou, Brigine/Patou, Charles (2004): ATTAC(k)ing expertise: does the internet really dcmocratize knowledge?, in: van de Dank, Wim/Loader, Brian D./ Nixon, Paul G. (Hrsg.): Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens, and Social Movements. London, UK: Routledge, S. 164–179
Postmes, Tom/Brunsting, Suzanne (2002): Collective Action in the Age ofthe Internet: Mass Communication and Online Mobilization. In: Social Science Computer Review, 20, 3, S. 290–301
Van Laer, lerocn/Van Aelst, Pcter (2010): Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires. In: Information, Communication & Society, 13, 8, S. 1146–1171
Wclaratna, Dcepthi (2009): Globalization in Action: ’Avooz’. In: Immediacy, Vol. 11, Fa112009, http://immediacy.mc/immediacy/09/springlprojects/global/ avaaz.html, 24.9.2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Voss, K. (2013). Campact & Co Wie Hybridorganisationen das Grassrootscampaigning verändern. In: Speth, R. (eds) Grassroots-Campaigning. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18876-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18876-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16262-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18876-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)