Skip to main content

Open Source ft Co.: Innovative User-Netzwerke

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass eine einzelne Person alle mit dem Innovationsprozess verbundenen Teilaufgaben gleichermaßen gut lösen kann, ist gering. Der einsame Innovator ist ein griffiges und von den Medien geliebtes Bild, stellt aber wohl eher einen Mythos dar. Fast immer sind Innovationen arbeitsteilige Mehrpersonenleistungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Allen, R. (1983): Collective Invention, Journal of Economic Behavior und Organization, 4(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.J., M.L. Tushman und D.M.S Lee (1979): Technology Transfer as a Function of Position in the Spectrum from Research through Development to Technical Services, The Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 694–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartl, M., H. Ernst und J. Füller (2004): Community Based Innovation — eine Methode zur Einbindung von Online Communities in den Innovationsprozess, in: Herstatt, C. und J. Sander (Hrsg.): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities, Wiesbaden, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, M. und J. Ljungberg (2001): The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities, Information Systems Journal, 11(4), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (1999): Forschung und Entwicklung. Planung und Kontrolle, 5. Aufl., München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. und P. Duguid (1991): Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice, Organization Science, 1(2), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brügge, B., D. Harhoff, A. Picot, O. Creighton, M. Fiedler und J. Henkel (2004): Open Source Software. Eine ökonomische und technische Analyse, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P., F. Creplet und O. Dupouet (2001): Organizational Innovation, Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: The Case of Linux, in: Kirman, A. und J.B. Zimmermann (Hrsg.): Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. und N. Jonard (2003): The Dynamics of Collective Invention, Journal of Economic Behavior und Organization, 52(4), 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cziksentmihalyi, M. (1996): Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, P.P. (1974): Social Exchange Theory: the Two Traditions, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., J.H. Soll und M. Spann (2004): Möglichkeiten der Lead-User-Identifikation in Online Medien, in: Herstatt, C. und J. Sander (Hrsg.): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities, Wiesbaden, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, E. und C. Jungwirth (2003): Reconciling Rent-Seekers and Donators — The Governance Structure of Open Source, Journal of Management and Governance, 7(4), 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N. und S. Shah (2003): How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users, Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N. und E. von Hippel (2003): Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software, Research Policy, 32(7), 1199–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., J. Henkel und E. von Hippel (2003): Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations, Research Policy, 32(10), 1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hars, A. und S. Ou (2000): Working for Free? Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. und A. Schussman (2003): The Ecology of Open Source Development, Working Paper accessible at http://opensource.mit.edu.

  • Herstatt, C. und J. Sander (2004): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., S. Niedner und S. Hermann (2003): Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: an Internet-based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel, Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, F. und P. Johnson (2002): On the Pareto Distribution of Sourceforge Projects, Proceedings of the OSS Software Development Workshop Newcastle, 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C.M. (2001): Free Software/Free Science, First Monday 612, available at http://www.firstmonday.org.

  • Kollock, P. (1999): The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace, in: Smith, M.A. und P. Kollock (Hrsg.): Communities in Cyberspace, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, S. (2002): Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects, First Monday, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, E. und E. von Hippel (2003): How Open Source Software Works: „Free“ User-to-User Assistance, Research Policy, 32(7), 923–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. und R.G. Wolf (2003): Why Hackers Do What They Do, MIT Working Paper 4425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. und J. Tirole (2002): Some Simple Economics of Open Source, Journal of Industrial Economics, 52 (June), 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg, J. (2000): Open Source Movements as Model for Organizing, European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. und R.J. Laubacher (1998): The Dawn of the E-Lance Economy, Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr (1990): Talking about Machines. An Ethnography of a Modern Job, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., S. Rota und I. von Wartburg (2002): Open Source — New Rules in Software Development, Working Paper, Universität Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, R., P. Harrer und N. Franke (2004): Die “Sims”: Eine Fallstudie zum gemeinsamen Einsatz von “Toolkits for User Innovation” und virtuellen Communities, in: Herstatt, C. und J. Sander (Hrsg.): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities, Wiesbaden, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. (1999): The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, Cambridge (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M.A. (2004): Decoding the Free/Open Source Software Puzzle: a Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Contributions, Université degli Studi di Siena Working Paper, accessible at http://opensource.mit.edu.

  • Shah, S. (2000): Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment, Sloan Working Paper 4105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S. und E. von Hippel (2002): Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value, Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvalds, L. (1998): What Motivates Free Developers?, First Monday 33, available at http://firstmonday.org.

  • Urban, G.L. und J. Hauser (2004): “Listening in” to Find and Explore New Combinations of Customer Needs, Journal of Marketing, 68 (April), 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2002): Horizontal Innovation Networks — by and for Users, MIT Working Paper 4366-02.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005): Democratizing Innovation, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. und R. Katz (2002): Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits, Management Science, 48(7), 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. (2002): The Communal Resource and Information Systems, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(2), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., I. Nonaka und M. Aben (2001): Making the Most of Your Company’s Knowledge: A Strategic Framework, Long Range Planning, 34(2), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E.C. (1998): Communities of Practice — Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E.C. und W. Snyder (2000): Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier, Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K. und H.G. Gemünden (2004): Die Integration von Kunden in Communities of Practice, in: Herstatt, C. und J. Sander (Hrsg.): Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities, Wiesbaden, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlyn, D. (2003): Gift Economies in the Development of Open Source Software: Anthropological Reflections, Research Policy 32(7), 1287–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franke, N. (2005). Open Source ft Co.: Innovative User-Netzwerke. In: Albers, S., Gassmann, O. (eds) Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_38

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-322-90787-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-90786-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics