Skip to main content

Overview of Construction Procurement Types

  • Chapter
  • 306 Accesses

Part of the book series: Baubetriebswirtschaftslehre und Infrastrukturmanagement ((BAUBWL))

Abstract

In an ideal world the client should have brought forward the initial need for the project in a co-ordinated and controlled way from within its organisation. The client should not have too rigid ideas at this stage of how to go about procuring his “ideal” building, but should have taken all useful advice from within its organisation before bringing forward for the project team’s advice the strategies that it believes will fulfil the objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Walker, 1996, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001, p.22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See also section 6.3.4 regarding early involvement tools.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid. p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, 1996, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See chapter 3.4 for additional information regarding selection processes.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CIOB, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. e.g. CIOB, 1999; Cox and Townsend, 1998; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998; Newcombe, 2001; Pilcher, 1997; Seely, 1997; Smith, 1995; Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001; Walker, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. e.g. Cox and Townsend, 1998; Seely, 1997; Smith, 1995; Walker, 1996; Gralla, 2001, for a German text on this topic.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The QS will give advice on a range of matters relating to the cost of the work as well as preparing some of the contract documente and measuring the work for valuation and variation purposes together with the preparation of the final account. For more information about the role of the quantity surveyor refer to: Seely, 1997; Winter, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pilcher, 1997, p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  20. CIOB, 1999, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pilcher, 1997, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newcombe, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cox and Townsned, 1998, preface.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Walker, 1996, p. 120, Rösel, 1994, p. 102, Sommer, 2000, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walker, 1996, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 35; Walker, 1996, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dielschneider, 2000, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Levey, 1999, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walker, 1996, p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  32. As witnessed in the introduction of: Watson and Speak, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  33. CIOB, 1999, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. refer also to: Seely, 1997, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walker, 1996, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Which have evolved in the United States in the 1960’s, e.g.: Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39; Watson and Speak, 2001, and are estimated to account for approximately 20% of all projects in that country; see: Levey, 1999, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 74; Pilcher, 1997, pp. 29–30; Seely, 1997, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  40. CIOB, 1999, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  41. AGC — Associated General Contractors of America.

    Google Scholar 

  42. AIA — American Institute of Architects.

    Google Scholar 

  43. e.g. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39; Seely, 1997, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seely, 1997, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  47. CIOB, 1999, p. 96; Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seely, 1997, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Watson and Speak, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  50. CIOB, 1999, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Levey, 1999, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dielschneider, 2000, pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Levey, 1999, p. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  55. CIOB, 1999, p.28; Cox and Townsend, 1998, p. 37; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72; Kubal, Miller and Worth, 2000, p. 34; Levy, 1999, p. 34; Ling, Khee and Lim., 2001; Pilcher, 1997, p. 28; Seely, 1997, p. 97; Smith, 1995, p. 152; Walker, 1996, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  56. In the United States this is known as Design — Build.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dielschneider, 2000; Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 72; Ling, Khee and Lim, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Walker, 1996, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Halpin and Woodhead, 1998, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Walker, 1996, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Levey, 1999, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Smith, 1995, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Other typical acronyms used to describe types of concession contracts include: BOOT — Build, Own, Operate, Transfer or DBFM — Design, Build, Finance, Operate. For more acronyms and additional information regarding Privately Financed Concession Contracts refer to: Merna and Smith, 1996a);b).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Newcombe, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Latham, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Walker, 1996, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Walker, 1996, pp. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cox and Townsend, 1998, pp. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001; Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford 2001; Wong, Holt and Cooper., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001; Seely, 1997, pp. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  75. National Economic Development Board.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid. pp. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  77. e.g. Ambrose and Tucker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Seely, 1997, pp. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tookey, Murray, Hardcastle and Langford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Actual worked examples are found in the appendix.

    Google Scholar 

  81. see chapters 4 and 5.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Pilcher, 1997, pp. 30; Seely, 1997, pp. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid. p.118.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pilcher, 1997, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  85. See also 4.5.4 for a brief reference to the German standard contract.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Refer, for example, to Bennet, Baird: NEC and Partnering — The Contract to Building Winning Teams, Thomas Telford. 2001 and McInnis, Wilde: The New Engineering Contract — A Legal Commentary, Thomas Telford, 2001 for more information about the NEC contract.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hill, 2000, p. 6; Latham, 1994, pp. 36; Seely, 1997, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  88. CIOB, 1999, p. 191; Pilcher, 1997, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Booen, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  90. EPC = Engineer, Procure and Construct.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, C. (2003). Overview of Construction Procurement Types. In: Contractor-Led Procurement. Baubetriebswirtschaftslehre und Infrastrukturmanagement. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81614-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81614-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-7947-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-81614-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics