Skip to main content

Responsible Party Government — What Has Changed ?

  • Chapter
Großbritannien

Abstract

The doctrine of responsible party government, as it has developed in Britain, is characteristic of much of British constitutional theory. It is derived from experience, not deduced from first principles. It turns what is seen to be functional into a norm The doctrine is consequently a guide to action, not an expression of permanently valid wisdom. It was a peculiar invention, determined by a peculiar conjunction of time and place and it has worked reasonably well in a few places for limited periods. We should therefore not be surprised that attempts to transplant it to other soils have not, on the whole, been successful, nor that the doct rine itself is contested at home, especially in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.-J. Rousseau, The Social Contract, transi G. Hopkins, Oxford 1947, Book III, ch. XIV, p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. McIver, The Web of Government, New York 1947, p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sir S. Low, The Governance of England, London 21913, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Hume, Of Parties in General, Essays Moral, Political and Literary, London 1903, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London 1943, p. 274, note 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Macpherson, A Short History of the Opposition during the Last Session of Parliament, London 1779, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Opposition, The Quarterly Review, October 1822, p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Ranby, An Inquiry Into the Supposed Increase of the Influence of the Crown, London 1811, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.E. Gladstone, The Declining Efficiency of Parliament, The Quarterly Review, June 1856, pp. 528, 533–534.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 526

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Bagehot, The English Constitution, with an introduction by the Earl of Balfour, KG, OM, Oxford 1928, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted by H. Laski, Parliamentary Government in England, London 1938, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Bagehot, op. cit., pp. 22, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted by A. Lawrence Lowell, The Government of England, New York 1926, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lord Simon, quoted by L.S. Amery, Thoughts on the Constitution, Oxford 1947, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See A. J. Beattie, The Two-Party System: Room for Sceptlm? in S.E. Finer (ed.), Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform, London 1975, pp. 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lowell, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 515.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., Vol. II, p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., Vol. I, p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sir G. Edwards, The Emergence of Majority Rule in British Parliamentary Elections, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 1964, p. 185

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.J. Hanham, Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone, London 1959, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Hare, Treatise on the Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal, London 1859

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Stuart Mill, Considerations on Representative Government, London 1861. See V. Bogdanor, The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics, Cambridge 1981, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Bagehot, op. cit., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Jones, The Politics of Reform 1884, Cambridge 1972, pp. 179–198, 211–212

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bogdanor, op. cit., pp. 114–115.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.R. MacDonald, Socialism and Government, London 1909, Vol. II, pp. 15–18; Bogdanor, op. cit., p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. J. Laski, op. cit., pp. 55, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.A. Schumpeter, op. cit., p. 293;

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. Döring, Schumpeter’s Britain–Forty Years on, in: West European Politics, January 1983, pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E.g. N. Johnson, In Search of the Constitution: Reflections on State and Society in Britain, Oxford 1977, pp. 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. H. Beer, Modern British Politics: A Study of Parties and Pressure Groups London 21969, pp. 395, 406.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., pp. 318, 407;

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. H. Beer, Britain Against Itself: The Political Contradictions of Collectivism, London 1982, pp. 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  38. I. Crewe, The Electorate: Partisan Dealignment Ten Years On, in: West European Politics, October 1983, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Britain Will Win With Labour, in: The Times Guide to the House of Commons, October 1974, London 1974, p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Särlvik and I. Crewe, Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s, Cambridge 1983, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. J. Lijpphart, Consociational Democracy, in: World Politics 1969, pp. 207229.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cit. A. King, The Election That Everyone Lost, in: H.R. Penniman (ed.) Britain At the Polls: The Parliamentary Elections of 1974, Washington DC 1975, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Let Us Work Together, in: The Times Guide to the House of Commons 1974, London 1974, p. 311; The New Hope for Britain, in: The Times Guide to the House of Commons 1983, London 1983, p. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Conservative Manifesto 1979, in: The Times Guide to the House of Commons 1979, London 1979,p. 282.

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Crewe, West European Politics, October 1983, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  47. I. Crewe, op. cit., pp. 202–203.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Market and Opinion Research International, British Public Opinion: General Election 1983, London 1983, pp. 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  49. The Observer, 29 April 1984, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  50. R.T. McKenzie, British Political Parties: The Distribution of Power Within the Conservative and Labour Parties, London 21963, pp. 386–484.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Ostrogorski, Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, edited and abridged by S. M. Lipset, Chicago 1964, Vol. I, pp. 227, 229, 304.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Interview in The Observer, 25 February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  53. I. Crewe, op. cit., pp. 194–196; The Economist, 18 June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  54. J. Curtice and M. Steed, Electoral Choice and the Production of Government. The Changing Operation of the Electoral System in the UK since 1955, in: British Journal of Political Science, July 1982, pp. 249–298.

    Google Scholar 

  55. D. Butler and D. Kavanagh, The British General Election of 1983, London 1984, pp. 236–237.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. Douglas, The Conservative Party: From Pragmatism to Ideology - and Back?, in: West European Politics, October 1983, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Herbert Döring Dieter Grosser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pulzer, P. (1987). Responsible Party Government — What Has Changed ?. In: Döring, H., Grosser, D. (eds) Großbritannien. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93771-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93771-1_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-0550-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-93771-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics