Advertisement

Elements of a Natural Language Processing Technology

Chapter
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In order to meet the growing expectations raised by serious market studies for the remainder of the decade, it is commonly agreed that natural language processing must be based on a sound theoretical basis that allows for a simplified construction, adaptation, or modification of natural language programmes to particular tasks. The task is quite a general one, since to the extent that natural language products are software products, the development of natural language programmes needs to take into account at least the dimensions of software-engineering, ergonomics, and linguistic functionality. Successful commercialization of natural language processing is not a natural consequence of more sophisticated linguistics, but primarily requires an efficient management of the linguistic software development cycle, and a clear conception of the use of natural language as a means of communication in general, and human computer interaction in particular.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Carbonell, “Requirements for Robust Natural Language Interfaces: The Language Craft™ and XCALIBUR experiences, Coling: Bonn 1986.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Engelien and McBryde, Natural Language Markets: Commercial Strategies, Ovum Ltd: London 1991.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hausser, Complexity in Left-Associative Grammar, Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 103, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Heid, “Study Eurotra-7: An early outline of the results and conclusions of the Study”, Stuttgart 1991.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hellwig/Bläsi, “Theoretical Basis for Efficient Grammar Checkers, Part II: Automatic Error Detection on Correction”, ESPRIT Project 2315, Translator’s Workbench, Deliverable 1.5: Heidelberg 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Heyer, “Probleme und Aufgaben einer angewandten Computerlinguistik”, KI 1/90.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Heyer/ Kese/ Oemig/ Dudda, “Knowledge Representation and Semantics in a Complex Domain: The UNIX Natural Language Help System GOETHE, Coling: Helsinki 1990, p. 361–363.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Heyer/Khatchadourin/Modiano/Waldhör, “Use and importance of Standard in Electronic Dictionaries: The Compilation Approach for Lexical Ressources, Library and Linguistic Computing, VOL. 9, No. 1, Oxford University Press 1994, 55-64.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Krause, Computer Talk, Olms, Hildesheim 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liebeherr and Specker, Complexity of Partial Satisfaction, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery Vol. 28 No. 2, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Möller, “GOETHE user study: An empirical evaluation of ergonomic aspects of a natural language user interface”, TA TRIUMPH-ADLER AG, Report No. RR-P-91-06: Nürnberg 1991.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Obermeier, Natural language processing technologies in artificial intelligence — The science and industry perspective, Ellis Horwood: Chichester 1989.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Pahl/ Beitz, Konstruktionslehre, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1986.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schnelle,“Beurteilung von Sprachtechnologie und Sprachindustrie”, Colloquium Sprachtechnologie und Praxis der maschinellen Sprachverarbeitung, Reimers-Stiftung: Bad Homburg 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Wahlster, “Zum Fortschritt in der Computerlinguistik”, in: Bétori, Hahn, Pinkal, Wahlster (Hg.), Computerlinguistik und ihre theoretischen Grundlagen, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität Leipzig und Electronic Publishing GmbH NürnbergGermany

Personalised recommendations