Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag untersucht programmatische und polemische Literatur über Rechtsreformen in der gegenwärtigen Diskussion über Unzufriedenheiten mit dem Legalitätskonzept. Er entwickelt eine Klassifikation verschiedener Vorschläge zur Wiederherstellung, Änderung oder Ersetzung heutiger Rechtsinstitutionen. Drei grundsätzlich verschiedene Reaktionen auf die Rechtsordnung werden unterschieden, die legalistische Bestätigung einer selbstgenügsamen autonomen Rechtsordnung; der technokratische Versuch einer effizienteren Sozialkontrolle; und vom Gemeinschaftsdenken inspirierte Versuche, spezialisierte Rechtsformen wieder zurückzuführen in ursprünglichere Vergesellschaftung. Diese Tendenzen werden vor dem Hintergrund neuerer Veränderungen im Charakter und der Reichweite der Rechtsordnung dargestellt. Sie werden als komplexe und widersprüchliche Versuche der Verrechtlichung in manchen, der Entrechtlichung in anderen Bereichen des Soziallebens charakterisiert. Deshalb kann man die gegenwärtigen Tendenzen auch weder als das „Ende des Rechts“ noch als sein volles Aufblühen einschätzen, sondern muß sie vielmehr ansehen als eine Veränderung von Rolle und Verortung rechtlicher Kontrolle ebenso wie unserer Art, diese wahrzunehmen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abel, Richard L. (1973) “Law Books and Books About Law,” 26 Stanford Law Review 1975.
Aubert, Vilhelm (1969) “Law As a Way of Resolving Conflicts: The Case of a Small Industrialized Society,” in L. Nader (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.
Bohannan, Paul (1967) `The Differing Realms of the Law,“ in P. Bohannan (ed.) Law and Warfare. Garden City: Natural History Press.
Brand, George (1971) “The Avoidance of the Traditional Machinery for Adjudication: A World-wide Trend,” 28 Social Research 268.
Burger, Warren (1976) “Agenda for 2000 A.D. — A Need for Systematic Anticipation,” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 83.
Cahn, Edgar S. and Jean Camper Cahn (1970) “Power to the People or the Profession? — The Public Interest in Public Interest Law,” 79 Yale Law Journal 1005.
Campbell, Donald T. (1971) “Legal Reforms as Experiments,” 23 Journal of Legal Education 217.
Danzig, Richard (1973) `Toward the Creation of a Complementary Decentralized System of Criminal Justice,“ 29 Stanford Law Review 1.
Diamond, Stanley (1971) “The Rule of Law Versus the Order of Custom,” 28 Social Research 42.
Dunlop, John (1975) “The Limits of Legal Compulsion,” 25 (Nos. 48–49) John Herling’s Labor Letter.
Edelman, Murray (1967) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Ehrlich, Eugen (1936) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New York: Russell and Russell Publishers.
Evan, William M. (1962) “Public and Private Legal Systems,” in Evan (ed.) Law and Sociology. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Fisher, Eric A. (1975) “Community Courts: An Alternative to Conventional Criminal Adjudication,” 24 American University Law Review 1253.
Fleming, Macklin (1974) The Price of Perfect Justice. New York: Basic Books.
Forer, Lois G. (1975) The Death of the Law. New York: David McKay.
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1969) “On Legal Development,” 24 Rutgers Law Review 11.
Friedman, Lawrence M. and Robert V. Percival (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.
Fuller, Lon (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fuller, Lon (1969) “Two Principles of Human Association,” 11 NOMOS 3 [Voluntary Associations].
Galanter, Marc (1966) “The Modernization of Law,” in M. Weiner (ed.) Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth. New York: Basic Books.
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ”Haves“ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.
Gilmore, Grant (1974) The Death of Contract. Columbos, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
Gilmore, Grant (1975) “The Storrs Lectures: The Age of Anxiety,” 84 Yale Law Journal 1022.
Glazer, Nathan (1975) “Towards an Imperial Judiciary,” 41 The Public Interest 104 (Fall).
Griffiths, John (1970) “Ideology in Criminal Procedure or A Third `Model’ of the Criminal Process,” 79 Yale Law Journal 359.
Haller, Mark H. (1976) “Historical Roots of Police Behavior: Chicage 1890–1925,” 10 Law & Society Review 303.
Halpern, Charles (1976) “The Public Interest Bar: An Audit,” in R. Nader and M. Green (eds.) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Crowell.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hart, Henry M., Jr. (1959) “Foreward: The Time Chart of the Justices,” 73 Harvard Law Review 84.
Johnson, Earl, Jr. (1974) Towards Justice and Reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kadish, Stanford H. (1967) “The Crisis of Overcriminalization,” 374 Annals 157.
Kamenka, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon Tay (1971) `Beyond the French Revolution: Communist Socialism and the Concept of Law,“ 21 University of Toronto Law Journal 109.
Kamenka, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon Tay (1975) “Beyond Bourgeois Individualism: The Contemporary Crisis in Law and Legal Ideology,” in E. Kamenka and R. Neale (eds.) Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond. London: Edward Arnold.
Kennedy, Duncan (1975) The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Unpublished Manuscript on file with the author.
Kennedy, Duncan (1976) “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1685.
Kirp, David L. (1976) “Proceduralism and Bureaucracy: Due Process in the School Setting,” 28 Stanford Law Review 841.
Lazarus, Simon (1974) The Genteel Populists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Lerner, Melvin J. (1976) “Law as a Social Trap,” Culture Learning Institute Report August, 1976.
Lowi, Theodore (1969) The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton Press.
Lowi, Michael J. (1973) “Modernizing the American Legal System: An example of the Peaceful Use of Anthropology,” 32 Human Organization 206.
Lubman, Stanley (1967) “Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China,” 55 California Law Review 1284.
Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.
Mayhew, Leon (1971) “Stability and Change in Legal Systems,” in B. Barber and A. Inkeles (eds.) Stability and Social Change. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Mentschikoff, Soia (1961) “Commercial Arbitration,” 61 Columbia Law Review 846.
Moore, Beverly C., Jr. and Fred R. Harris (1976) “Class Actions’ Let the People In,” in R. Nader and M. Green (eds.) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Crowell.
Moore, Sally Falk (1973) “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Object of Study,” 7 Law & Society Review 719.
Nader, Laura and Linda A. Singer (1976) “Law in the Future: What are the Choices?,” 51 California State Bar Journal 281.
National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice (St. Paul, Minnesota, April 1976), “Addresses,” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 79.
Nisbet, Robert A. (1969) Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonet, Philippe and Philip Selznick (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row.
O’Neil, Robert M. (1970) “Of Justice Delayed and Justice Denied: The Welfare Prior Hearing Cases,” in The Supreme Court Review. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Packer, Herbert (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Parsons, Talcott (1964) “Evolutionary Universals in Society,” 29 American Sociological Review 339.
Pashukanis, E. B. (1951) “The General Theory of Law and Marxism”, in H. Babb (ed.) Soviet Legal Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peltzmann, Sam (1976) “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” 19 Journal of Law and Economics 211.
Pepinsky, Harold E. (1976) “Preventing Crime by Challenging the Rule of Law,” A paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago (1976).
Pospisil, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Quinney, Richard (1974) Critique of Legal Order: Crime Control in Capitalist Society. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Reich, Charles A. (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law Journal 733.
Rifkind, Simon H. (1976) “Are We Asking Too Much of Our Courts?” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 96.
Seidman, Robert (1972) “Law and Development: A General Model,” 6 Law & Society Review 311.
Selznick, Philip (1963) “Legal Institutions and Social Controls,” 17 Vanderbilt Law Review 79.
Selznick, Philip (1969) Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Simon, William H. (1978) “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics”, 1978 Wisconsin Law Review 29.
Tanner, Nancy (1970) “Disputing and the Genesis of Legal Principles: Examples from Minankabau,” 26 Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 375.
Tigar, Michael (1971) “Socialist Law and Legal Institutions,” in R. Lefcourt (ed.) Law Against the People. New York: Vintage Books.
Tilly, Charles (1970) “Clio and Minerva,” In J. McKinney and E. Tiryakian (eds.) Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Development. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Tiruchelvam, Neelan (1973) The Popular Tribunals of Sri Lanka: A Socio-Legal Inquiry. New Haven: Yale Law School Program in Law and Modernization [Working Paper Number 271.
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira (1976) Law in Modern Society: Towards a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: The Free Press.
Wasby, Stephen L. (1970) The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.
Weber, Max (1954 ed.) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. (M. Rheinstein, ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wechsler, Herbert (1959) “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law,” 73 Harvard Law Review 1.
Woodard, Calvin (1972) “The Limits of Legal Realism: An Historical Perspective,” 54 Virginia Law Review (4) 689.
Zimring, Franklin E. and Gordon J. Hawkins (1973) Deterrence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galanter, M. (1980). Legality and its Discontents: A Preliminary Assessment of Current Theories of Legalization and Delegalization. In: Blankenburg, E., Klausa, E., Rottleuthner, H. (eds) Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht. Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, vol 6. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96990-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96990-3_1
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11504-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-96990-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive