Skip to main content

Ausdrücke und ihre Funktion

  • Chapter
  • 1582 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Philosophische Konzeptionen von Wahrheit zielen auf die Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Wahrheit? Hinter dieser kurzen Frage steht allerdings eine Vielzahl von Fragen in der Metaphysik, Sprachphilosophie, Erkenntnistheorie und Logik, zu denen Wahrheitstheorien Stellung bezogen haben. Es hilft, vier Fragen zu unterscheiden.

  1. 1)

    Wesensfrage: Was ist das Wesen der Wahrheit, das was allen und nur wahren Dingen gemeinsam ist?

  2. 2)

    Gebrauchsfrage: Welchem Zweck dient unser Gebrauch der Worte ›wahr‹ und ›falsch‹?

  3. 3)

    Wertfrage: Hat Wahrheit selbst einen Wert und wenn ja, welchen und warum?

  4. 4)

    Logikfrage: Wie ist mit semantischen Paradoxien — etwa der Lügnerparadoxie — umzugehen, und was sagen sie uns über den Wahrheitsbegriff?

Traditionelle Wahrheitstheorien beantworten seit der Antike gewöhnlich die Wesensfrage. Deflationäre Theorien werten seit Beginn des 20. Jh.s die Wesensfrage ab und rücken die Gebrauchsfrage in den Vordergrund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Armour-Garb, Bradley P./Beall, J. C. (Hg.): Deflationary Truth. Chicago/LaSalle 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John L.: Truth. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume) 24 (1950),111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, Helen/Dodd, Julian (Hg.): Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Francis H.: Essays on Truth and Reality. Oxford 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler: Semantical Paradox. In: Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979),169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Alexis G./Burgess, John P.: Truth. Princeton 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Marian: Correspondence and Disquotation. An Essay on the Nature of Truth. Oxford 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Marian: The Correspondence Theory of Truth (2009). In: Edward N. Zalta (Hg.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/(15.5.2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: Truth and Meaning. In: Synthese 17 (1967),304–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: True to the Facts. In: The Journal ofPhilosophy 66 (1969), 748–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: The Folly of Trying to Define Truth. In: Journal of Philosophy 93/6 (1996), 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, Michael: Realism and Truth. Princeton 21997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, Julian: An Identity Theory of Truth. London 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: Truth. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59 (1959),141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: What is a Theory of Meaning? (II). In: Gareth Evans/John McDowell (Hg.): Truth and Meaning. Oxford 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, Matti: Inconsistent Languages. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2002), 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: Tarski’s Theory of Truth. In: Journal of Philosophy 69 (1972), 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: The Deflationary Conception of Truth. In: Crispin Wright/Graham MacDonald (Hg.): Fact, Science and Value. Oxford 1986, 55–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content. In: Mind 103 (1994),249–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Der Gedanke. In: Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 2 (1918), 58–77 (ND in Günther Patzig [Hg.]: Gottlob Frege. Logische Untersuchungen. Göttingen52003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzberg, Michael: The Liar in Context. In: Philosophical Studies 103 (2001), 217–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, Dorothy L./Camp, Joseph L./Belnap, Nuel D.: A Prosentential Theory of Truth. In: Philosophical Studies 27 (1975),73–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, Jennifer: Truth: The Identity Theory. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (1997),1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul: Truth. Oxford 21998a.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul: Meaning. Oxford 1998b.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, William: Pragmatism. Cambridge, Mass. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, Harold H.: The Nature of Truth. Oxford 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, Richard L.: Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, Mass. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul A.: Outline of a Theory of Truth. In: Journal of Philosophy 72/19 (1975), 690–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künne, Wolfgang: Conceptions of Truth. Oxford 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael P. (Hg.): The Nature of Truth. Cambridge, Mass. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael P. (Hg.): A Functionalist Theory of Truth. In: Ders. 2001, 723–749 [2001a].

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, John M. E.: The Nature of Existence. Vol. 1. Cambridge 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Hg. von Richmond H. Thomasson. New Haven 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George E.: The Nature of Judgment. In: Mind 8/2 (1899),176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George E.: Some Main Problems ofPhilosophy [1910]. London 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Doug: Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2009),387–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Nikolaj J. L. L./Wright, Cory D. (Hg.). Truth and Pluralism. Current Debates. Oxford 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bände 2–4. Cambridge, Mass. 1932–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, Graham: In Contradiction. Oxford 22006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard Van Orman: Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank P.: Facts and Propositions. In: Ders., The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Hg. von Richard Bevan Braithwaite. London 1931,138–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood. In: Ders.: Philosophical Essays. London 1910, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [1918]. In: Robert Charles Marsh (Hg.): Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950. London 1956, 177–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Keith: Universality and the Liar. Cambridge 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skirbekk, Gunnar (Hg.): Wahrheitstheorien: Eine Auswahl aus den Diskussionen über Wahrheit im 20. Jh. Frankfurt a. M. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: Understanding Truth. Oxford 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen. In: Studia Philosophica 1 (1935), 261–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944), 341–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Ralph: The Coherence Theory of Truth. London/New York 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: Tractatus logicophilosophicus. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. In: Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14 (1921), 185–262 (ND Frankfurt a. M. 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Crispin: Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Crispin: Minimalism, Deflationism, Pragmatism, Pluralism. In: Lynch 2001, 751–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, James O.: A Defence of the Coherence Theory of Truth. In: The Journal ofPhilosophical Research 26 (2001), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, George: Propositions. In: Mind 107 (1998),1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, George/Mönnich, Uwe: Property Theories. In: Dov Gabbay/Franz Guenthner (Hg.): Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. IV. Dordrecht 1989, 133–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: Meaning and Necessity. Chicago 21956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max: Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: Frege: Philosophy of Language. London 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: Does Tense Logic Rest on a Mistake? In: Gareth Evans: Collected Papers. Oxford 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Function und Begriff. Vortrag gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medicin und Naturwissenschaft. Jena 1891 (ND in Günther Patzig [Hg.]: Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Göttingen 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892),25–50 (ND in Günther Patzig [Hg.]: Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Göttingen 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung. In: Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1 (1918),58–77 (ND in Günther Patzig [Hg.]: Logische Untersuchungen. Göttingen 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Hg. von Gottfried Gabriel, Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, Christian Thiel und Albert Veraart. Hamburg 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, Peter: Structured Propositions as Types. In: Mind 120 (2011),11–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene/Kratzer, Angelika: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, NY 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofweber, Thomas: Innocent Statements and Their Metaphysically Loaded Counterparts. In: Philosophers’ Imprint 7 (2007),1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul: Truth. Oxford 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jubien, Michael: Propositions and the Objects of Thought. In: Philosophical Studies 104 (2001),47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: On Demonstratives [1977]. In: Josef Almog/John Perry/Howard Wettstein (Hg.): Themes from Kaplan. Oxford 1989, 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Jeffrey: Tense, Modality, and Semantic Values. In: Philosophical Perspectives 17 (2003),195–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Jeffrey: The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: Naming and Necessity. Oxford 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künne, Wolfgang: Hybrid Proper Names. In: Mind 101 (1992),721–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künne, Wolfgang: Conceptions of Truth. Oxford 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: General Semantics. In: Synthese 22 (1970), 18–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: Index, Context, and Content. In: Stig Kanger/Sven Öhman (Hg.): Philosophy and Grammar. Dordrecht 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Robert: The Measure of Mind. In: Mind 103 (1994),131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike: Propositional Attitudes Without Propositions. In: Synthese 135 (2003),77–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George E.: The Nature of Judgment. In: Mind 5 (1980),176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, John: The Problem of the Essential Indexical. In: Nous 13 (1979),3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François: Perspectival Thought. Oxford 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Mark: Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosefeldt, Tobias: ›That‹-Clauses and Non-Nominal Quantification. In: Philosophical Studies 137 (2008), 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, Stephen: The Things We Mean. Oxford 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John: Speech-Acts. Cambridge 1969.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: What is Meaning. Princeton 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: Propositions. In: Delia Graff Fara/Gillian Russell (Hg.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. London 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: Inquiry. Cambridge, Mass. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason: Language in Context: Selected Essays. Oxford 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, Bas: The Scientific Image. Oxford 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, Stephen: Go Figure: A Path Through Fictionalism. In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (2001), 72–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, Herman: The Creative Interpreter: Content Relativism and Assertion. In: Noûs 42/1 (2008), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, Herman/Hawthorne, John: Relativism and Mondadic Truth. Oxford 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, Andy: Epistemic Modals, Relativism, and Assertion. In: Philosophical Studies 133 (2007),1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, Andy/Hawthorne, John/Weatherson, Brian: Epistemic Modals in Context. In: Gerhard Preyer/Georg Peter (Hg.): Contextualism in Philosophy. Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford 2005, 131–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Carpintero, Manuel/Kölbel, Max (Hg.). Relative Truth. Oxford 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzberg, Michael: Context, Content, and Relativism. In: Philosophical Studies 136 (2007),1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales, Steven D. (Hg.): A Companion to Relativism. Malden, Mass. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: Demonstratives. An Essay on the Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals. In: Joseph Almog/John Perry/Howard Wettstein: Themes from Kaplan. Oxford 1989, 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel, Max: Truth Without Objectivity. London 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel, Max: Faultless Disagreement. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104/1 (2004),53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodny, Niko/MacFarlane, John: Ifs and Oughts. In: Journal ofPhilosophy 107/3 (2010),115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kompa, Nikola: The Context-sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (2002), 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 28/6 (2005), 643–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: Index, Context, and Content. In: Kanger, Stig/Öhman, Sven (Hg.): Philosophy and Grammar. Dordrecht 1980,79–100 (nachgedruckt in: David Lewis, Papers in Philosophical Logic. Cambridge 1998, 21–44).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Nonindexical Contextualism. In: Synthese 166 (2009),231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Relativism. In: Delia Graff Fara/Gillian Russell (Hg.): The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy ofLanguage. New York 2012, 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Assessment Sensitivity. Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ninan, Dilip: Semantics and the Objects of Assertion. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (2010), 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platon: Theätet. Hg. von Alexander Becker. Frankfurt a. M. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François: Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Mark: When Truth Gives Out. Oxford 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, Tamina: Judge Dependence, Epistemic Modals, and Predicates of Personal Taste. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 30/4 (2007),487–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherson, Brian: Conditionals and Indexical Relativism. In: Synthese 166 (2009),333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, Michael: The Case for Referential Descriptions. In: Marga Reimer/Anne Bezuidenhout (Hg.): Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford 2004, 280–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, Keith: Reference and Definite Descriptions. In: The Philosophical Review 75 (1966), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschriftfür Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100/1 (1892), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Delia: Descriptions as Predicates. In: Philosophical Studies 102 (2001), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Paul: Meaning. In: The Philosophical Review 66 (1957),377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference. In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1977), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, Peter/Segal, Gabriel: On a Unitary Semantical Analysis for Definite and Indefinite Descriptions. In: Marga Reimer/Anne Bezuidenhout (Hg.): Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford 2004, 420–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, Alexius: Über Gegenstandstheorie. In: Alexius Meinong (Hg.): Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Leipzig 1904, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Stephen: Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Stephen: This, That, and the Other. In: Marga Reimer/Anne Bezuidenhout (Hg.): Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford 2004, 68–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Alex/Smiley, Timothy: Sharvy’s Theory of Descriptions: A Paradigm Subverted. In: Analysis 69 (2009), 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Marga: Donnellan’s Distinction/Kripke’s Test. In: Analysis 58 (1998), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: On Denoting. In: Mind 14 (1905), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: Mr. Strawson on Referring. In: Mind 66 (1957), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand/Whitehead, Alfred North: Principia Mathematica. Cambridge 1910–1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfrid: Presupposing. In: The Philosophical Review 63 (1954),197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvy, Richard: A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions. In: The Philosophical Review 89 (1980), 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter: On Referring. In: Mind 59 (1950), 320–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Zoltán Gendler: Descriptions and Uniqueness. In: Philosophical Studies 101 (2000), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, Howard: Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions. In: Philosophical Studies 40 (1981), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, David: Empty Names. In: Nous 27 (1993),449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler: Referenz und Eigennamen. In: Wolf 1993, 252–273 (engl. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, Keith: Referenz und Kennzeichnungen. In: Wolf 1993,179–207 (engl. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: Frege. Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: Die Kausale Theorie der Namen. In: Wolf 1993,309–336 (engl. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschriftfür Philosophie und philosophische Kritik Neue Folge 100 (1892),25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: Dthat. In: Peter Cole (Hg.): Syntax and Semantics, Vol 9: Pragmatics. New York 1978, 221–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: Name und Notwendigkeit. Frankfurt a. M. 1981 (engl. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart: A System of Logic. London 1843, Buch I, Kap. II, §§ 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelczar, Michael/Rainsbury, Joe: The Indexical Character of Names. In: Synthese 114 (1998),293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: Die Philosophie des logischen Atomismus. In: Ders.: Die Philosophie des Logischen Atomismus. Aufsätze zur Logik und Erkenntnistheorie 1908–1918. München 1979 (engl. 1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, Richard M.: Reference Without Referents. Oxford 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan: Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge, Mass. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John: Proper Names. In: Mind 67 (1958),166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: Beyond Rigidity. The Unfinished Semantic Agenda ofNaming and Necessity. New York 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter F.: Über Referenz. In: Ders.: Logik und Linguistik. München 1974,83–116 (engl. 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Ursula: Eigennamen. Dokumentation einer Kontroverse. Frankfurt a. M. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, David: Indexicals. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015), http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/indexicals (27. 2. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel: Indexicals as Token-Reflexives. In: Mind 107 (1998), 529–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives. In: Joseph Almog/John Perry/Howard Wettstein (Hg.): Themes from Kaplan. New York 1989a, 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: Afterthoughts. In: Joseph Almog/John Perry/Howard Wettstein (Hg.): Themes from Kaplan. New York 1989b, 565–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher: Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (2007), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: Scorekeeping in a Language Game. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1979), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newen, Albert/Schrenk, Markus: Einführung in die Sprachphilosophie. Darmstadt 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, John: The Problem of the Essential Indexical. In: Noûs 13 (1979),3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. New York 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan: Demonstrating and Necessity. In: Philosophical Review 111 (2002),497–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: Understanding Truth. Oxford 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Fred/Fuller, Gary/Stecker, Robert: The Semantics of Fictional Names. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78,2 (1997), 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, David: Empty Names. In: Noûs 27/4(1993), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Ben: Millian Descriptivism. In: Philosophical Studies 133/2 (2007),181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, Gregory: The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, Keith: Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions. In: Synthese 21/3–4 (1970),335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: Frege: Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Anthony: Empty Names and ›Gappy‹ Propositions. In: Philosophical Studies 116/1, (2003), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Anthony: Pretense, Existence, and Fictional Objects. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74/1 (2007), 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, Stacie: The Great Beetle Debate: A Study in Imagining with Names. In: Philosophical Studies 153/2 (2011), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inwagen, Peter van: Creatures of Fiction. In: American Philosophical Quarterly 14/4 (1977), 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: Reference and Existence. The John Locke Lectures. Oxford 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Künne, Wolfgang: Abstrakte Gegenstände. Semantik und Ontologie. Frankfurt a. M. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Marga: The Problem of Empty Names. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79/4 (2001), 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: On Denoting. In: Mind 14/56 (1905), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, Mark: Departing From Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language. London 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, Mark: Reference Without Referents. Oxford 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan: Nonexistence. In: Noûs 32/3 (1998), 277–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solodkoff, Tatjana von: Fictional Realism and Negative Existentials. In: Manuel García-Carpintero/Genoveva Martí (Hg.): Thinking and Talking about Nothing. Oxford 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, Amie: Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, Amie: Speaking of Fictional Characters. In: Dialectica 57, 2 (2003),205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Kendall: Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Mass. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Ulrich: Die Logik der Unbestimmtheiten und Paradoxien. Heidelberg 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, Herman/Lepore, Ernest: Varieties of Quotation. In: Mind 106 (1997), 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: Quotation. In: Ders.: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford 1984, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Carpintero, Manuel: Ostensive Signs: Against the Identity Theory of Quotation. In: The Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Carpintero, Manuel: The Deferred Ostension Theory of Quotation. In: Nous 38 (2004), 674–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Torrente, Mario: Quotation Revisited. In: Philosophical Studies 102 (2001), 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harth, Manfred: Anführung. Ein nicht-sprachliches Mittel der Sprache. Paderborn 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harth, Manfred: Anführung: Mit Exemplifikation zur Denotation. In: Facta Philosophica 6 (2004), 223–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Olaf: Zitierte Zeichenreihen. In: Erkenntnis 44 (1996), 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: The Syntax and Semantics of Quotation. In: Stephen Anderson/Paul Kiparsky (Hg.): A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York 1973, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François: Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, Mass. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Mark: Quotation, Grammar, and Opacity. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (1986), 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka, Paul: Quotation and the Use-Mention Distinction. In: Mind 107 (1998), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka, Paul: The Demonstrative and Identity Theories of Quotation. In: The Journal of Philosophy 103 (2006). 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrenner, Jakob: Zeichen über Zeichen. Heidelberg 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Corey: The Identity Theory of Quotation. In: The Journal ofPhilosophy 89 (1992), 582–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Alexander/Tobin, Emma: Natural Kinds. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Hg.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition). http://www.plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/natural-kinds/(15.5.2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler: Individualism and the Mental. In: Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1979), 73–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, Keith: Kripke and Putnam on Natural Kind Terms. In: Carl Ginet/Sidney Shoemaker (Hg.): Knowledge and Mind. New York/Oxford 1983, 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, John: The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, Mass. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian: The Contingencies of Ambiguity. In: Analysis 67/4 (2007),269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäkel, Frank/Meyer, Uwe: Kategorisierung und Begriffe. In: Achim Stephan/Sven Walter (Hg.): Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaft. Stuttgart/Weimar 2013, 308–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul A.: Name und Notwendigkeit. Frankfurt a. M. 1981 (engl. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt a. M. 1981 (engl. 1962/1969 (revidierte, um ein »Postskriptum« erweiterte Auflage).

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, Joseph: Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Uwe: Glaube und Notwendigkeit. Eine Untersuchung zur Sprachphilosophie, zur Erkenntnistheorie und zur Philosophie des Geistes. Paderborn 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Uwe: Offenheit. Ein Essay über Rationalität, Sprache, Natur und den menschlichen Geist. Münster 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: Realism and Reason. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50/6 (1977),483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: Die Bedeutung von ›Bedeutung‹. Frankfurt a. M. 1979 (engl. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: Vernunft, Wahrheit und Geschichte. Frankfurt a. M. 1990 (engl. 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schantz, Richard: Wahrheit, Referenz und Realismus. Eine Studie zur Sprachphilosophie und Metaphysik. Berlin/New York 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achinstein, Peter/Barker, Stephen F.: On the New Riddle of Induction. In: Philosophical Review 69 (1960), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter: Goodman’s Problem and Scientific Methodology. In: The Journal of Philosophy 100 (2003), 573–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: Fact, Fiction, and Forecast [1954]. Cambridge, Mass. 41983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: Positionality and Pictures. In: The Philosophical Review 69 (1960),523–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: Problems and Projects. New York 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary: Ramifications of ›Grue‹. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1969), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Rami: Two Interpretations of ›Grue‹ — or How to Misunderstand the New Riddle of Induction. In: Analysis 64 (2004), 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank: Grue. In: The Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975),113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Bredo: Hume, Goodman and Radical Inductive Skepticism. In: Synthese 191 (2014), 2791–2813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, Samir: What Does Goodman’s ›Grue‹ Problem Really Show? In: Philosophical Papers 36 (2007), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: Natural Kinds. In: Ders. (Hg.): Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York 1969, 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinwald, Rosemarie: An Epistemic Solution to Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction. In: Synthese 95 (1993), 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley: On Vindicating Induction. In: Philosophy of Science 30 (1963), 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley: Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. In: Ders./Philipp Kitcher (Hg.): Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13. Minneapolis 1989, 3–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, Alfred: Evidence, Hypothesis, and Grue. In: Synthese 79 (2014),571–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, Douglas (Hg.): Grue!: The New Riddle of Induction. Chicago 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith Jarvis: Grue. In: The Journal of Philosophy 63 (1966), 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Barry: Explanation and the New Riddle of Induction. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 62 (2012), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon/Cooper, Robin: Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 4/2 (1981),159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, David/Clark, Brady: Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, Mass. 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Ariel: Relative Readings of many, often, and Generics. In: Natural Language Semantics 9/1 (2001), 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fintel, Kai von: Bare Plurals, Bare Conditionals and only. In:Journal of Semantics 14/1 (1997), 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fintel, Kai von: Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Amherst, Mass. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herburger, Elena: What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Cambridge, Mass. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In: Jaakko Hintikka/Julius Moravcsik/Patrick Suppes (Hg.): Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht. 1973, 221–242.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mostowski, Andrzej: On a Generalization of Quantifiers. In: Fundamenta Mathematicae 44/1 (1957),12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: Association with Focus. Amherst, Mass. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: A Theory of Focus Interpretation. In: Natural Language Semantics 1/1 (1992),75–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason/Gendler Szabó, Zoltán: On Quantifier Domain Restriction. In: Mind & Language 15/2 (2000), 219– 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: Meaning and Necessity. Chicago 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, Dorothy: On Conditionals. In: Mind 104 (1995), 235–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: Semantic Structure and Logical Form. In: Ders./John McDowell (Hg.): Truth and Meaning. Oxford (1976),199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung. In: Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1 (1918), 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: Gedankengefüge. In: Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 3 (1923), 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence: A Natural History of Negation. Chicago 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, Lloyd: The Connectives. Cambridge, Mass. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnieder, Benjamin: Truthfunctionality. In: Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (2008), 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kindermann, D. et al. (2015). Ausdrücke und ihre Funktion. In: Kompa, N. (eds) Handbuch Sprachphilosophie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05362-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05362-6_4

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-02509-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-05362-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics