Advertisement

The “Country-of-origin Effect” in Multinational Corporations: Sources, Mechanisms and Moderating Conditions

  • Niels G. Noorderhaven
  • Anne-Wil Harzing
Part of the Journal of International Business book series (MIR, volume 2)

Abstract

This conceptual paper examines the role of country-of-origin effects in MNCs. It deals with definitional problems and discusses both the sources of the country-of-origin effect, and the mechanisms through which it manifests itself.

The strength of the country-of-origin effect is hypothesized to be moderated by factors related to both the home country and the MNC.

Keywords

Power Distance Multinational Corporation Uncertainty Avoidance Task Environment Parent Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartlett, C. A./Ghoshal, S., Managing Across Borders, The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press 1989.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J./McNaughton, R./Young, S., ‘Born-again Global’ Firms. An Exension to the ‘Born Global’ Phenomenon, Journal of International Management, 1, 2001, pp. 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bomers, G. B. J./Peterson, R. B., Multinational Corporations and Industrial Relations: The Case of West Germany and the Netherlands, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 15, March 1977, pp. 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley, P. J./Casson, M., The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan 1985.Google Scholar
  5. Busenitz, L. W./Gomez, C./Spencer, J. W., Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 2000, pp. 994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calori, R./Lubatkin, M./Very, P./Veiga, J. F., Modelling the Origins of Nationally-Bound Administrative Heritages: A Historical Institutional Analysis of French and British Firms, Organization Science, 8, 1997, pp. 681–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dicken, P., Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy, London: Paul Chapman 1998.Google Scholar
  8. DiMaggio, P. J./Powell, W. W., Introduction, in Powell, W. W./DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1991, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  9. Dowling, P./Welch, D. E./Schuler, R., International Human Resource Management: Managing People in a Multinational Context, Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Ferner, A., Country of Origin Effects and Human Resource Management in Multinational Companies’, Human Resource Management Journal, 7, 1997, pp. 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghoshal, S./Nohria, N., Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 1989, pp. 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giddens, A., Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives, London: Profile Books 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Harzing, A.-W. K., Managing the Multinationals: An International Study of Control Mechanisms, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Harzing, A.-W. K., Acquisitions versus Greenfield Investments: International Strategy and Management of Entry Modes, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 2002, pp. 211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harzing, A.-W. K./Sorge, A. M./Paauwe, J., HQ-subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Companies: A British-German Comparison, in Geppert, M./Matten, D./Williams, K. (eds.), Challenges for European Management in a Global Context — Experiences from Britain and Germany, Basingstoke, London, New York: Palgrave 2002, pp. 96–118.Google Scholar
  16. Harzing, A.-W. K./Sorge, A. M., The Relative Impact of Country-of-origin and Universal Contingencies on Internationalization Strategies and Corporate Control in Multinational Enterprises: World-wide and European Perspectives, Organization Studies, 24, 2003, pp. 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayden, A./Edwards, T., The Erosion of the Country of Origin Effect; A Case Study of a Swedish Multinational Company, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 56, 2001, pp. 116–140.Google Scholar
  18. Hofstede, G., Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, London: Sage Publications 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G., Culture’s Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, second edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Hu, Y.-S., Global or Stateless Corporations are National Firms with International Operations, California Management Review, Winter 1992, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  21. Jain, H. C./Lawler, J. J./Morishima, M., Multinational Corporations, Human Resource Management and Host-country Nationals, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 1998, pp. 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, G., Rethinking Incrementalism, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 1988, pp. 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kostova, T., Country institutional profile: Concept and Measurement, Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 1997, 180–184.Google Scholar
  24. Kostova, T., Transnational Transfer of Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 24, 1999, pp. 308–324.Google Scholar
  25. Kostova, T./Roth, K., Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2002, pp. 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindholm, N., National Culture and Performance Management in MNC Subsidiaries, International Studies of Management & Organization, 29, 1999–2000, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  27. Lubatkin, M./Calori, R./Very, P./Veiga, J. F., Managing Mergers Across Borders: A Two-Nation Exploration of a Nationally Bound Administrative Heritage, Organization Science, 9, 1998, pp. 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinez, J. I./Jarillo, J. C., Coordination Demands of International Strategies, Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 1991, pp. 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maurice, M., For a Study of “the Societal Effect”: Universality and Specificity in Organization Research, in Lammers, C. J./Hickson, D. J. (eds.), Organizations Alike and Unlike, London: Rout-ledge 1979, pp. 42–60.Google Scholar
  30. Maurice, M./Sorge, A./Warner, M., Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units. A Comparison of France, Great Britain and West Germany, Organization Studies, 1, 1980, pp. 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mueller, F., Societal Effect, Organizational Effect and Globalization, Organization Studies, 15, 1994, pp. 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ngo, H.-Y./Turban, D./Lau, C.-M./Lui, S.-Y., Human Resource Practices and Firm Performance of Multinational Corporations: Influences of Country Origin, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 1998, pp. 632–652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nobel, R./Birkinshaw, J., Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Patterns in International R&D Operations, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 1998, pp. 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nohria, N./Ghoshal, S., The Differentiated Network, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Nonaka, I., A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 5, 1994, pp. 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Offermann, L. R./Hellmann, P. S., Culture’s Consequences for Leadership Behavior: National Values in Action, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 1997, pp. 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohmae, K., The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy, London: Collins 1990.Google Scholar
  38. Pauly, L. W./Reich, S., National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behavior: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalization, International Organization, 51, 1997, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peters, T. J./Waterman, R. H., Jr., In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, New York: Harper & Row 1982.Google Scholar
  40. Pfeffer, J./Salancik, G. R., The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row 1978.Google Scholar
  41. Ruigrok, W./Van Tulder, R., The logic of International Restructuring, London: Routledge 1995.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, R., Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1995.Google Scholar
  43. Sethi, S. P./Elango, B., The Influence of „Country of Origin” on Multinational Corporation Global Strategy: A Conceptual Framework, Journal of International Management, 5,1999, pp. 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sölvell, O./Zander, I., Organization of the Dynamic Multinational Enterprise: The Home-based and the Heterarchical MNE, International Studies of Management & Organization, 25, (1–2), 1995, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
  45. Sorge, A., Cross-national Differences in Personnel and Organization: Describing and Explaining Variables, in Harzing, A. W. K./Van Ruysseveldt, J., International Human Resource Management, London: Sage 1995, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
  46. Sorge, A./Warner, M., Comparative Factory Organisation. An Anglo German Comparison of Management and Manpower in Manufacturing, Aldershot: Gower 1986.Google Scholar
  47. Tregaskis, O., HRD in Foreign MNEs Assessing the Impact of Parent Origin Versus Host Country, Context, International Studies of Management and Organization, 28, 1, 1998, pp. 136–163.Google Scholar
  48. Whitley, R., (ed)., European Business Systems; Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, London: Sage 1992a.Google Scholar
  49. Whitley, R., Societies, Firms and Markets: The Social Structuring of Business Systems, in Whitley, R., (ed.), European Business Systems; Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, London: Sage 1992b, pp. 5–45.Google Scholar
  50. Whitley, R., The Social Construction of Economic Actors: Institutions and Types of Firm in Europe and Other Market Economies, in Whitley, R./Kristensen, P. H. (eds.), The Changing European Firm; Limits to Convergence, London: Routledge 1996, pp. 39–66.Google Scholar
  51. Whitley, R., Competing Logics and Units of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Economic Organization, International Studies of Management & Organization, 29, 2, 1999, pp. 113–126.Google Scholar
  52. Whitley, R./Kristensen, P. H., (eds.), The Changing European Firm; Limits to Convergence, London: Routledge 1996.Google Scholar
  53. Wong, G. Y. Y./Birnbaum-More, P. H., Culture, Context and Structure: A Test on Hong Kong Banks, Organization Studies, 15, 1994, pp. 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu, D./Shenkar, O., Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 27, 2002, pp. 608–618.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels G. Noorderhaven
    • 1
  • Anne-Wil Harzing
    • 2
  1. 1.Tilburg UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations