Skip to main content

Film and Media Studies

  • Chapter
English and American Studies

Abstract

When Marshall McLuhan, the celebrated Canadian media and communication theorist and ‘high guru’ of media culture, first coined the phrase “global village” in 1964, no one could have predicted the level of information-dependency of our planet today. The mechanical age has been left behind and has given way to a postmodern electronic age. We spend an incredible amount of time every day using media, which in itself is a sign of their ubiquity. They represent a huge industry, and are all-powerful for the very reason that they have such a profound effect on us. They shape our ideas, behaviour and what we experience as reality and, due to the computerization of even remote geographic regions of the world, they guarantee that individuals are linked across languages and cultural borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Special cover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • Adelmann, Ralf, et al. “Perspektiven der Fernsehwissenschaft.” Grundlagentexte zur Fernsehwissenschaft: Theo rie– Geschichte– Analyse. Eds. Ralf Adelmann et al. Konstanz: UVK, 2002. 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. Film as Art. 1957. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, Aleida. “Exkarnation. Gedanken zur Grenze zwischen Körper und Schrift.” Raum und Verfahren. Eds. Jörg Huber and Alois Martin Müller. Zurich: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, 1993. 133–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, Irving. The New Laokoon: An Essay on the Confusion of the Arts. London: Constable, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Ulrich. Spectral Evidence: The Photography of Trauma. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balázs, Béla. Schriften zum Film II (1926–1931). Ed. Wolfgang Gersch. Berlin: Henschel, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balázs, Béla. Theory of the Film. Trans. Edith Bone. London: Dennis Dobson, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. “A Small History of Photography.” 1931. One­Way Street and Other Writings. London: Verso, 1985. 225–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” 1936. Illuminations. London: Fontana, 1970. 219–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried, and Helmut Pfotenhauer, eds. Beschreibungskunst– Kunstbeschreibung: Ekphrasis von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Munich: Fink, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, Jay David. “Ekphrasis, Virtual Reality, and the Future of Writing.” The Future of the Book. Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 253–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. 1999. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David. The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, Georg, Peter Gendolla, and Fotis Jannidis, eds. Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie. Paderborn: Mentis, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmell, Deborah, and Imelda Whelehan, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartier, Roger. “Texts, Printing, Readings.” The New Cultural History. Ed. Lynn Hunt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. 154–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delany, Paul, and George P. Landow, eds. Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Teresa. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edel, Leon. “Novel and Camera.” The Theory of the Novel: New Essays. Ed. John Halperin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974. 177–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Steve. Photography: A Very Short History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformation in Early­Modern Europe. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulstich, Werner. Mediengeschichte von 1700 bis ins 3. Jahrtausend. 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Georg. Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Munich: Hanser, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudreault, André, and Philippe Marion. “The Cinema as a Model for the Genealogy of Media.” Convergence 8. 4 (2002): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernsheim, Helmut. Julia Margaret Cameron: Her Life and Photographic Works. Millerton: Aperture Found, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, Michael. Der Buchdruck in der frühen Neuzeit: Eine historische Fallstudie über die Durchsetzung neuer Informations­ und Kommunikationstechnologien. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Barry Keith. Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. London: Wallflower, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, and Karl Ludwig Pfeiffer, eds. Die Materialität der Kommunikation. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. “Encoding/Decoding.” Media Studies: A Reader. 2nd ed. Eds. Paul Marris and Sue Thornham. New York: New York University Press, 2000. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen-Löve, Aage A. “Intermedialität und Intertextualität: Probleme der Korrelation von Wort- und Bildkunst–am Beispiel der russischen Moderne.” Dialog der Texte. Eds. Wolf Schmid and Wolf-Dieter Stempel. Vienna: Gesellschaft zur Förderung slawistischer Studien, 1983. 291–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, Eric A. The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, James A. W. “Ekphrasis and Representation.” New Literary History 22 (1991): 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, James A. W. Museum of Word: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heibach, Christiane. Literatur im elektronischen Raum. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, Jörg, ed. Intermedialität: Theorie und Praxis eines interdisziplinären Forschungsgebietes. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebel, Hans H. “Media: Tabelle zur Geschichte der Medien-Technik.” Medien und Maschinen: Literatur im Technischen Zeitalter. Eds. Theo Elm and Hans H. Hiebel. Freiburg: Rombach, 1991. 186–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Dick. “Intermedia.” Something Else Newsletter 1. 1 (1966): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception,” Dialectic of Enlightenment. Eds. Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno. London: Verso, 1997. 120 – 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, Harold A. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Ludwig. “Die Sprachvergessenheit der Medientheorie: Ein Plädoyer für das Medium Sprache.” Sprache und neue Medien. Ed. Werner Kallmeyer. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Ludwig, Erika Linz, and Irmela Schneider. Preface. Media, Culture, and Mediality: New Insights into the Current State of Research. Eds. Ludwig Jäger, Erika Linz, and Irmela Schneider. Bielefeld: transcript, 2010. 9–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Manfred. “A Guide to Narratological Film Analysis.” Poems, Plays, and Prose: A Guide to the Theory of Literary Genres. English Department, University of Cologne. 2 Aug. 2003. 17 May 2003 http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppf.htm>.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces. New York: Scribner’s, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannidis, Fotis. “Computerphilologie.” Metzler Lexikon Literatur­ und Kulturtheorie. Ed. Ansgar Nünning. 4th ed. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2008. 100–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Sara Gwenllian. “Television.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Eds. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan. London: Routledge, 2005. 585–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, Friedrich. Discourse Networks 1800–1900. Trans. M. Metteer. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klarer, Mario. Ekphrasis: Bildbeschreibung als Repräsentationstheorie bei Spenser, Sidney, Lyly und Shakespeare. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Renate. Gedächtnis und Literatur: Intertextualität in der russischen Moderne. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, George, P. Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas. Film Adaptation and Its Discontents. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leschke, Rainer. Einführung in die Medientheorie. Munich: Fink, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Nicholas Vachel. The Art of the Moving Picture. 1915. New York: Liveright, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. The Reality of the Mass Media (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, Jerome. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of the Typographic Man. London: Routledge, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Media History Project. University of Minnesota. 28 August 2007. 19 May 2011 http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Christian. The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Trans. Celia Brittonet al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, Nicholas. “What Is Visual Culture?” The Visual Culture Reader. Ed. Nicholas Mirzoeff. London: Routledge, 1998. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. Picture Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post­Photographic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostaf, Franziska. Metaphorische Intermedialität: Formen und Funktionen der Verarbeitung von Malerei im Roman: Theorie und Praxis in der englischsprachigen Erzählkunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Trier: WVT, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paech, Joachim, ed. Film, Fernsehen, Video und die Künste: Strategien der Intermedialität. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1994. 163–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech, Joachim. “Intermediale Figuration–am Beispiel von Jean-Luc Godards Histoire(s) du Cinéma.” Mediale Performanzen: Historische Konzepte und Perspektiven. Eds. Jutta Eming et al. Freiburg: Rombach Verlag, 2002. 275–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech, Joachim. “Intermedialität des Films.” Moderne Film Theorie. Ed. Jürgen Felix. Mainz: Bender, 2002. 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech, Joachim, and Jens Schröter, eds. Intermedialität analog/digital. Theorien–Methoden–Analysen. Munich: Fink, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peucker, Brigitte. Incorporating Images: Film and the Rival Arts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pross, Harry. Medienforschung. Darmstadt: Carl Habel, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pross, Harry. Der Mensch im Mediennetz. Zurich: Winkler, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajewsky, Irina O. “Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality.” Intermédialités 6 (2005): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippl, Gabriele. Beschreibungskunst: Zur intermedialen Poetik angloamerikanischer Ikontexte (1880–2000). Munich: Fink, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. Introduction. Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Ed. Marie-Laure Ryan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Media and Narrative.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Eds. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan. London: Routledge, 2005. 288–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. 1916. Trans. Wade Baskin. Eds. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehave. Rev. ed. London: Peter Owen, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Siegfried J. “Medienkulturwissenschaft.” Metzler Lexikon Literatur­ und Kulturtheorie. 4th ed. Ed. Ansgar Nünning. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2008. 472–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönert, Jörg. “Germanistik als Medienwissenschaft oder als radikale Philologie?” Theodor Storm und die Medien. Eds. Gerd Eversberg and Harro Segeberg. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 1999. 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, Jens. “Intermedialität: Facetten und Probleme eines aktuellen medienwissenschaftlichen Begriffs.” Montage/AV 7. 2 (1998): 129–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segeberg, Harro, and Simone Winko, eds. Digitalität und Literalität: Zur Zukunft der Literatur. Munich: Fink, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanowski, Roberto. Interfictions: Vom Schrei ben im Netz. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonis, Annette. Intermediales Spiel im Film: Ästhetische Erfahrung zwischen Schrift, Bild und Musik. Bielefeld: transcript, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Murray. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, Yvonne. Intermedialität: Das System Peter Greenaway. Munich: Fink, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. Film Theory: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. “The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” Introduction. Stam and Raengo 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert, and Alessandra Raengo, eds. Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Malden: Blackwell, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Ed S. H. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kristin, and David Bordwell. Film History: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorow, Almut. “Intermedialität.” Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Ed. Gert Ueding. Vol. 10. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2011. 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. Introduction to Media Studies. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter, ed. Icons–Texts–Iconotexts: Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, Horst. Hören und Sehen–Schrift und Bild: Kultur und Gedächtnis im Mittelalter. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Werner. “Intermediality.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Eds. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan. London: Routledge, 2005. 252–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Werner. The Musicalization of Fiction: A Study in the Theory and History of Intermediality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rippl, G. (2012). Film and Media Studies. In: Middeke, M., Müller, T., Wald, C., Zapf, H. (eds) English and American Studies. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00406-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00406-2_23

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-02306-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-00406-2

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics