Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Germanistische Symposien ((GERMSYMP))

  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

A powerful new myth of freedom thrived among artists and their patrons in Europe and America at the outset of the modern Age of Revolutions. For many reasons, ideals of liberty and constitutional government were coupled with good judgment and taste as reflected in the art, politics, and life style of Classical antiquity — a period then studied with unprecedented archaeological and philological intensity. Simply put, Neoclassic style presented the face and self-image of the first moderns, who, because of the clear merits they perceived and vested in ancient works, made of it a guide and norm. It filled a sore need and was quickly assimilated into the very fabric of government and manners, as well as the visual imagination.

This paper enlarges upon arguments introduced in my studies on Blake (n20), steel pens (n26), and the political use of styles, »Neoclasicism, the Art Style of Republican Nationalism,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century: Transactions of the Seventh International Congress on the Enlightenment, Budapest, 1987, 265, 1989, 1439–42. N. B. The arguments in the text and notes are supplemented by representative illustrations described in the Addendum and by a sampling of relevant quotations in the Appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Neoclassicism: L. Hautecoeur, Rome et la renaissance de l’antiquité à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, Paris, 1912;

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Praz, Gusto neoclassico: Contributi alla storia della civiltà europea, Florence, 1940;

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Kaufmann, Architecture in the Age of Reason, Cambridge, 1955;

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Rosenblum, The International Style of 1800: A Study in Linear Abstraction, thesis, 1956;

    Google Scholar 

  5. idem, Transformations in Late Eighteenth Century Art, Princeton, 1967;

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Honour, Neo-classicism, Middlesex, 1968;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winckelmann sources: J. J. Winckelmann, Sämtliche Werke, ed. J. Eiselein, Donaueschingen, 1825–29, 12 v. in 6;

    Google Scholar 

  8. idem, Briefe, ed. H. Diepolder and W. Rehm, Berlin 1952–57, 4 v.;

    Google Scholar 

  9. idem, Kleine Schriften, ed. W. Rehm, intr. H. Sichtermann, Berlin, 1968;

    Google Scholar 

  10. idem, Unbekannte Schriften: Antiquarische Relationen und Beschreibungen der Villa Albani, eds. S. von Moisy, H. Sichtermann, and L. Tavernier, Munich, 1986;

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. W. Goethe, Winckelmann und sein Jahrhundert in Briefe und Aufsätzen, Tübingen, 1805;

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Justi, Winckelmann und seine Zeitgenossen, 1866;

    Google Scholar 

  13. see, for example, passim, J. J. Winckelmann, Gedanken über die Nachahmung der griechischen Werke in der Mahlerey und Bildhauerkunst, Dresden, 1755, I, par.3;

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Irwin, ed., Winckelmann Writings on Art, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. C. Hatfield, Winckelmann and His German Critics 1755–1781: a Prelude to the Classical, New York, 1943;

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Waetzoldt, Johann Joachim Winckelmann: Der Begründer des deutschen Kunstwissenschaft, 3rd ed., Leipzig, 1946;

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Bosshard, Winckelmann: Aesthetik der Mitte, Zurich, 1960, H. C. Hatfield, Aesthetic Paganism in German Literature, from Winckelmann to the Death of Goethe, Cambridge, Mass., 1964;

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Fontius, Winckelmann und die französische Aufklärung, Berlin, 1968;

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Fuhrmann, »Winckelmann, ein deutsches Symbol,« Die neue Rundschau, 83, 1972, 265–83;

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Heres, »Winckelmann, Bernini, Bellori: Betrachtungen zur Nachahmung der Alten,« Forschungen und Berichte. Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, 19, 1979, 9–16;

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Howard, »Winckelmann’s Daemon: The Scholar as Critic, Chronicler, and Historian,« in idem, Antiquity Restored, Vienna, 1990, 162–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Michaelis, Ancient Marbles in Great Britain, tr. C. A. M. Fennell, Cambridge, 1882;

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Pietrangeli, Scavi e scoperte di antichità sotto il pontificato de Pio VI, Rome 1958;

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.C. Vermeule, European Art and the Classical Past, Cambridge, 1964;

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Howard, »The Antiquarian Market in Rome and the Rise of Neo-Classicism: A Basis for Canova’s New Classics,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 151–55, 1976, 1057–68;

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Greenhalgh, The Classical Tradition in Art, New York, 1978;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roman ecclesiastic Jesuit-English-Transalpine politics: L. Pastor, Geschichte der Päpste seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters, Freiburg, 1901–33, 16 v.;

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Lewis, Connoisseurs and Secret Agents in Eighteenth Century Rome, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. B. Visconti, Il museo Pio-Clementino descritto, I, Rome, 1782;

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Pietrangeli, »Il museo Clementino Vaticano,« Atti della pontificia accademia romana di archeologia, rendiconti, 27/1–2, 1951–52, 87–109;

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Howard, »An Antiquarian Handlist and Beginnings of the Pio-Clementino,« Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7/1, 1973, 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cavaceppi: B. Cavaceppi, I: Raccolta d’antiche statue, busti, bassirilievi ed altre sculture ristaurate, Rome, 1768–72, 3 v.;

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Noack, »Bartolomeo Cavaceppi,« in U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Leipzig, 1907–50, VI, 210;

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Howard, Bartolomeo Cavaceppi, Eighteenth-Century Restorer (1958), New York, 1982;

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cardinal Albani: D. Strocchi, Disegni de vita Alexandri Albani Cardinalis, Rome, 1790;

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. Noack, »Der Kardinals Albani Beziehungen zu Künstlern,« Cicerone, 16, 1924, 402–13, 451–59;

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Cagiano de Azevedo, Il gusto nel restauro delle opere d’arte antiche, Rome, 1948;

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. C. Alberts, Benjamin West: A Biography, Boston, 1978, 34f., 424.

    Google Scholar 

  39. French Academy in Paris and Rome: Correspondance des directeurs de l’Académie de France à Rome, eds. A. de Montaiglon and J. Guiffrey, Paris, 1887–1908, 17 v.;

    Google Scholar 

  40. N. Pevsner, Academies of Art Past and Present, Cambridge, 1940;

    Google Scholar 

  41. David-Vien circle: J. Locquin, La peinture d’histoire en France de 1747 à 1785 (1912), Paris, 1978;

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. Hautecoeur, Louis David, Paris, 1954;

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. and G. Wildenstein, Louis David, Recueil de documents complémentaires au cataloque complet de l’oeuvre de l’artiste, Paris, 1973;

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Schnapper, David témoin de son temps, Fribourg, 1980;

    Google Scholar 

  45. Diderot, Delacroix, Baudelaire, and Rococo-Neoclassic styles: Diderot: Salons, eds. J. Seznec and J. Adhémar, Oxford, 1957;

    Google Scholar 

  46. »Meretricious charms and emasculated forms devoid of any touch of nature sufficed for pictures that were cast in the mould, without original invention, and without any of the simple graces by which the works of the primitive schools endure… [David] became aware of the dullness and weakness of the shameful productions of the period… It was through his influence that the style of Herculaneum and Pompeii replaced the bastard Pompadour style… It is plain that everything still derives from him and from his principles« (E. Delacroix, The Journal of Eugène Delacroix, tr. L. Norton, London, 1951, 398 f.).

    Google Scholar 

  47. David, Watteau, and Rococo eroticism: D. Posner, Antoine Watteau, Ithaca, 1984;

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. Howard, »Watteau’s Capriccio with Harlequin and Columbine: A Rude and Subtle Awakening,« in Visions: Essays on the Poetic Imagination in Art, ed. S. Howard, Davis, 1989, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Napoleonic Imperial Classicism: F. H. Taylor, The Taste of Angels, Boston, 1948, 540ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  50. M.-L. Biver, Le Paris de Napoléon, Paris, 1963;

    Google Scholar 

  51. F. Boyer, Le monde des arts en Italie et la France de la Révolution et de l’Empire, Turin, 1970;

    Google Scholar 

  52. F. Haskell and N. Penny, Taste and the Antique, New Haven, 1981, 110ff.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Italo-Transalpine Classical scholarship: J. E. Sandys, A History of Classical Scholarship, Cambridge, 1921;

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Ladendorf, Antikenstudium und Antikenkopie, Berlin, 2nd ed., 1958;

    Google Scholar 

  55. G. Daniel, Origins and Growth of Archaeology, Harmondsworth, 1967;

    Google Scholar 

  56. R. Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship from 1300 to 1850, Oxford, 1976;

    Google Scholar 

  57. British, Baltic, Danubian, Transalpine, and Spanish Classicism: E. von Sydow, Die Kultur des deutschen Klassizismus, Berlin, 1926;

    Google Scholar 

  58. F. Noack, Das Deutschtum in Rom seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters (1927), Aalen, 1974;

    Google Scholar 

  59. R. Zeitler, Klassizmus und Utopia: Interpretationen zu Werken von David, Canova, Carstens, Thorvaldsen, Stockholm, 1954;

    Google Scholar 

  60. E. K. Waterhouse, »The British Contribution to the Neo-Classical Style in Painting,« Proceedings of the British Academy, 40, 1954, 57–74;

    Google Scholar 

  61. E. P. Canalis, Escultura Neo-classica Española, Madrid, 1958;

    Google Scholar 

  62. D. Irwin, English Neoclassical Art: Studies in Inspiration and Taste, Greenwich, Conn., 1966;

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. W. Janson, »German Neo-Classic Sculpture in International Perspective,« Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin, 33/3, 1972, 4–22;

    Google Scholar 

  64. F. G. Pariset, l’art néoclassique, Paris, 1974;

    Google Scholar 

  65. S. Howard, »Archaism and Attitudes in Italianate Neo-Classic Sculpture,« in La scultura nel XIX secolo (1979), ed. H. W. Janson, Bologna, 1984, 9–16;

    Google Scholar 

  66. R. Rosenblum and H. W. Janson, 19th Century Art, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Voltaire, Theater, Pompeii, and Lisbon: F. M. A. Voltaire, Candide, ou l’optimisme, Basle, Amsterdam, 1759;

    Google Scholar 

  68. S. Howard, »The Revival of Ancient Archaic Art in the Late Eighteenth Century and the Use of Archaizing Postures and Modes in Drama and Living Sculptures,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 192, 1980, 1453–1460;

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Seznec, »Herculaneum and Pompeii in French Literature of the Eighteenth Century,« Archaeology, 2, 1949, 150–58;

    Google Scholar 

  70. W. Leppmann, Pompeii in Fact and Fiction, London, 1968;

    Google Scholar 

  71. Blake and Gothic revival: B. H. Macklin, A Father’s Memoirs of His Child, London, 1806, 42ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  72. R. R. Easson, »Blake and the Gothic,« and E. J. Rose, »The ›Gothicized Imagination‹ of ›Michelangelo Blake‹,« in Blake in His Time, eds. R. N. Essick and D. Pearce, Bloomington, Ind., 1978;

    Google Scholar 

  73. S. Howard, »Blake, Classicism, Gothicism, and Nationalism,« Colby Library Quarterly, 21/4, 1985, 165–97.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Overbeck and Gothic Revival: K. Andrews, The Nazarenes: A Brotherhood of German Painters in Rome, Oxford, 1964;

    Google Scholar 

  75. L. Eitner, ed., Neoclassicism and Romanticism 1780–1850: I. Enlightenment/Revolution, Englewood Cliffs, 1970, II, 33 ff. (Overback’s colleague Pforr condemning Academy teachers);

    Google Scholar 

  76. Neo-Gothicism: C. L. Eastlake, A History of the Gothic Revival, London, 1872;

    Google Scholar 

  77. K. Clark, The Gothic Revival, an Essay in the History of Taste, London, 1928;

    Google Scholar 

  78. W. D. Robson-Scott, The Literary Background of the Gothic Revival in Germany: A Chapter in the History of Taste, Oxford, 1965;

    Google Scholar 

  79. G. German, Gothic Revival in Europe and Britain: Sources, Influences and Ideas, tr. G. Onn, London, 1972;

    Google Scholar 

  80. H. Honour, Romanticism, New York, 1977, ch.4.

    Google Scholar 

  81. F. Licht, Goya: The Origins of the Modern Temper in Art, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Scotch Renaissance, Homer, and Macpherson: D. Wiebenson, »Subjects from Homer’s Iliad in Neoclassical Art,« Art Bulletin, 46, 1964, 23–37;

    Google Scholar 

  83. Parliament Buildings: Architecture in America: A Battle of Styles, eds. W. A. Coles and H. H. Reed, New York, 1961;

    Google Scholar 

  84. J. Mordaunt Crook, The Dilemma of Style: Architectural Ideas from the Picturesque to the Post-Modern, London, 1987;

    Google Scholar 

  85. Neoclassicism and mass production: D. Irwin, »Neo-Classical Design: Industry Plunders Antiquity,« Apollo, 96, 1972, 288–97;

    Google Scholar 

  86. S. Howard, »The Steel Pen and the Modern Line of Beauty,« Technology and Culture, 26/4, 1985, 785–98.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Neoclassicism, minor arts, and writing: T. Tomkins, The Beauties of Writing, Exemplified in a Variety of Plain and Ornamental Penmanship Designed to Excite Emulation in this Valuable Art, London, 1777;

    Google Scholar 

  88. H. Hawley, Neo Classicism: Style and Motif, catalogue, New York, 1964;

    Google Scholar 

  89. Beaux-Arts Neoclassicism and Empire: S. Nilsson, European Architecture in India 1750–1850, New York, 1968;

    Google Scholar 

  90. J. Mordaunt Crook, The Greek Revival: Neo Classical Attitudes in British Architecture, 1760–1870, London, 1972;

    Google Scholar 

  91. J. Morris, Stones of Empire: The Buildings of the Raj, Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Greco-Roman and Baroque imperialism: J. B. Ward Perkins, Roman Imperial Architecture, New York, 1981;

    Google Scholar 

  93. W. Oakeshott, Classical Inspiration in Medieval Art, London, 1959;

    Google Scholar 

  94. F. M. Gagnon, La conversion del’image: Un aspect de la mission des Jesuites auprès des Indiens du Canada aux XVII siècle, Montreal, 1975;

    Google Scholar 

  95. J. Pla, The Hispano-Guarini Baroque, Washington, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  96. For the images and their context, see, further, F. Antal, Fuseli Studies, London, 1956, 71–74;

    Google Scholar 

  97. I. M. Jaffe, Trumbull: The Declaration of Independence, New York, 1976, John Flaxman, catalogue, ed. D. Bindman, London, 1979 (influence and afterlife of Flaxman’s designs and publications);

    Google Scholar 

  98. P. Bordes, Le Serment du Jeu de Paume de Jacques-Louis David, Paris, 1893 (nude and clothed figures in preparatory sketches for the finished drawing and unfinished canvas;

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wilhelm Voßkamp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howard, S. (1993). Freedom, Neoclassicism, and Republican Nationalism. In: Voßkamp, W. (eds) Klassik im Vergleich Normativität und Historizität europäischer Klassiken. Germanistische Symposien. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05558-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05558-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-00868-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-05558-3

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics