Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interactive/Activation in Normal and Brain-damaged Individuals: Can Context Penetrate the Lexical ‘Module’?

  • Chapter
Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte ((LINGB))

Abstract

Anomia is defined as a pathological deficit in finding and producing words. It is the one symptom that appears in every form of aphasia. It is also an early and ubiquitous symptom in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type, and milder forms of anomia are among the most common complaints in normal aging. Classically, anomia has been explained as a disconnection or deterioration in the links between semantic and lexical representations (i.e. between meaning and phonological/orthographic forms — (Farah & Wallace 1992; Gainotti, Silveri, Villa & Miceli 1986; Hadar, Jones & Mate-Kole 1987; le Dorze & Nespoulous 1989; Lucchelli & de Renzi 1992). In fact, some studies have found that training can greatly improve the performance of anomic aphasics, (Colby, Chrisinaz, Parkinson, Graham & Karpf 1981) a clear indication that semantic repre­sentations themselves have not been damaged in anomia. Since the residual language deficit in anomic patients seems to revolve around lexical access (i.e. naming), it would be useful to know whether these patients show normal forms of facilitation and/or inhibition in real-time lexical processing. The same is true for the milder word-finding deficits that are often found in normal aging. Is this deficit restricted entirely to word production, or can we find correlates and (perhaps) a possible cause in other aspects of lexical access? And if so, what is the nature of the disturbance in lexical access that underlies this common disorder?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balota, D.A. & R.F. Lorch (1986): “Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 12, 336–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., B. Wulfeck & B. MacWhinney B. (1991): “Cross-linguistic studies in aphasia: An overview. Special Issue: Crosslinguistic studies of aphasia”. Brain & Language 41, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C., K.L. Church & W.J. Hoyer (1985): “Automatic and controlled semantic priming: Accuracy, response bias, and aging”. Journal of Gerontology 40, 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., B. MacWhinney, M. Flatt & J. Provost (1993): “PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macin­tosh computers”. Behavioral Research Methods 25, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, K.M., D. Chrisinaz, R.C. Parkinson, S. Graham & C. Karpf (1981): “A word-finding computer program with a dynamic lexical-semantic memory for patients with anomia using an intelligent speech prosthesis”. Brain & Language 14, 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, L. (1986): “Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 12, 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M.J. & M.A. Wallace (1992): “Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming”. Neuropsychologia 30, 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983): The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K.I. (1981): “Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 33A, 465–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D.J. (1982): “A discourse on semantic priming”. Cognitive Psychology 14, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A.D. & L. Frazier (1992): “Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands”. Brain & Language 42, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A.D. & K. Kilborn (1989): “Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasia”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1, 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti, G., M.C. Silveri, G. Villa & G. Miceli (1986): “Anomia with and without lexical corn-prehension disorders. First European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology” (1983, Bressanone, Italy). Brain & Language 29, 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J. (1990): “Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming”. Journal of Memory & Language 29, 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, U., C. Jones & C. Mate-Kole (1987): “The disconnection in anomic aphasia between semantic and phonological lexicons”. Cortex 23, 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P. (1993): “Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities”. Brain & Language 45, 189–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., E.R. Stoltzfus, R.T. Zacks & B. Rypma (1991): “Age and inhibition”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 17, 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L. & R. Zacks (1988): “Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view”. In: G.H. Bower, eds., The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 22). San Diego: Academic Press, 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, H.H. & M.M. Van Grunsven (1985): “Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon”. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2, 347–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • le Dorze, G. & J.-L. Nespoulous (1989): “Anomia in moderate aphasia: Problems in accessing the lexical representation”. Brain & Language 37, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, L.L. & D.M. Burke (1988): “Patterns of language and memory in old age”. In: L.L. Light & D.M. Burke, eds., Language, memory and aging. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchelli, F. & E. de Renzi (1992): “Proper name anomia”. Cortex 28, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangolo, P., E. Dipace & L. Pizzamiglio (1993): “Priming Effect In A Color Discrimination Task”. Perceptual And Motor Skills 77, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & L.T. Tyler (1987): “Against Modularity”. In: J.L. Garfield, eds., Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding. Cam­bridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. & D.E. Rumelhart (1981): “An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings”. Psychological Review 88, 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millberg, W., S.E. Blumstein, D. Katz & F. Gershberg (1992): Semantic facilitation in aphasia: Effects of time and expectancy. Unpublished Manuscript, Boston University School of Medicine, Aphasia Research Center, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrushina, M. & P. Satz (1991): “Effect of repeated administration of a neuropsychological battery in the elderly”. Journal of Clinical Psychology 47, 790–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebes, R.D., F. Boller & A. Holland (1986): “Use of Semantic Context by Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease”. Psychology and Aging 1, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebes, R.D. & C.B. Brady (1992): “Generalized cognitive slowing and severity of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for the interpretation of response-time data”. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 14, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J.H. (1976): “Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes”. Memory & Cognition 4, 648–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober, B.A., G.K. Shenaut, W.J. Jagust & R.C. Stillman (1991): “Automatic semantic priming with various category relations in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging”. Psychology & Aging 6, 647–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onifer, W. & D.A. Swinney (1981): “Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias”. Memory & Cognition 9, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrin, R.K. & L.K. Tyler (1993): “Automatic access to lexical semantics in aphasia: Evidence from semantic and associative priming”. Brain & Language 45, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M.C. & C. Snyder (1975): “Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals”. In: P. Rabbitt & S. Dornic, eds., Attention and Performance. (Vol. V). New York: Academic Press, 669–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T.A. (1991): “Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing”. Psychological Science 2, 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S., M.K. Tanenhaus, J.M. Leiman & M. Bienkowski (1982): “Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based process­ing”. Cognitive Psychology 14, 489–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweedy, J.R., R.H. Lapinski & R.W. Schvaneveldt (1977): “Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate con­text”. Memory & Cognition 5, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C. & M. Kutas (1987): “Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation”. Journal of Memory & Language 26, 188–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E., D. Swinney, P. Prather, A. Wingfield & H. Brownell (1992): An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in the elderly. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis Univesity, Department of Psychology and Center for Complex Systems, Waltham, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Diego, USA

    Arturo Hernandez & Elizabeth Bates

Authors
  1. Arturo Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Bates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Science and Technology, Centre for Computational Linguistics, University of Manchester, P.O. Box 88, M60 1QD, Manchester, UK

    Dieter Hillert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hernandez, A., Bates, E. (1994). Interactive/Activation in Normal and Brain-damaged Individuals: Can Context Penetrate the Lexical ‘Module’?. In: Hillert, D. (eds) Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience. Linguistische Berichte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91649-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91649-5_9

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-91649-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation