Skip to main content

Literatur

  • Chapter
Konnektionismus

Part of the book series: Psycholinguistische Studien ((PLS))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Achinstein, P. (1968). Concepts of Science. Baltimore, ML: Hopkins

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, A., Demers, R.A., Farmer, A.K. & Harnish, R.M. (1990). Linguistics. An Introduction to Language and Communication, 3. Auflage. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In: D. laBerge & S.J. Samuels (Hrsg.), Basic Process in Reading: Perception and Comprehension, 27–90. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, Memory and Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. & Bower, G. (1973). Human Associative Memory. Washington, DC: Winston-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, C. & Siekevitz, P. (1989). Die Plastizität der Hirnentwicklung. Spektrum der Wissenschaften, 89 /2, 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. Über Gedächtnis und Erinnerung [De memoria et reminiscentia]. In: Aristoteles, Lehrschriften, 9: Kleine Schriften zur Seelenkunde, 62 — 75. Herausgegeben, übertragen und in ihrer Entstehung erläutert von P. Gohlke. Paderborn: Schöningh, (2. Auflage 1953 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B.J., Motley, M.T. & MacKay, D.G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 14, 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1987). The case against accommodation: Evidence from German speech Berg, T. (1985). Is voice a suprasegmental? Linguistics, 23, 883–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1986a). The problems of language control: Editing, monitoring, and feedback. Psychological Research, 48, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1986b). The monophonematic status of diphthongs revisited. Phonetica, 43, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1988). Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivierungsflußmodell. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1989a). On the internal structure of polysyllabic monomorphemic words: The case for superrimes. Studia Linguistica, 43, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1989b). Review Article: MacKay (1987). Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 8, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1990). Toward a theory of error detection and correction. Ms. Universität Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1970). Fehler-Linguistik. In: F. Kiefer & D.M. Perlmutter (Hrsg.), Syntax und generative Grammatik, 1, 27–53. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenaion, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. (1982). Towards a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. (1987a). Co-ordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In: A.W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 3, 337–390. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. (1987b). Exploring levels of processing in sentence production. In: G. Kempen (Hrsg.), Natural Language Generation, 351–363. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J.K. & Warren, R.K. (1895). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookman, L.A. (1987). A microfeature based scheme for modelling semantics. IJCAI 87, 2, 611–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R.J. (1979). On the epistemological status of semantic networks. In: N.V. Findler (Hrsg.), Associative Networks–Representation and the Use of Knowledge by Computers, 3–50. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. (1971). Classification without identification in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 467–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. & McNeill, D. (1966). The “Tip of the Tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 5, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1980a). (Hrsg.), Language Production, 1. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1980b). Some constraints on models of language production. In: B. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Language Production, 1, 423–459. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J.R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial intelligence approach to computer aided instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, MMS-11, No. 4, 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs, A. & Stemberger, J.P. (1988). A processing constraint on inflectional homonymy. Linguistics, 26, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clocksin, W.F. & Mellish, C.S. (1981). Programming in PROLOG. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R.A, Jakimik, J. & Cooper, W.E. (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society in America, 64, 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.M. & Quillian, M.R. (1972). How to make a language user. In: E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Hrsg.), Organization of Memory, 309–351. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.E. & Ross, J.R. (1975). Word order. In: R.E. Grossman, L.J. San & T.J. Vance (Hrsg.), Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, 63–111. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, G.W. (1985). Connectionist parsing. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of Cognitive Science, 201–211. Irvine, CA: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, G.W. (1989). A Connectionist Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, G.W. & Small, S. (1983). A connectionistic scheme for modelling word sense disambiguation. Cognition and Brain Theory, 1, 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1981). The reliability of speech error data. Linguistics, 19, 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchical connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of prediction from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S. & Reich, P.A. (1980). Toward a unified model of slips of the tongue. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in Linguistic Performance, 273–286. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S. & Reich, P.A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSmedt, K. & Kempen, G. (1987). Incremental sentence production, self-correction, and coordination. In: G. Kempen (Hrsg.), Natural Language Generation, 365–376. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, J. (1986). Parallelverarbeitung in netzwerkbasierten Systemen. In: GWAI-85, 9th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings, 26–34. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C.P. & Dyer, M.G. (1987). Toward the evolution of symbols. In: J.J. Grefenstette (Hrsg.), Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, 123–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B.A. (1982). Effects of sentence size and network distance on retrieval speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 173–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drosdowski, G. (Hrsg.) (1984). Duden „Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache“, 4., völlig neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, J.W. (1974). Syntax in mind-sentence. Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 1, III.1–1I1. 25. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckmiller, R. (1987). Neural control of pursuit eye movements. Physiological Reviews, 67, 797–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1987a). Die Simulation von „covert repairs“. Ms., Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1987b). CheOPS: An Object-oriented Programming Environment in C-PROLOG. Kolibri-Arbeitsbericht, 4. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1987c). Object-oriented Programming in PROLOG. In: H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Hrsg.), PROLOG und PROLOG-Anwendungen. FSP Mathematisierung. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1989). Ein Prozeßmodell für die Produktion von „covert repairs“. Ms., Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikmeyer, H.-J., Kindt, W., Laubenstein, U., Lisken, S., Polzin, T., Rieser, H. & Schade, U. (1991). Kohärenzkonstitution im gesprochenen Deutsch. In: G. Rickheit (Hrsg.), Kohärenzprozesse — Modellierung von Sprachverarbeitung in Texten und Diskursen, 59–136. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essler, W.K. (1971). Wissenschaftstheorie II — Theorie und Erfahrung. Freiburg: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanty, M. (1986). Context-free parsing with connectionist networks. In: J.S. Denker (Hrsg.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 151. New York, NY: American Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D.A. & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J.A. (1981). A connectionist model of visual memory. In: G.E. Hinton & J.A. Anderson (Hrsg.), Parallel Models of Associative Memory, 49–81. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J.A. & Ballard, D.H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, 205–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J.A, Fanty, M.A. & Goddard, N.H. (1988). Computing with structured neural networks. Computer, 88 /3, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forschergruppe Kohärenz (Hrsg.)(1987).,’n Gebilde oder was’ — Daten zum Dis- kurs über Modellwelten. Kolibri-Arbeitsbericht,2. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forschergruppe Kohärenz (Hrsg.)(1990). Kohärenz. Kolibri-Arbeitsbericht,1. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V.A. (Hrsg.)(1973). Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. Den Haag: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima, K. (1975). Cognition: A self-organizing multilayered neural network. Biological Cybernetics, 20, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti, G. (1976). The relationship between semantic impairment in comprehension and naming in aphasic patients. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 11, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti, G. et al. (1981). The relationship between type of naming errors and semantic lexical discrimination in aphasic patients. Cortex, 17, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In: G. Bower (Hrsg.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 133–177. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in speech production. In: B. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Language Production, 1, 177–220. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1988). Processes in language production. In: F.J. Newmeyer, Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, III, 69–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigley, H.M. (1984). Neurolinguistically Constrained Simulation of Sentences Comprehension: Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Brain Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, H. & Jonides, J. (1976). The cost of categorization in visual search: Incomplete processing of targets and field items. Perception and Psycho-physics, 20, 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1974/1975). Alternative conceptions of semantic memory. Cognition, 3, 313–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of visual coding, memory, and development. In: E. Leeuwenberg & H. Buffert (Hrsg.), Formal Theory of Visual Perception, 7–26. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, T.A. (1990). Environmental contamination of normal speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organisation of Behavior. New York, NY: Wiley. Hillis, W.D. (1985). The Connection Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G.E. & Anderson, J.A. (Hrsg.) (1981). Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeppner, W. (1988). Konnektionismus, Künstliche Intelligenz und Informatik — Beziehungen und Bedenken. KI, 88 /4, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, T. (1988). A connectionist parser. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Con- ference of the Cognitive Science Society, 18–25. Irvine, CA: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F. & Thomson, J. (1986). Akustische Verständigung bei Grillen. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 86 /2, 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A.N. & Waibel, A.H. (1990). Parsing with connectionist networks. In: M. Tomita, Current Issues in Parsing Technology, 243–260. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N., Herrmann, D.J. & Chaffin, R. (1984). Only connections: A critique of semantic networks. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 292–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J. & Gleitman, H. (1972). A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J. & Gleitman, H. (1976). The benefit of categorization in visual search: Target location without identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josin, G. (1987). Neural-network heuristics. Byte, 87 /10, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, W. (1986). Nervensystem und Sinnesorgane. Kahle, W., Leonhardt, H. & Platzer, W. (Hrsg.), Taschenatlas der Anatomie, 3 (5. überarbeitete Auflage). Stuttgart: Thieme; München: DTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.R. & Schwartz, J.H. (1982). Molecular biology of memory: Modulation of transmitter release. Science, 218, 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemke, C. (1988). Der Neuere Konnektionismus–Ein Überblick. Informatik-Spektrum, 88 /11, 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, W. & Laubenstein, U. (1991). Reparaturen und Koordinationskonstruktionen. Kolibri-Arbeitsbericht, 20. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. & Leuninger, H. (1988). Gestörtes und nicht gestörtes Sprachverhalten: Zur Struktur lautlicher Fehlleistungen. Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen, 4, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J.D.M. (1969). The detection and correction of slips of the tongue. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence, 132–143. Den Haag: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J.D.M. (1980). Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, 287–305. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Chun, Y. (1985). Une procédure d’apprentissage pour réseau à seuil asymétrique. Proceedings of Cognitiva 85, 599–604. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, W.G. (1987). Possible implications of connectionism. In: Y. Wilks (Hrsg.), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, 3, 78–83. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuninger, H. (1988). Das ist wirklich ein dickes Stück: Überlegungen zu einem Sprachproduktionsmodell. In: J. Bayer (Hrsg.), Grammatik und Kognition, 24–40. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, G. (1986). Synapses, Circuits, and the Begining of Memory. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from speech errors. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.G. (1974). On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.G. (1979). Lexical insertion, inflection and derivation: Creative processes in word production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 477–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.G. (1987). The Organisation of Perception and Action. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. (1988). Connectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. & Kawamoto, A.H. (1986). Mechanisms of sentence processing: Assigning roles to constituents. In: J.L. McClelland & D.E. Rumelhart (Hrsg.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2 ), 272–325. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1, An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meringer, R. (1908). Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin: Behr’s Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meringer, R. & Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschen’sche Verlagshandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A.S. (1988). Phonological Encoding in Language Production. Katholieke Universiteit to Nijmegen: Promotionsschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.E. & Gordon, P.C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.L. (1954). Neural Nets and the Brain-Model Problem. Princeton University: Promotionsschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.L. (Hrsg.)(1968). Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.L. & Papert, P. (1969). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M.T., Camden, C.T. & Baars, J.B. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, H. & Mori, T. (1988). A parser based on a connectionist model. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 88), 454–458. Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R.S. (1973). Can characters be classified directly as digits vs. letters or must they be identified first? Memory and Cognition, 1, 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, S.G. (1969). The tongue slips into patterns. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence, 144–156. Den Haag: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, S.G. (1980). Speaking and unspeaking: Detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, 87–95. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., Rumelhart, D.E. & the LNR Research Group (Hrsg.) (1975). Exploration in Cognition. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, G. (1987). Syntax, semantics, and garden paths. In: A.W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 3, 233–252. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, G. (1982). Neural Assemblies. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.B. (1985). Learning Logic (TR-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Computational Research in Economics and Management Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. & Birdsong, D. (1979). Speakers’ sensitive to rules of frozen word order. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J. & Waltz, D.L. (1986). Interpretation of natural language. BYTE, 86 /2, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1972). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 4. Auflage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. & Nattkemper, D. (1986). Effect of secondary tasks on search performance. Psychological Research, 48, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W., Meinecke, C. & Hielscher, M. (1987). Effect of stimulus degradation on category search. Acta Psychologica, 64, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M.R. (1968). Semantic memory. In: M.L. Minsky (Hrsg.), Semantic Information Processing, 227–259. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (1981). Does activation really spread? Psychological Review, 88, 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R.G. (1984). A connectionist model of some aspects of anaphor resolution. Coling 84, 144–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickheit, G. (Hrsg.) (1991). Kohärenzprozesse — Modellierung von Sprachverarbeitung in Texten und Diskursen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, H., Martinetz, T. & Schulten, K. (1990). Neuronale Netze: Eine Einführung in die Neuroinformatik selbstorganisierender Netzwerke. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.M. & Moulton, J. (1985). Models for language cognition. In: A.W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, 1–44. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F. (1959). Two theorems of statistical separability in the perceptron. In: Mechanization of Thought Processes: Proceedings of a Symposium held at the National Physical Laboratory, Nov. 1958, 1, 421–456. London: HM Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. New York, NY: Spartan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. & Williams, R.J. (1986a). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. & Williams, R.J. (1986b). Learning internal representations by error propagating. In: D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing, 318–362. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., Lindsay, P.H. & Norman, D.A. (1972). A process model for longterm memory. In: E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Hrsg.), Organization and Memory, 198–246. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. (1987).,Fischers Fritz fischt fische Fische’ — konnektionistische Modelle der Satzproduktion. Kolibri-Arbeitsbericht,6. Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. (1988). Ein konnektionistisches Modell für die Satzproduktion. In: J. Kindermann & C. Lischka (Hrsg.), Workshop Konnektionismus, Arbeitspapiere der GMD, 329, 207–220. St. Augustin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. (1989). A note on K.Bock’s “Syntactic adjustment effect” problem. In: J. Retti & K. Leidlmair (Hrsg.), 5. Österreichische Artificial-Intelligence-Tagung: Proceedings, 218–223. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. (1990). Kohärenz und Monitor in konnektionistischen Sprachproduktionsmodellen. In: G. Dorffner (Hrsg.), Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung (KONNAI): Proceedings, 18–27. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. & Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1990). Modelling attention in a connectionist production model. In: R. Eckmiller, G. Hartmann & G. Hauske (Hrsg.), Parallel Processing in Neural Systems and Computers. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, U. & Eikmeyer, H.-J. (1991). „wahrscheinlich sind meine Beispiele soo sprunghaft und und und eh ehm zu zu telegraph“ — Konnektionistische Modellierung von „covert repairs”. In: Christaller, Th. (Hrsg.), GWAI-91. 15. Fachtagung für Künstliche Intelligenz: Proceedings, 264–273. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnelle, H. (1987). The challenge of concrete linguistic description: Connectionism, massively parallel distributed processing, net-linguistics. GENET, 24. Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. et al. (1982). Automatic access of the meaning of ambiguous words in context: some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellman, B. & Hirst, G. (1985). A rule-based connectionist parsing system. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society, 212–221. Irvine, CA: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production. In: W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Hrsg.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, 295–342. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1982a). Position of errors in tongue twisters and spontaneous speech: Evidence for two processing mechanisms? MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, Speech Communication, Working Papers, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1982b). Three kinds of speech error evidence for the role of grammatical elements in processing. In: L.K. Obier & L. Menn (Hrsg.), Exceptional Language and Linguistics, 133 —142. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of the word-onset consonants in speech planing: New evidence from speech error patterns. In: E. Keller & M. Gropnik (Hrsg.), Motor and Sensory Processes of Language, 17–51. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. (1979). Cognition and hesitation in speech. In: A. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Hrsg.), Of Speech and Time: Temporal Speech Patterns in Interpersonal Contexts, 151–178. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, S., Cottrell, G. & Shastri, L. (1982). Toward connectionist parsing. AAAI, 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M.J. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). The production of sentences, utterances and speech acts: Have computers anything to say? In: B. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Language Production, 1, 111–141. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1982). The Lexicon in a Model of Language Production. University of California, San Diego, CA: Promotionsschrift. Veröffentlicht bei: New York, NY: Garland, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1983). Lexical access and serial order in sentence production. Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1984). Wordshape errors in language production. Research on Speech Perception, Progress Report, 10, 265–300. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In: A.W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Progress in the Psydhology of Language, Vol. 1, 143–186. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35, 123–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, L. & Shapiro, E. (1986). The Art of PROLOG: Advanced Programming Techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C.F. (1979). Die Nervenzelle. Spektrum der Wissenschaften, 79 /11, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.O. (1986). An analysis of the delta rule and the learning of statistical associations. In: Rumelhart & McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing, 444–459. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tent, J. & Clark, J.E. (1980). An experimental investigation into the perception of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. (1990). Connectionism and language processing. In: G. Dorffner (Hrsg.), Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung (KONNAI): Proceedings, 208–212. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, C.H. (1987). Speaking, Writing, and Sentence Form: Three Psycho- linguistic Studies. Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen: Promotionsschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (3. Auflage 1958 ). The Computer and the Brain. Yale, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, D.L. (1987). Applications of the connection machine. Computer, 87 /1, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, D.L. & Pollack, J. (1985). Massively parallel processing: A strongly Interactive model of natural languages interpretation. Cognitive Science, 9, 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, P.D. & Schwartz, T. (1988). Neural networks, Part 2. IEEE Expert, 88 /1, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R. (1951). Predicting slips of the tongue. In: V.A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence, 144–156. Den Haag: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbos, P.J. (1974). Beyond Reasoning: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioural Sciences. Harvard University: Promotionsschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1986). The logic of activation functions. In: D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing, 1, 423–443. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willshaw, D. (1981). Holography, associative memory, and inductive generalization. In: G.E. Hinton & J.A. Anderson (Hrsg.), Parallel Models of Associative Memory, 83–104. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willshire, C. (1985). Speech Error Distributions in two Kinds of Tongue Twisters. Unveröffentlichte Arbeit zur Erlangung des Grades eines Bachelor of Science. Clayton, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windrow, G. & Hoff, M.E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show, and Convention, Convention Record, 4, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schade, U. (1992). Literatur. In: Konnektionismus. Psycholinguistische Studien. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85808-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85808-5_7

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12301-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-85808-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics