Skip to main content

A Critique of Lenz’s Art of Scenic Variation

  • Chapter
Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz
  • 168 Accesses

Abstract

That Lenz’s theatre exerted a seminal influence, is established beyond question in the documentation of its reception in literature, drama and music, recent illustrations of which are discussed by Peter Petersen and Hans-Gerd Winter in their article for the first volume of the new Lenz-Jahrbuch.1 That his theatre was distinctive, contributed in no small measure to its seminal influence. Some of its features are more distinctive than others, one of them, it is claimed, his art of scenic variation, an organic part of the characteristic cluster identified by Inbar as the “Prinzip der Handlungsstränge, Variation, Episodik”.2 The task of this paper is to establish how far a critical assessment of Lenz’s contribution to the art of scenic variation can support such a claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter Petersen and Hans-Gerd Winter, “Das Musiktheater als Sonderzweig der produktiven Rezeption von J. M. R. Lenz’ Dramen und Dramentheorie,” Lenz Jahrbuch, 1 (1991), 9–58; see also Hans-Gerd Winter, J. M. R. Lenz, Sammlung Metzler, 233 (Stuttgart, 1987 ), pp. 112–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eva Maria Inbar, Shakespeare in Deutschland: Der Fall Lenz,Studien zur deutschen Literatur, 67 (Tübingen, 1982), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gotthold Ephraim Lessing: Sämtliche Werke,ed. Karl Lachmann and Franz Muncker, 15 vols (rpt. Berlin, 1979), IX, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Rhetoric, Poetic, and the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle,trans. Thomas Taylor, 2 vols (London, 1818), I, 297–98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Werke,5 parts in 4 vols (Kopenhagen, 1771 ff.). Vergleichung Shakespears und Andreas Gryphs bey Gelegenheit einer Uebersetzung von Shakespears Julius Cäsar,Part 3, pp. 29–64, here p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Max Halbe, “Der Dramatiker Reinhold Lenz. Zu seinem hundertjährigen Geburtstage,” Die Gesellschaft, 8 (1892), 568–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Friedrich Voit, J. M. R. Lenz, Der Hofmeister,Erläuterungen und Dokumente (Stuttgart, 1986), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Batley, E. (1994). A Critique of Lenz’s Art of Scenic Variation. In: Hill, D. (eds) Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94235-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94235-7_14

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-94235-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics