Skip to main content

Intangibles and Stock Prices: How Leaders Build Market Value

  • Chapter
Investor Marketing

Zusammenfassung

An important change has occurred in the way we understand market value. Traditionally, when a firm earns more money, its market value goes up. The more it earns, the more investors value it. In recent years, however, this logic has evolved. Firms in the same industry and with similar earnings have vastly different market values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. See Lev, B./Zarowin, P., „The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them,“ Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1999): 353–385.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Lev, B., Intangibles (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Ernst & Young, Innovation Partnership Newsletter (November 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Lev (2001); Eccles, R. G./Herz, R./Keegan, M./Philips, D., Value Reporting Revolution (New York: Wiley, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanous, P. Investment Gurus: A Road Map to Wealth From the World’s Best Money Managers (New York: New York Institute of Finance, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Byrnes, N./Henry, D., „Confused about earnings?“ Business Week, November 26, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cited in study by Ernst & Young, „Measures That Matter,“ 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Lev (2001); p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Lev (2001); p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Eccles et al. (2001), pp. 4–5 and p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Ernst & Young (2000), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Kaplan, R. S./Norton, D. P., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Porter, M., „What Is Strategy,“ Harvard Business Review (November-December 1996): 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Kaplan, R. S./Norton, D. P., The Strategy Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Eccles et al. (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Eccles et al. (2001), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Kaplan/Norton (2001), pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Kaplan/Norton (2001), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Becker, B. E./Huselid, M. A./Ulrich, D., The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Rucci, A./Kirn, S./Quinn, R. „The Employee-Customer-Profit Chain at Sears.“ Harvard Business Review (January-February 1998): 82–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Ulrich, D./Lake, D. Organization Capability: Competing from the Inside/Out (New York: Wiley, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Ulrich, D., „Organizing Around Capabilities,“ in Hesselbein, F./Goldsmith, M./ Beckhard, D. (eds.), The Organization of the Future (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ulrich, D. „Profiling Organizational Competitiveness: Cultivating Capabilities,“ Human Resource Planning 16, no. 3 (1993): 1–17;

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ulrich, D./Wiersema, M. „Gaining Strategic and Organizational Capability in a Decade of Turbulence,“ Academy of Management Executive 3, no. 2 (1989): 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. See Heskett, J. L./Schlesinger, L. A. „Leading the High-Capability Organizations: Challenges for the Twenty-First Century,“ Human Resource Management Journal 36, no. 1 (1997): 105–114;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Day, D., „The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,“ Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stalk, G./Evans, P./Shulman, L. E. „Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy“ Harvard Business Review 70, no. 2 (1992): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The „war for talent“ was the topic of a study by the McKinsey consulting organization. See Fishman, C. „War for Talent,“ Fast Company no. 16 (August 1998): 104.

    Google Scholar 

  29. To learn more about building organization capabilities, visit our website, www.rbl.net and try out a demo of The Leadership Toolkit. The Leadership Toolkit contains a short video module (about 10 minutes long) for each of the organization capabilities along with online tools that enable leaders to improve them.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Bernhard Ebel Markus B. Hofer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler /GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ulrich, D.O., Smallwood, N. (2003). Intangibles and Stock Prices: How Leaders Build Market Value. In: Ebel, B., Hofer, M.B. (eds) Investor Marketing. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90350-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90350-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-322-90351-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-90350-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics