Abstract
Some of the suggestions incorporated in the third edition of the Teubner Sophocles I have tried to justify in ICS 1994 (on OC) and others in the Heidelberg symposium Editing Texts, where to the parallels for ἀπακονω̑ν ἔπη I can now add Ach. Tat. 8.9.5, George Pachymeres Or. 2 ad fin., and Eulog. fr. Novat. (M. CIV, 349C). One, on OT 421, I would have mentioned in one way or another if I had thought of it in time, was published in RhM 142 (1999)1. But in the great majority of cases I have not set out my reasons, and even now our allotted time span of 35 minutes imposes restrictions. I have therefore decided to limit myself to Philoctetes, trying not to dwell on the nature of the problems involved where this has been well discussed by others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dawe, R.D. (2003). Notes on the text of Philoctetes. In: Il dramma sofocleo: testo, lingua, interpretazione. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-02909-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-02909-6_7
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Print ISBN: 978-3-476-45303-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-476-02909-6
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)