Abstract
In these lectures I would like to describe a model of hadronic scattering at large momentum transfer, either transverse or longitudinal. This model emphasizes in this regime the importance of forces involving the interchange of constituents of the hadrons, hence the name, CIM, or constituent interchange model.1, 2 As will be shown, this model should not be thought of as being different from quark-quark scattering models, or from QCD (quantum chromodynamics) but contains both of them. Omission of the CIM diagrams is not a consistent approximation. The CIM is, in fact, a rearrangement of standard perturbation theory to take into account the fact that the binding force is very strong in color singlet states. We could call this Singlet Dominance. For example, if one demands that an anti-quark, or \(\bar q,\), be found a large distance from the center of a baryon, the easiest way for it to propagate to such distances is via intermediate states involving light mesonic (singlet) states. But more of this later on when the CIM contributions and their absolute normalization will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Blankenbecler, S. J. Brodsky, and J. F. Gunion, Phys. Lett. B39, 649 (1972); 42, 461 (1973); Phys. Rev. D12, 3469 (1975). Spectator counting rules for structure functions are derived in R. Blankenbecler and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D10, 2973 (1974); J. Gunion, ibid. 10, 242 (1974). The fusion reactions qq̄ MM have been particularly emphasized by P. V. Landshoff and J. C. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. D10,, 891 (1974). See also M. K. Chase and W. J. Stirling, Cambridge U. preprint, DAMTP-77/15 and references therein.
For a general review, see D. Sivers, S. J. Brodsky, R. Blankenbecler, Physics Reports 23C, No. 1 (1976). See also Refs. 13, 15, and S. J. Brodsky, R. Blankenbecler, J. F. Gunion, XII Recontre de Moriond, Flaine, France, March 1977.
I. A. Schmidt and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. D15, 3321 (1977). I. A. Schmidt, SLAC Report No. 2P3, 1977.
M. Duong-Van, K. V. Vasavada, and R. Blankenbecler SLAC-PUB-1882, Phys. Rev. D16, 1389 (1977), and M. Duong-Van and R. Blankenbecler, SLAC-PUB-2P17 (Phys. Rev., in print).
S. D. Drell and T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 316 (1970); Ann. Phys. 6b, 578 (1971).
R. D. Amado and R. M. Woloshyn, IAS preprint 77-0374 (1977). To be published in Phys. Rev.
There is some confusion in the literature on this point. Counting rules giving the energy dependence at fixed angle for exclusive scattering were derived by S. J. Brodsky and G. Farrar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1153 (1973); Phys. Rev. D11., 1309 (1975). V. Matveev, R. Muradyan, and A. Tavhelidze, Nuovo Cimento Lett. 7, 719 (1973).
Spectator counting rules giving the behavior of general G functions wer first derived by R. Blankenbecler and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D16, 2973 (1974).
J. Papp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 601 (1975). J. Papp, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Report LBL-3633 (1975).
R. G. Arnold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 776 (1975). Lower energy data is taken from: J. Elias et al., Phys. Rev. 177, 2075 (1969); and S. Galster et al., Nucl. Phys. B32, 221 (1971).
S. J. Brodsky and B. T. Chertok, Phys. Rev. D14, 3003 (1976).
I. A. Schmidt and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. D16, 1318 (1977). See also A. Fernandez-Pacheco, J. A. Grifols and I. A. Schmidt, SLAC-PUB-1993, (1977).
Compare, for example, with W. B. Atwood and G. B. West, Phys. Rev. D7, 773 (1973).
The data are from, for example, J. W. Cronin et al., Phys. Rev. D11, 3105 (1975). D. Antveasyan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 112 (1977); G. Donaldson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1110 (1976); F. W. Busser et al., Nucl. Phys. B106, 1 (1976); and B. Alper et al., Nucl. Phys. B100, 237 (1975). See ref. 2 for a review of elastic data, and A. Eide et al., Nucl. Phys. B60, 173 (1973). See also H. I. Miettinen, SLAC-PUB-1813, presented at the Third European Symposium on Anti-nucleon-Nucleon Reactions, Stockholm (1976); J. L. Stone et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1315, 1317 (1977); V. Chabaud et al., Phys. Lett. 41B, 209 (1972); A. Donnachie and P. R. Thomas, Nuovo Cimento 19A, 279 (1974).
Our discussion here follows work reported in ref. 2 and in R. Blankenbecler S. J. Brodsky and J. F. Gunion, SLAC-PUB-(to be published). For comparison see B. Pire, Phys. Rev. D15, 3475 (1977).
S. M. Berman and M. Jacob, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1683 (1970); S. M. Berman, J. D. Bjorken, and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. D4, 3388 (1971); J. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D8, 3098 (1973). See also R. F. Cahalan, K. A. Geer, J. Kogut, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D11, 1199 (1975); M. Bander, M. Barnett, D. Silverman, Phys. Lett. 48B, 243 (1974).
In particular see D. Sivers and R. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D16, 679 (1977) and B. Combridge, J. Kripfganz, and J. Ranft, Phys. Lett. 70B, 234 (1977).
In contrast see R. D. Field and R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. D15, 2590 (1977); R. D. Field, R. P. Feynman, and G. C. Fox, CALT-68-595 (1977); G. C. Fox, CALT-68-573 (1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blankenbecler, R. (1979). Composite Hadrons and Relativistic Nuclei. In: Dittrich, W. (eds) Recent Developments in Particle and Field Theory. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83630-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83630-4_2
Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-528-08426-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-83630-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive