Abstract
A powerful new myth of freedom thrived among artists and their patrons in Europe and America at the outset of the modern Age of Revolutions. For many reasons, ideals of liberty and constitutional government were coupled with good judgment and taste as reflected in the art, politics, and life style of Classical antiquity — a period then studied with unprecedented archaeological and philological intensity. Simply put, Neoclassic style presented the face and self-image of the first moderns, who, because of the clear merits they perceived and vested in ancient works, made of it a guide and norm. It filled a sore need and was quickly assimilated into the very fabric of government and manners, as well as the visual imagination.
This paper enlarges upon arguments introduced in my studies on Blake (n20), steel pens (n26), and the political use of styles, »Neoclasicism, the Art Style of Republican Nationalism,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century: Transactions of the Seventh International Congress on the Enlightenment, Budapest, 1987, 265, 1989, 1439–42. N. B. The arguments in the text and notes are supplemented by representative illustrations described in the Addendum and by a sampling of relevant quotations in the Appendix.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Neoclassicism: L. Hautecoeur, Rome et la renaissance de l’antiquité à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, Paris, 1912;
M. Praz, Gusto neoclassico: Contributi alla storia della civiltà europea, Florence, 1940;
E. Kaufmann, Architecture in the Age of Reason, Cambridge, 1955;
R. Rosenblum, The International Style of 1800: A Study in Linear Abstraction, thesis, 1956;
idem, Transformations in Late Eighteenth Century Art, Princeton, 1967;
H. Honour, Neo-classicism, Middlesex, 1968;
Winckelmann sources: J. J. Winckelmann, Sämtliche Werke, ed. J. Eiselein, Donaueschingen, 1825–29, 12 v. in 6;
idem, Briefe, ed. H. Diepolder and W. Rehm, Berlin 1952–57, 4 v.;
idem, Kleine Schriften, ed. W. Rehm, intr. H. Sichtermann, Berlin, 1968;
idem, Unbekannte Schriften: Antiquarische Relationen und Beschreibungen der Villa Albani, eds. S. von Moisy, H. Sichtermann, and L. Tavernier, Munich, 1986;
J. W. Goethe, Winckelmann und sein Jahrhundert in Briefe und Aufsätzen, Tübingen, 1805;
C. Justi, Winckelmann und seine Zeitgenossen, 1866;
see, for example, passim, J. J. Winckelmann, Gedanken über die Nachahmung der griechischen Werke in der Mahlerey und Bildhauerkunst, Dresden, 1755, I, par.3;
D. Irwin, ed., Winckelmann Writings on Art, London, 1972.
H. C. Hatfield, Winckelmann and His German Critics 1755–1781: a Prelude to the Classical, New York, 1943;
W. Waetzoldt, Johann Joachim Winckelmann: Der Begründer des deutschen Kunstwissenschaft, 3rd ed., Leipzig, 1946;
W. Bosshard, Winckelmann: Aesthetik der Mitte, Zurich, 1960, H. C. Hatfield, Aesthetic Paganism in German Literature, from Winckelmann to the Death of Goethe, Cambridge, Mass., 1964;
M. Fontius, Winckelmann und die französische Aufklärung, Berlin, 1968;
M. Fuhrmann, »Winckelmann, ein deutsches Symbol,« Die neue Rundschau, 83, 1972, 265–83;
G. Heres, »Winckelmann, Bernini, Bellori: Betrachtungen zur Nachahmung der Alten,« Forschungen und Berichte. Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, 19, 1979, 9–16;
S. Howard, »Winckelmann’s Daemon: The Scholar as Critic, Chronicler, and Historian,« in idem, Antiquity Restored, Vienna, 1990, 162–74.
A. Michaelis, Ancient Marbles in Great Britain, tr. C. A. M. Fennell, Cambridge, 1882;
C. Pietrangeli, Scavi e scoperte di antichità sotto il pontificato de Pio VI, Rome 1958;
C.C. Vermeule, European Art and the Classical Past, Cambridge, 1964;
S. Howard, »The Antiquarian Market in Rome and the Rise of Neo-Classicism: A Basis for Canova’s New Classics,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 151–55, 1976, 1057–68;
M. Greenhalgh, The Classical Tradition in Art, New York, 1978;
Roman ecclesiastic Jesuit-English-Transalpine politics: L. Pastor, Geschichte der Päpste seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters, Freiburg, 1901–33, 16 v.;
L. Lewis, Connoisseurs and Secret Agents in Eighteenth Century Rome, London, 1961.
G. B. Visconti, Il museo Pio-Clementino descritto, I, Rome, 1782;
C. Pietrangeli, »Il museo Clementino Vaticano,« Atti della pontificia accademia romana di archeologia, rendiconti, 27/1–2, 1951–52, 87–109;
S. Howard, »An Antiquarian Handlist and Beginnings of the Pio-Clementino,« Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7/1, 1973, 40–61.
Cavaceppi: B. Cavaceppi, I: Raccolta d’antiche statue, busti, bassirilievi ed altre sculture ristaurate, Rome, 1768–72, 3 v.;
F. Noack, »Bartolomeo Cavaceppi,« in U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Leipzig, 1907–50, VI, 210;
S. Howard, Bartolomeo Cavaceppi, Eighteenth-Century Restorer (1958), New York, 1982;
Cardinal Albani: D. Strocchi, Disegni de vita Alexandri Albani Cardinalis, Rome, 1790;
F. Noack, »Der Kardinals Albani Beziehungen zu Künstlern,« Cicerone, 16, 1924, 402–13, 451–59;
M. Cagiano de Azevedo, Il gusto nel restauro delle opere d’arte antiche, Rome, 1948;
R. C. Alberts, Benjamin West: A Biography, Boston, 1978, 34f., 424.
French Academy in Paris and Rome: Correspondance des directeurs de l’Académie de France à Rome, eds. A. de Montaiglon and J. Guiffrey, Paris, 1887–1908, 17 v.;
N. Pevsner, Academies of Art Past and Present, Cambridge, 1940;
David-Vien circle: J. Locquin, La peinture d’histoire en France de 1747 à 1785 (1912), Paris, 1978;
L. Hautecoeur, Louis David, Paris, 1954;
D. and G. Wildenstein, Louis David, Recueil de documents complémentaires au cataloque complet de l’oeuvre de l’artiste, Paris, 1973;
A. Schnapper, David témoin de son temps, Fribourg, 1980;
Diderot, Delacroix, Baudelaire, and Rococo-Neoclassic styles: Diderot: Salons, eds. J. Seznec and J. Adhémar, Oxford, 1957;
»Meretricious charms and emasculated forms devoid of any touch of nature sufficed for pictures that were cast in the mould, without original invention, and without any of the simple graces by which the works of the primitive schools endure… [David] became aware of the dullness and weakness of the shameful productions of the period… It was through his influence that the style of Herculaneum and Pompeii replaced the bastard Pompadour style… It is plain that everything still derives from him and from his principles« (E. Delacroix, The Journal of Eugène Delacroix, tr. L. Norton, London, 1951, 398 f.).
David, Watteau, and Rococo eroticism: D. Posner, Antoine Watteau, Ithaca, 1984;
S. Howard, »Watteau’s Capriccio with Harlequin and Columbine: A Rude and Subtle Awakening,« in Visions: Essays on the Poetic Imagination in Art, ed. S. Howard, Davis, 1989, 21–23.
Napoleonic Imperial Classicism: F. H. Taylor, The Taste of Angels, Boston, 1948, 540ff.;
M.-L. Biver, Le Paris de Napoléon, Paris, 1963;
F. Boyer, Le monde des arts en Italie et la France de la Révolution et de l’Empire, Turin, 1970;
F. Haskell and N. Penny, Taste and the Antique, New Haven, 1981, 110ff.
Italo-Transalpine Classical scholarship: J. E. Sandys, A History of Classical Scholarship, Cambridge, 1921;
H. Ladendorf, Antikenstudium und Antikenkopie, Berlin, 2nd ed., 1958;
G. Daniel, Origins and Growth of Archaeology, Harmondsworth, 1967;
R. Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship from 1300 to 1850, Oxford, 1976;
British, Baltic, Danubian, Transalpine, and Spanish Classicism: E. von Sydow, Die Kultur des deutschen Klassizismus, Berlin, 1926;
F. Noack, Das Deutschtum in Rom seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters (1927), Aalen, 1974;
R. Zeitler, Klassizmus und Utopia: Interpretationen zu Werken von David, Canova, Carstens, Thorvaldsen, Stockholm, 1954;
E. K. Waterhouse, »The British Contribution to the Neo-Classical Style in Painting,« Proceedings of the British Academy, 40, 1954, 57–74;
E. P. Canalis, Escultura Neo-classica Española, Madrid, 1958;
D. Irwin, English Neoclassical Art: Studies in Inspiration and Taste, Greenwich, Conn., 1966;
H. W. Janson, »German Neo-Classic Sculpture in International Perspective,« Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin, 33/3, 1972, 4–22;
F. G. Pariset, l’art néoclassique, Paris, 1974;
S. Howard, »Archaism and Attitudes in Italianate Neo-Classic Sculpture,« in La scultura nel XIX secolo (1979), ed. H. W. Janson, Bologna, 1984, 9–16;
R. Rosenblum and H. W. Janson, 19th Century Art, New York, 1984.
Voltaire, Theater, Pompeii, and Lisbon: F. M. A. Voltaire, Candide, ou l’optimisme, Basle, Amsterdam, 1759;
S. Howard, »The Revival of Ancient Archaic Art in the Late Eighteenth Century and the Use of Archaizing Postures and Modes in Drama and Living Sculptures,« Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 192, 1980, 1453–1460;
J. Seznec, »Herculaneum and Pompeii in French Literature of the Eighteenth Century,« Archaeology, 2, 1949, 150–58;
W. Leppmann, Pompeii in Fact and Fiction, London, 1968;
Blake and Gothic revival: B. H. Macklin, A Father’s Memoirs of His Child, London, 1806, 42ff.;
R. R. Easson, »Blake and the Gothic,« and E. J. Rose, »The ›Gothicized Imagination‹ of ›Michelangelo Blake‹,« in Blake in His Time, eds. R. N. Essick and D. Pearce, Bloomington, Ind., 1978;
S. Howard, »Blake, Classicism, Gothicism, and Nationalism,« Colby Library Quarterly, 21/4, 1985, 165–97.
Overbeck and Gothic Revival: K. Andrews, The Nazarenes: A Brotherhood of German Painters in Rome, Oxford, 1964;
L. Eitner, ed., Neoclassicism and Romanticism 1780–1850: I. Enlightenment/Revolution, Englewood Cliffs, 1970, II, 33 ff. (Overback’s colleague Pforr condemning Academy teachers);
Neo-Gothicism: C. L. Eastlake, A History of the Gothic Revival, London, 1872;
K. Clark, The Gothic Revival, an Essay in the History of Taste, London, 1928;
W. D. Robson-Scott, The Literary Background of the Gothic Revival in Germany: A Chapter in the History of Taste, Oxford, 1965;
G. German, Gothic Revival in Europe and Britain: Sources, Influences and Ideas, tr. G. Onn, London, 1972;
H. Honour, Romanticism, New York, 1977, ch.4.
F. Licht, Goya: The Origins of the Modern Temper in Art, New York, 1979.
Scotch Renaissance, Homer, and Macpherson: D. Wiebenson, »Subjects from Homer’s Iliad in Neoclassical Art,« Art Bulletin, 46, 1964, 23–37;
Parliament Buildings: Architecture in America: A Battle of Styles, eds. W. A. Coles and H. H. Reed, New York, 1961;
J. Mordaunt Crook, The Dilemma of Style: Architectural Ideas from the Picturesque to the Post-Modern, London, 1987;
Neoclassicism and mass production: D. Irwin, »Neo-Classical Design: Industry Plunders Antiquity,« Apollo, 96, 1972, 288–97;
S. Howard, »The Steel Pen and the Modern Line of Beauty,« Technology and Culture, 26/4, 1985, 785–98.
Neoclassicism, minor arts, and writing: T. Tomkins, The Beauties of Writing, Exemplified in a Variety of Plain and Ornamental Penmanship Designed to Excite Emulation in this Valuable Art, London, 1777;
H. Hawley, Neo Classicism: Style and Motif, catalogue, New York, 1964;
Beaux-Arts Neoclassicism and Empire: S. Nilsson, European Architecture in India 1750–1850, New York, 1968;
J. Mordaunt Crook, The Greek Revival: Neo Classical Attitudes in British Architecture, 1760–1870, London, 1972;
J. Morris, Stones of Empire: The Buildings of the Raj, Oxford, 1986.
Greco-Roman and Baroque imperialism: J. B. Ward Perkins, Roman Imperial Architecture, New York, 1981;
W. Oakeshott, Classical Inspiration in Medieval Art, London, 1959;
F. M. Gagnon, La conversion del’image: Un aspect de la mission des Jesuites auprès des Indiens du Canada aux XVII siècle, Montreal, 1975;
J. Pla, The Hispano-Guarini Baroque, Washington, 1976.
For the images and their context, see, further, F. Antal, Fuseli Studies, London, 1956, 71–74;
I. M. Jaffe, Trumbull: The Declaration of Independence, New York, 1976, John Flaxman, catalogue, ed. D. Bindman, London, 1979 (influence and afterlife of Flaxman’s designs and publications);
P. Bordes, Le Serment du Jeu de Paume de Jacques-Louis David, Paris, 1893 (nude and clothed figures in preparatory sketches for the finished drawing and unfinished canvas;
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howard, S. (1993). Freedom, Neoclassicism, and Republican Nationalism. In: Voßkamp, W. (eds) Klassik im Vergleich Normativität und Historizität europäischer Klassiken. Germanistische Symposien. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05558-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05558-3_31
Published:
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Print ISBN: 978-3-476-00868-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-476-05558-3
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)