Media Psychology in Sweden and the Nordic Countries

  • Olle Findahl


Looking around in Sweden and the Nordic countries it is hard to find any place where you could study media psychology. It is even hard to find any media psychologists. The reason is very simple. Academic psychology at the nordic universities has not been interested in media. They think that a media text is too complex and too complicated to study. So we will not find media psychology in a department of Psychology in the nordic countries.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bower, G. H., Black. J, B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carragee, K. (1990). Interpretative media study and interpretative social science. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7:2, 81–96.Google Scholar
  3. Cook. T., & Campell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  4. Corner, J., Richardson, R., & Fenton, N. (1990). Nuclear reactions. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  5. Curran, J. (1990). The new revisionism in mass communication research: A reappraisal. European Journal of Communication, 5, 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. vanDijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Findahl, O., & Höijer, B. ( 1976. Reality as fragment. An experiment with news and TV-visuals. Stockholm: Sveriges Radios Publik-och Programforskningsavdelning.Google Scholar
  8. Findahl, O., & Höijer, B. (1984). Begriplighetsanalys. En forskningsgenomgdng och en tillämpning pd nyhetsinslag i radio och TV. (Comprehension analysis. A review of the research and an application to radio och TV news). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  9. Findahl, O. (1988). Televisionens möjligheter och begränsningar - som informations-och kunskapsförmedlare. ( The Possibilities and Limits of Television - as a source of information and knowledge.) Stockholm: Sveriges Radios Publik-och Programforskningsavdelning.Google Scholar
  10. Findahl, 0 (1989). Aids - en utmaning for informationssamhället. Om att informera om aids via television. (Aids as a challenge to the information society). Stockholm: Sveriges Radios Publik-och Programforskningsavdelning.Google Scholar
  11. Findahl, O. (1993). The news in our minds. The effects of the news on our conceptions of the world around us. The department of Media and Communication, Ume$ University.Google Scholar
  12. Graber, D., A. (1984). Processing the news. How people tame the information tide. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Höijer,B., & Findahl, O. (1984). Nyheter, förstdelse, minne.(News, Comprehension, Memory). Lund. Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  14. Höijer, B. (1986). The In-Depth Interview as a Method for Studying the Receptions of Programs. Sveriges Radio/PUB.Google Scholar
  15. Höijer, B. (1989). Television-evoked thoughts and their relation to comprehension. Communication Research, 16:2, 179–203.Google Scholar
  16. Höijer, B. (1990). Vetenskap i tv. En kvalitativ närstudie av hur tittare tolkar och upplever ett medicinskt program. ( Science in Television ). Sveriges Radio/PUB.Google Scholar
  17. Höijer, B. (1992). Reception of television narration as a socio-cognitive process: A schema-theoretical outline. Poetics, 21, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Larsen, S. F. (1983). Text processing and knowledge updating in memory for radio news. Discourse Processes, 6, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larsen, S. F. (1988). Remembering without experience: Memory for reported events. In U Neisser & E Winograd (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory ( 326–355 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsen, S. F. (1991). Potential flashbulbs: Memories of ordinary news as the baseline. In E Winograd & U Neisser (Eds.), Affects and accuracy in recall: The problem of “flashbulb” memories. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Livingstone, S. (1990). Making sense of television. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  23. Nass, C. I., & Reeves, B. (1991). Combining, distinguishing and generating theories in communication. Communication Research, 18:2, 240–261.Google Scholar
  24. Nowak, K. (1980). Mikro-makro, cur och recur. Om teorier for Idngsiktiga effekter av masskommunikation. MASS 2. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olle Findahl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations