Skip to main content

Legality and its Discontents: A Preliminary Assessment of Current Theories of Legalization and Delegalization

  • Chapter
Book cover Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht

Part of the book series: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie ((JRR,volume 6))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag untersucht programmatische und polemische Literatur über Rechtsreformen in der gegenwärtigen Diskussion über Unzufriedenheiten mit dem Legalitätskonzept. Er entwickelt eine Klassifikation verschiedener Vorschläge zur Wiederherstellung, Änderung oder Ersetzung heutiger Rechtsinstitutionen. Drei grundsätzlich verschiedene Reaktionen auf die Rechtsordnung werden unterschieden, die legalistische Bestätigung einer selbstgenügsamen autonomen Rechtsordnung; der technokratische Versuch einer effizienteren Sozialkontrolle; und vom Gemeinschaftsdenken inspirierte Versuche, spezialisierte Rechtsformen wieder zurückzuführen in ursprünglichere Vergesellschaftung. Diese Tendenzen werden vor dem Hintergrund neuerer Veränderungen im Charakter und der Reichweite der Rechtsordnung dargestellt. Sie werden als komplexe und widersprüchliche Versuche der Verrechtlichung in manchen, der Entrechtlichung in anderen Bereichen des Soziallebens charakterisiert. Deshalb kann man die gegenwärtigen Tendenzen auch weder als das „Ende des Rechts“ noch als sein volles Aufblühen einschätzen, sondern muß sie vielmehr ansehen als eine Veränderung von Rolle und Verortung rechtlicher Kontrolle ebenso wie unserer Art, diese wahrzunehmen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abel, Richard L. (1973) “Law Books and Books About Law,” 26 Stanford Law Review 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, Vilhelm (1969) “Law As a Way of Resolving Conflicts: The Case of a Small Industrialized Society,” in L. Nader (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, Paul (1967) `The Differing Realms of the Law,“ in P. Bohannan (ed.) Law and Warfare. Garden City: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, George (1971) “The Avoidance of the Traditional Machinery for Adjudication: A World-wide Trend,” 28 Social Research 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, Warren (1976) “Agenda for 2000 A.D. — A Need for Systematic Anticipation,” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, Edgar S. and Jean Camper Cahn (1970) “Power to the People or the Profession? — The Public Interest in Public Interest Law,” 79 Yale Law Journal 1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. (1971) “Legal Reforms as Experiments,” 23 Journal of Legal Education 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzig, Richard (1973) `Toward the Creation of a Complementary Decentralized System of Criminal Justice,“ 29 Stanford Law Review 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Stanley (1971) “The Rule of Law Versus the Order of Custom,” 28 Social Research 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John (1975) “The Limits of Legal Compulsion,” 25 (Nos. 48–49) John Herling’s Labor Letter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray (1967) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, Eugen (1936) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New York: Russell and Russell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, William M. (1962) “Public and Private Legal Systems,” in Evan (ed.) Law and Sociology. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Eric A. (1975) “Community Courts: An Alternative to Conventional Criminal Adjudication,” 24 American University Law Review 1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Macklin (1974) The Price of Perfect Justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forer, Lois G. (1975) The Death of the Law. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. (1969) “On Legal Development,” 24 Rutgers Law Review 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. and Robert V. Percival (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon (1969) “Two Principles of Human Association,” 11 NOMOS 3 [Voluntary Associations].

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc (1966) “The Modernization of Law,” in M. Weiner (ed.) Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ”Haves“ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Grant (1974) The Death of Contract. Columbos, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Grant (1975) “The Storrs Lectures: The Age of Anxiety,” 84 Yale Law Journal 1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Nathan (1975) “Towards an Imperial Judiciary,” 41 The Public Interest 104 (Fall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, John (1970) “Ideology in Criminal Procedure or A Third `Model’ of the Criminal Process,” 79 Yale Law Journal 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Mark H. (1976) “Historical Roots of Police Behavior: Chicage 1890–1925,” 10 Law & Society Review 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, Charles (1976) “The Public Interest Bar: An Audit,” in R. Nader and M. Green (eds.) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Henry M., Jr. (1959) “Foreward: The Time Chart of the Justices,” 73 Harvard Law Review 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Earl, Jr. (1974) Towards Justice and Reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadish, Stanford H. (1967) “The Crisis of Overcriminalization,” 374 Annals 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenka, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon Tay (1971) `Beyond the French Revolution: Communist Socialism and the Concept of Law,“ 21 University of Toronto Law Journal 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenka, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon Tay (1975) “Beyond Bourgeois Individualism: The Contemporary Crisis in Law and Legal Ideology,” in E. Kamenka and R. Neale (eds.) Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Duncan (1975) The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Unpublished Manuscript on file with the author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Duncan (1976) “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, David L. (1976) “Proceduralism and Bureaucracy: Due Process in the School Setting,” 28 Stanford Law Review 841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, Simon (1974) The Genteel Populists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Melvin J. (1976) “Law as a Social Trap,” Culture Learning Institute Report August, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore (1969) The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Michael J. (1973) “Modernizing the American Legal System: An example of the Peaceful Use of Anthropology,” 32 Human Organization 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubman, Stanley (1967) “Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China,” 55 California Law Review 1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, Leon (1971) “Stability and Change in Legal Systems,” in B. Barber and A. Inkeles (eds.) Stability and Social Change. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentschikoff, Soia (1961) “Commercial Arbitration,” 61 Columbia Law Review 846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Beverly C., Jr. and Fred R. Harris (1976) “Class Actions’ Let the People In,” in R. Nader and M. Green (eds.) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Sally Falk (1973) “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Object of Study,” 7 Law & Society Review 719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nader, Laura and Linda A. Singer (1976) “Law in the Future: What are the Choices?,” 51 California State Bar Journal 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice (St. Paul, Minnesota, April 1976), “Addresses,” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert A. (1969) Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonet, Philippe and Philip Selznick (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, Robert M. (1970) “Of Justice Delayed and Justice Denied: The Welfare Prior Hearing Cases,” in The Supreme Court Review. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, Herbert (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1964) “Evolutionary Universals in Society,” 29 American Sociological Review 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashukanis, E. B. (1951) “The General Theory of Law and Marxism”, in H. Babb (ed.) Soviet Legal Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzmann, Sam (1976) “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” 19 Journal of Law and Economics 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, Harold E. (1976) “Preventing Crime by Challenging the Rule of Law,” A paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pospisil, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, Richard (1974) Critique of Legal Order: Crime Control in Capitalist Society. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Charles A. (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law Journal 733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkind, Simon H. (1976) “Are We Asking Too Much of Our Courts?” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, Robert (1972) “Law and Development: A General Model,” 6 Law & Society Review 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1963) “Legal Institutions and Social Controls,” 17 Vanderbilt Law Review 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1969) Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, William H. (1978) “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics”, 1978 Wisconsin Law Review 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, Nancy (1970) “Disputing and the Genesis of Legal Principles: Examples from Minankabau,” 26 Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigar, Michael (1971) “Socialist Law and Legal Institutions,” in R. Lefcourt (ed.) Law Against the People. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles (1970) “Clio and Minerva,” In J. McKinney and E. Tiryakian (eds.) Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Development. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiruchelvam, Neelan (1973) The Popular Tribunals of Sri Lanka: A Socio-Legal Inquiry. New Haven: Yale Law School Program in Law and Modernization [Working Paper Number 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Roberto Mangabeira (1976) Law in Modern Society: Towards a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasby, Stephen L. (1970) The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1954 ed.) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. (M. Rheinstein, ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, Herbert (1959) “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law,” 73 Harvard Law Review 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, Calvin (1972) “The Limits of Legal Realism: An Historical Perspective,” 54 Virginia Law Review (4) 689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, Franklin E. and Gordon J. Hawkins (1973) Deterrence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Erhard Blankenburg Ekkehard Klausa Hubert Rottleuthner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Galanter, M. (1980). Legality and its Discontents: A Preliminary Assessment of Current Theories of Legalization and Delegalization. In: Blankenburg, E., Klausa, E., Rottleuthner, H. (eds) Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht. Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, vol 6. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96990-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96990-3_1

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11504-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-96990-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics