Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anhang

  • Chapter
Unternehmens- und Netzwerkentwicklung in High-Tech-Sektoren

Part of the book series: Betriebswirtschaftslehre für Technologie und Innovation ((BTI,volume 45))

  • 76 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Abschnitt werden Erkenntnisse der Literatur zur Entwicklung von drei verschiedenen Arten von Netzwerken dargestellt: geschlossene Kooperationsnetzwerke, industrielle Kooperationsnetzwerke und persönliche Netzwerke. Diese Zusammenfassung rundet die Darstellung der Netzwerkentwicklung in Kapitel 2 dieser Arbeit ab und gibt ergänzende Hinweise basierend auf einer globalen Perspektive von Netzwerken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Aastrup, Jesper (2000): Change in networks. A critical realist interpretation. IMP conference 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch (1992): Innovation durch kleine Unternehmen. Rainer Bohn Verlag, Berlin. Titel der Originalausgabe: Innovation and small firms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, Allan (2000): How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, Gautam (2000a): Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation. A longitudinal study. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, S. 425–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, Gautam (2000b): The duality of collaboration. Inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almus, Matthias, Dirk Engel, Eric A. Neriinger (1999): Determinanten des Besclläfti- gungswachstums junger Unternehmen in den alten und neuen Bundesländern: Bestehen Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Technologieorientierung?-Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, Bharat N., Taran Khanna (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, Deborah G., Paul S. Goodman, Barbara S. Lawrence, Michael L. Tushman (2001): Time: A new research lens. In: Academy of Management Review, 26 (4), S. 645–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Helén, Per Andersson, Virpi Havila, Asta Salmi (2000): Business network dynamics and M&As: Structural and processual connectedness. IMP conference 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C., Hâkan Hâkansson, Jan Johanson (1994): Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. In: Journal of Marketing, 58, S. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arentzen, Ute, Ulrike Lörcher, Thorsten Hadeler (1997): Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, Africa, Jose de la Torre (1998): Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. In: Organization Science, 9 (3), S. 306–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, Carsten A., Armin Bindewald (1998): Innovation versus Tradition. DtA-Studie zu Abweichungen in der Unternehmensentwicklung innovativer Existenzgründer gegenüber traditionellen Existenzgründern. Wissenschaftliche Reihe, Band 12. Deutsche Ausgleichsbank, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, Ashish, Alfcmso Gambardella (1994): Evaluating technological information and utilizing it. Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24, S. 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, Ellen R. (1990): The interorganizational environment. Network theory, tools, and applications. In: Frederick Williams, David V. Gibson (Hrsg.), Technology transfer: A communication perspective, S. 63–89. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, Björn (1987): Supplier management and technological development. In: Hâkan Hâkansson (Hrsg.), Industrial technological development. A network approach, S. 128–176. Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, Gerd (1998): Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologie-analyse. In: Zukünftige Technologien, 28. VDI, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Klaus, Bernd Erichson, Wulff Plinke, Rolf Weiber (2000): Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einfuhrung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen R., John Freeman, Ralph C. Hybels (1992): Strategie alliances in commercial biotechnology. In: Nitin Nohria, Robert G. Eccles (Hrsg.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, S. 311–347. Harvard Collège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Marty, Syed S. H. Rizvi, Prashant Tewari, Dev Vardhan (2001): How fast is too fast? In: McKinsey Quarterly, 3, S. 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Joel A. C., Tony Calabrese, Brian S. Silverman (2000): Don’t go it alone. Alliance network composition and start-ups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Marco, Philip Lenz (2002): Profitieren von Nanotechnologie. Investment der Zukunft. Finanzbuch Verlag, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellmann, Klaus, Udo Mildenberger (1996): Komplexität und Netzwerke. In: Klaus Bellmann, Alan Hippe (Hrsg.), Management von Unternehmensnetzwerken, S. 121–156. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benson-Rea, Maureen (2000): Performance and the lifecycle of the firm and its networks. IMP conference 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierly III, Paul E., Eric H. Kessler (1999): The timing of strategic alliances. In: Michael A. Hitt, Patricia Gorman Clifford, Robert D. Nixon, Kevin P. Coyne (Hrsg.), Dynamic strategic resources. Development, diffusion and integration, S. 299–321. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, Paul, Alok Chakrabarti (1996): Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. In: Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, Lucio (2001): Self-organizing processes in building entrepreneurial networks. A theoretical and empirical investigation. In: Human Systems Management, 20 (3), S. 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Barabara J. (1992): The operation of intentions in time: The emergence of the new venture. In: Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17 (1), S. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg Holm, Desirée, Kent Eriksson, Jan Johanson (1999): Creating value trough mutual commitment to business network relationships. In: Strategic Management Journal, 20, S. 467–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, Désirée, Jan Johanson (1992): Managing network connections in international business. In: Scandinavian International Business Review, 1 (1), S. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blohm (1980). In: Handwörterbuch der Organisation, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (2002): Standortbestimmung. Nanotechnologie in Deutschland. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, Odd J., Michael B. Arthur (1995): Strategie networks among small firms. Implications for strategy research methodology. In: Journal of Management Studies, 32 (4), S. 419–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, Jürgen (1993): Statistik fur Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Tibor, Andreas Schubert, S. Zsindely (1997): Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Iii: Scientometrics, 38 (2), S. 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, Klaus (1992): R&D cooperation between firms. A perceived transaction cost perspective. In: Management Science, 38 (4), S. 514–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Larry D., Janice M. Beyer, Judy C. Shelter (1995): Building cooperation in a competitive industry. SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. In: Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), S. 113–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnige, Olof (2001): Fonration and change of a network in the Swedish insurance industry. The case of a small firmF’s strategic network. IMP conference 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biihrer, Susanne, et al. (2002): Begleitende Evaluation der Kompetenzzentren der Nanotechnologie. Endbericht. Fraunhofer Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgel, Oliver, Andreas Fier, Georg Licht, Gordon Murray (2000): Internationalisation of high-tech start-ups and fast growth. Evidence for UK and Germany. Discussion Paper No. 00–35. Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, Frank (2002): Mikro- und Nanotechnologie. Ein Überblick. In: Georg Leander Zerbach, Daniel Ständer, Ilka Soot (Redakteure), Mikro- und Nanotechnologie. Branchenreport aus Sicht des Kapitalmarktes, S. 2–6. WGZ-Bank, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. (1992): The social structure of competition. In: Nitin Nohria, Robert G. Eccles (Hrsg.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and, action, S. 57–91. Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. (2000): The network structure of social capital. In: Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, Stephan (2002): Der strategische Wert von Kooperationen im Rahmen der Innovationstätigkeit junger Biotechnologieunternehmen. In: Cornelius Herstatt, Christian Müller (Hrsg.), Management-Handbuch Biotechnologie. Schäffer Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, Tony, Joel A. C. Baum (2000): Canadian Biotech start-ups, 1991–1997. The role of incumbents’ patents and strategic alliances in controlling competition. In: Social Science Research, 29, S. 503–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, Elias G., Everett M. Rogers, Kazuo Kurihara, Marcel M. Allbritton (1998): High-teqhnology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. In: Technovation, 18 (1), S. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, Elias G., Suleiman K. Kassicieh, Raymond Radosevich (2000): Strategic alliances as a source of early-stage seed capital in new technology-based firms. In: Technovation, 20, S. 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Roger, Mingfang Li (1999): Strategic alliances and new product develqpment. An empirical study of the U.S. semiconductor start-up firms. In: Advances in Competitiveness Research, 7 (1), S. 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Neil C., Virginia L. Lewis (1983): The five stages of small business growth. In: Harvard Business Review, 61 (3), S. 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., Daniel A. Levinthal (1990): Absorptive capacity. A new perspective on learning and innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, S. 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, Kathleen R., C. K. Prahaland (1996): A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. In: Organization Science, 7 (5), S. 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, Farok F., Peter Lorange (1988): Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. In: Farok J. Contractor, Peter Lorange (Hrsg.), Cooperative strategies in international business. Joint ventures and technology partnerships between firms, S. 3–28. Lexington Books, Massachusetts/Toronto. H

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsten, Hans (2001): Grundlagen der Koordination in Unternehmungsnetzwerken. In: H. Corsten (Hrsg.), Corsten, Hans, S. 1–57. München/Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, Kerstin, Knut Blind, Hariolf Grupp (1998): Im Vergrößerungsglas. Die Nano-technologie. In: Zukunft nachgefragt. Neues zum Delphi ’98, 1, S. 2–5. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, Kerstin, Knut Blind, Hariolf Grupp (1999): Die Miniaturisierungswelle rollt. In: Zukunft nachgefragt. Neues zum Delphi ’98, 6, S. 4–7. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, Erwin (2002): The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. In: Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), S. 1095–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, Per, Beüson Honig (2003): The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 18, S. 301–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBresson, Chris, Fernand Amesse (1991): Networks of innovators. A review and introduction to the issue. In: Research Policy, 20, S. 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, David L., Charles W. L. Hill (1996): Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development. An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 11, S. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, David L., Charles W. L. Hill (1998): An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances. Evidence from the biotechnology industry. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 14, S. 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, David L., Dona DeCarolis, Joseph Coombs (1999): Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures. An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 15 (3), S. 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Hungbin, Lois S. Peters (2000): Radical innovation and the evolution of interfirm knowledge management. Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich (2002): Strategische Netzwerke oder fluide Figurationen? Reichweiten und Architekturen formalisierter Kooperationsbeziehungen in der Biotechnologie. In: Cornelius Herstatt, Christian Müller (Hrsg.), Management-Handbuch Biotechnologie. Schäffer Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Yves L. (1996): The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? In: Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 17, S. 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Yves, Paul M. Oik, Peter Smith Ring (2000): Formation process of R&D consortia. Which path to take? Where does it lead? In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, Paola, Howard Aldrich (1991): Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (5), S. 305–313. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschek, Stephan, Jörg Sydow (2002): Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze des strategischen Managements. Zwei Perspektiven auf Unternehmungskooperation. In: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schur, Sejo Oh (1987): Developing buyer-seller relationships. In: Journal of Marketing, 51, S. 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H., Harbir Singh (1998): The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. In: Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H., Kentaro Nobeoka (2000): Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network. The Toyota case. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, Mark, Anna Grandori (1997): The forms, costs, and development dynamics of inter-organizational networking. In: Mark Ebers (Hrsg.), The formation of inter-organizational networks, S. 265–286. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, John H., Kim T. Leahy (1994): Stages of small business growth revisited. Insights into growth path and leadership/management skills in low- and high- growth companies. In: W. D. Bygrave, S. Birley, N. C. Churchill, E. Gatewood (Hrsg.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building theories from case study research., In: Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), S. 532–550. •

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Claudia Bird Schoonhoven (1990): Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among, U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, S. 504–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Claudia Bird Schoonhoven (1996): Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. In: Organization Science, 7 (2), S. 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Shona L. Brown (1998): Time pacing: Competing in markets that wont stand still. In: Harvard Business Review, S. 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, Nicolai J. (1996): Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. In: Organization Science, 7 (5), S. 470–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freier, Peter (2000): Etablierungsmanagement innovativer Untemehmensgründungen: Eine empirische Analyse der Biotechnologie. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Harald (2001): Es geht um Schlüsselpatente. Interview. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft Spezial, Nanotechnologie, S. 12–13. Interview durchgeführt von Arne Claussen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, Walter, Markus Helfen, Thomas Meiren, Karl-Christoph Renz, Anne-Sophie Tombeil (2001): Das Management von Wachstum und Erfolg..Ergebnisse einer Kurzstudie zur Organisations- und Personalentwicklung in schnell wachsenden Unternehmen. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Stephen (1989): Semiconductor firm strategies and technological cooperation: A perceived transaction cost approach. In: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 6, S. 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., P. Heydebreck (1994): Technological interweavement. A key success factor for new technology-based firms. In: J. Sydow, A. Windeier (Hrsg.), Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen. Vertrauen, Kontrolle und Informationstechnik, S. 194–211. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., P. Heydebreck (1995): The influence of business strategies on technological network activities. In: Research Policy, 24, S. 831–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., P. Heydebreck, R. Herden (1992): Technological interweavement: A means of achieving innovation success. In: R&D Management, 22 (4), S. 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1990): Innovationen in Geschäftsbeziehungen und Netzwerken. Karlsruhe. Arbeitspapier des Institutes iur Angewandte Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Unternehmensfuhrung der Universität Karlsruhe (TH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1998): Innovationsmanagement als Kooperations-management. Vortrag vor der wissenschaftlichen Kommission Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (2002): Erfolgreiche Innovationskooperationen. Erkenntnisse zu erfolgsbestimmenden Voraussetzungen und Gestaltungsformen aus empirischen Studien. Vortrag G-Forum 2002 in Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg, Thomas Ritter (1999): Innovationserfolg durch Netzwerkkompetenz: Effektives Management von Unternehmensnetzwerken. In: D. Pötschke, M. Weber (Hrsg.): Netzinfrastrukturen und Anwendungen fur die Informationsgesellschaft. Konferenzband zur Info ’98 in Potsdam. S. 45–78. Wilke, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Gerard, Shaker A. Zahra, Kathleen K. Wheatley, Raihan Khan (2001): The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms. In: Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12 (2), S. 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, Amy (1991): Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. In: Research Policy, 20, S. 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres, Benjamin (1994): Group versus group: How alliance networks compete. In: Harvard Business Review, July-August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, Anna, Giuseppe Soda (1995): Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. In: Organization Studies, 16 (2), S. 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark (1985): Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. In: American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), S. 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark (1992): Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Ift: Nitin Nohria, Robert G. Eccles (Hrsg.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, S. 25–56. Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Robert M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, Larry E. (1972): Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. In: Harvard Business Review, July-August, S. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindley, Peter, David C. Mowery, Brian Silverman (1994): SEMATECH and collaborative research: Lessons in the design of high-technology consortia. In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13 (4), S. 723–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Martin Gargiulo (1999): Where do interorganizational networks come from? In: American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), S. 1439–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay (1995a): Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. In: Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), S. 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay (1995b): Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, S. 619–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay (1998): Alliances and networks. In: Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4), S. 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay (1999): Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. In: Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5), S. 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay, James D. Westphal (1999): Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, S. 473–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay, Nitin Nohria, Akbar Zaheer (2000): Strategic networks. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, Lisa K., Harold P. Welsch (2001): The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 16, S. 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, John (1990): Organizational modes of inter-firm co-operation and technology transfer. In: Technovation, 10 (1), S. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, John, Geert Duysters (2002): Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. In: Organization Studies, 23 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (1992): Evolution processes in industrial networks. In: Björn Axelsson, Geoffrey Easton (Hrsg.), Industrial networks. A new view of reality, S. 129–143. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, Hâkan (1987): Introduction. In: Hâkan Hâkansson (Hrsg.), Industrial technological development. A network approach, S. 3–25. Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamfelt, Cecilia, Ann-Kristin Lindberg (1987): Technological development and the individual’s contact network. In: Hâkan Hâkansson (Hrsg.), Industrial technological development. A network approach, S. 177–209. Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, Steven H., Collin J. Watson, Erik Jansen, Gaylen N. Chandler (1993): Tightening the life-cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. In: Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18 (2), S. 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanny, Sebastian (2003): Wenn Unis Gründern Geld geben. In: VDI nachrichten, Nr. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanny, Sebastian (2003): Wenn Unis Gründern Geld geben. In: VDI nachrichten, Nr. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Eric L. (1995): Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. In: Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19 (4), S. 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, Brian, Alexander Ardishvili, Richard Candozo, Tait Elder, John Leuthold, John Parshall, Michael Raghian, Donald Smith (1997): Mapping the university technology transfer process. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 12, S. 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenstein, Martin (2001): Erfolgsdeterminanten von New-Economy-Start-Ups. In: IO-Management, 7 /8, S. 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Bernd (2002): Venture-Capital in der Mikrosystemtechnik und Nanotechnologie. In: Georg Leander Zerbach, Daniel Ständer, Ilka Spot (Redakteure), Mikro- und Nanotechnologie. Branchenreport aus Sicht des Kapitalmarktes, S. 14–19. WGZ-Bank, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusler, Jürgen, Hans-Willy Hohn, Susanne Lütz (1994): Contingencies of innovative networks: A case study of successful interflrm R&D collaboration. In: Research Policy, 23 (1), S. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, A. Heinrike (1999): Erfolgsfaktoren von Wachstumsfuhrern. DtA-Studie zu den Entwicklungspfaden junger Unternehmen. Wissenschaftliche Reihe Band 11. Deutsche Ausgleichsbank, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, Tomas, Johan Eckerstein, Alexander Helm (2001): R&D management through network mapping: Using the Internet to identify strategic network actors in cooperative research networks. In: R&D Management, 31 (3), S. 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Andrew D. (1999): Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, S. 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, Susanne (2001): Current internationalization of firms and markets as reconfiguration in densely connected networks. IMP conference 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, Julie M., William S. Hesterly (2001): The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3), S. 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, Ha (1997): The consequences of network participation for acquisition and alliance activity in the biotechnology industry. In: Best Papers Proceedings, S. 267–271. Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, Ha, Bostjan Antoncic (2002): Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. In: Journal of Business Venturing, in Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Werner H. (2001): Management von Allianz-Portfolios. Strategien fur ein erfolgreiches Unternehmensnetzwerk. Schäffer-Pöschel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hullmann, Angela (2001): Internationaler Wissenstransfer und technischer Wandel: Bedeutung, Einflussfaktoren und Ausblick auf technologiepolitische Implikationen am Beispiel der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland. In: Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik. Schriftenreihe des Fh-ISI, 45. Physiea-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, Sherrie E., Keith G. Provan (2000): Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, S. 327–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungenberg, Harald (1999): Bildung und Entwicklung von strategischen Allianzen. In: Johann Engelhard, Elmar J. Sinz (Hrsg.): Kooperation im Wettbewerb. Neue Formen und Gestaltungskonzepte im Zeichen von Globalisierung und Informationstechnologie, Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung des Verbandes der Hochschullehrer rar Betriebswirtschaft e.V. 1999 in Bamberg, S. 5–29. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, Pia (2001): Mikrosystemtechnik und Nanotechnologie: Schlüsseltechnologien fur Deutschland. Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie., Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Dorothea (1991): Policy networks and change: The case of High-Tc superconductors. In: Bend Marin, Renate Mayntz (Hrsg.): Policy networks, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, S. 137–174. Campus, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Candace, William S. Hesterly, Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist, Stephen P. Borgatti (1998): Professional service constellations: How strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. In: Organization Science, 9 (3), S. 396–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Pierre-André, Richard Lachance (2001): Dynamic regions and high-growth SMEs: Uncertainty, potential information and weak signal networks. In: Human Systems Management, 20, S. 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, Prashant, Harbir Singh, Howard Perlmutter (2000): Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappelhoff, Peter (2000a): Der Netzwerkansatz als konzeptueller Rahmen fïlr eine Theorie interorganisationaler Netzwerke. In: Jörg Sydow, Arnold Windeler (Hrsg.), Steuerung von Netzwerken: Konzepte und Praktiken, S. 25–57. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen/Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappelhoff, Peter (2000b): Komplexitätstheorie und Steuerung von Netzwerken. In: Jörg Sydow, Arnold Windeler (Hrsg.), Steuerung von Netzwerken: Konzepte und Praktiken, S. 347–389. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen/Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kash, Don E., Robert W. Rycoft (2000): Patterns of innovating complex technologies: A framework for adaptive network strategies. In: Research Policy, 29, S. 819–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, Robert K. (1988): Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. In: Academy of Management Journal, 31 (2), S. 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, Robert K., Robert Drazin (1989): An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. In: Management Science, 35 (12), S. 1489–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, David, Frank Wilkinson (1999): Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of high technology SMEs in Europe. In: Regional Studies, 33 (4), S. 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, Thomas (1999): Governance of R&D. Transaction cost, resources, inertia and social capital. In: Michael A Hitt, Patricia Gorman Clifford, Robert D. Nixon, Kevin Coyne (Hrsg.), Dynamic strategic resources: Development, diffusion and integration, S. 323–345. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, Thomas (2000): External corporate venturing. Cognition, speed, and capability development. Dissertation. Otamedia, Espoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, John R. (1980): The life-cycle analogy and the study of organizations: Introduction. In: John R. Kimberly, Robert H. Miles and Associates (Hrsg.), The organizational life-cycle, S. 1–14. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. J., Nathan Rosenberg (1986): An overview of innovation. In: R. Landau, N. Rosenberg (Hrsg.), The positive sum strategy, S. 275–305. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knurhahn, Phil (2003): Erfindungen der Großkonzerne können Start-ups beflügeln. In: VDI nachrichten, Nr. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce (2000): The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emeigence of structure. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce, Weijian Shan, Gordon Walker (1992): The make-or-cooperate decision in the context of an industry network. In: Nitin Nohria, Robert G. Eccles (Hrsg.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action, S. 348–365. Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koka, Balaji R., John E. Prescott (2002): Strategie alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. In: Strategic Management Journal, 23 (9), S. 795–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, Elmar D., Michael Woywode (2001): Erfolgreiches Management von schnell wachsenden Unternehmen. Erste Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojektes. IBU der Universität Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, Knut, Marianne Kulicke, Andrea Zenker (Hrsg.) (2001): Innovation networks. Concepts and challenges in the European perspective. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, Mitchell P., Arie Y. Lewin (1998): The co-evolution of network alliances. In: Organization Science, 9 (3), S. 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, Kristian, Majken Schultz (1993): Informal collaborations in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations. In: Organization Studies, M ( 2 ), S. 189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Peter J., Michael Lubatkin (1998): Relative absorptive capacity and inter- organizational learning. In: Strategic Management Journal, 19, S. 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Andrea (1991): Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 6, S. 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Andrea (1992): Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, S. 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Choonwood, Kyungmook Lee, Johannes M. Pennings (2001): Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. In: Strategic Management Journal, 22, S. 615–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Don Y., Eric W. K. Tsang (2001): The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. In: Jourrial of Management Studies, 38 (4), S. 583–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppin, Karin (2002): Still, verborgen, unsichtbar. In: Die Zeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, Georg, Harald Stahl (1997): Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1996. ZEW, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind, Julia Porter (1996): Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind, Julia Porter, Amalya Lumerman Oliver, Lynne Zucker, Marilynn Brewer (1996): Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. In: Organization Science, 7 (4), S. 428–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, Andrea, Maurizio Sobrero (1994): The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 9, S. 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, Gianni, Andrea Lipparini (1999): The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability. A longitudinal study. In: Strategic Management Journal, 20 (4), S. 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, Gianni, Charles Baden-Fuller (1995): Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. In: California Management Review, 37 (3), S. 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, A. (1992): Coordination and mobilisation processes in industrial networks. In: Björn Axelsson, Geoffrey Easton (Hrsg.), Industrial networks. A new view of reality, S. 144–165. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, Anders (1997): Technological innovation and the emergence and evolution of industrial networks: The case of digital image technology in Sweden. In: David Ford (Hrsg.), Understanding Business Markets. The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Ake (1990): Explaining inter-firm cooperation and innovation. Limits of the transaction cost approach. Entwurf eines Papiers fur den Workshop “Socio-economics of inter-firm cooperation” im Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthardt, Sandra (2000): The impact of different types of innovations on industrial networks. IMP conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütz, Susanne (1997): Learning through intermediaries: The case of inter-firm research collaborations. In: Mark Ebers (Hrsg.), The formation of inter- organizational networks, S. 220–237. Oxford University Press, New York.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, Ravindranath, Balaji R. Koka, John E. Prescott (1998): Networks in transition: How industrial events (re)shape interfirm relationships. In: Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5), S. 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, Helena (2001): On the emergence and structure of a new regional network. In: Human Systems Management, 20, S. 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstedten, Björn Christian (1997): Entwicklung von Organisationsstrukturen in der Gründungs- und Frühentwicklungsphase von Unternehmungen. In: FGF Entrepreneurship Research Monographien, 11. Förderkreis Gründungsforschung e.V., Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1991,): Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. In: Organization Science, 2 (1), S. 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maula, Markku, Erkko Autio, Gordon Murray (2001): Prerequisites for the creation of social capital and subsequent knowledge acquisition on corporate venture capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Jeffrey E., Michael J. Dowling (1994): Using R&D cooperative arrangements to leverage managerial experience: A study of technology-intensivef new ventures. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 9, S. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Martin, Ole Persson (1998): Nanotechnology: Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. In: Scientometrics, 42 (2), S. 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Robert H. (1980): Findings and implications of organizational life cycle research: A commencement. In: John R. Kimberly, Robert H. Miles and Associates (Hrsg.), The organizational life-cycle, S. 430–478. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Danny, Peter H. Friesen (1984): A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. In: Management Science, 30 (10), S. 1161–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milling, Peter (1998): Managementsimulationen im Prozess des organisationalen Lernens. In: Markus Schwaninger (Hrsg.), Intelligente Organisationen. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milling, Peter, Uwe Schwellbach, Jörn-Henrik Thun (2000a): Die Bedeutung des Faktors Zeit für den Erfolg industrieller Unternehmen. Eine empirische Analyse im Rahmen des “World Class Manufacturing”-Projektes. Arbeitspapier Nr. 200G- 02. Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milling, Peter, Uwe Schwelbach, Jörn-Henrik Thun (2000b): The role of spe&4 in manufacturing. In: J. A. D. Machuca, T. Mandakovic (Hrsg.), POM facing the new millenium. Evaluating the past, leading with the present and planning the future of operations. Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., A. McHugh (1985): Strategy formation in an adhocraey. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, S. 160–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita, Michiya, Hideaki Kitanaka, Peter M. Milling, Uwe Schwelbach, Jörn-Henrik Thun (2000): High-speed competence and short life cycle. In: J. A. D. Machuca, T. Mandakovic (Hrsg.), POM facing the new millenium. Evaluating the past, leading with tlie present and planning the future of operations. Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlacchi, Pieraiigela (2001): Emergent technologies and inter-organisational networks in medical device industry. Beitrag zur Konferenz “The future of innovation studies”. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Christian, Cornelius Herstatt (2002): Strategische Unternehmensplanung für Start-ups aus der Biotechnologie. In: Cornelius Herstatt, Christian Müller ( Hrsg. ), Management-Handbuch Biotechnologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • n. n. (2001): Survey of networks in nanotechnology. Cordis, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • n. n. (2003): KMU-Definition: Definition kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen der Europäischen Kommission. Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neriinger, Eric, Georg Berger (1995): Regionale Verteilung technologieorientierter Unternehmensgründungen. Diskussionspapier Nr. 95–23. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuy, Christine (2002): Mikro- und Nanotechnologie. Die Anwendungen. In: Georg Leander Zerbach, Daniel Ständer, Ilka Soot (Redakteure), Mikro- und Nanotechnologie. Branchenreport aus Sicht des Kapitalmarktes, S. 7–13. WGZ- Bank, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, Edwin J., Rik van Reekum, Henriette E. Hulshoff (2001): Gathering and using information for the selection of technology partners. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67 (2–3), S. 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, Nitin (1992): Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In: Nitin Nohria, Robert G. Eccles (Hrsg.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, S. 1–22. Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofori-Dankwa, Joseph, Scott D. Julian (2001): Complexifying organizational theory: Illustrations using time research. In: Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), S. 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Amalya L. (2001): Strategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firms. In: Organization Studies, 22 (3), S. 467–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Amalya L., Julia Porter Liebeskind (1998): Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: Implications for studying interorganizational networks. In: International Studies of Management & Organization, 27 (4), S. 76–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Amalya L., Mark Ebers (1998): Networking network studies: An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships. In: Organization Studies, 19 (4), S. 549–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Richard N., John Hagedoorn (1997): The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. In: Academy of Management Journal, 40, S. 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostgaard, Tone A., Sue Birley (1994): Personal networks and firm competitive strategy: A strategic or coincidental match? In: Journal of Business Venturing, 9, S. 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostgaard, Tone A., Sue Birley (1996): New venture growth and personal networks. In: Journal of Business Research, 36, S. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Seung Ho, Roger (Rongxin) Chen, Scott Gallagher (2002): Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in Semiconductor start-ups. In: Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3), S. 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, Margaret A. (1993): The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource’s based view. In: Strategic Management Journal, 14, S. 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P. (1990): The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Iw. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, S. 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleschak, Franz, Frank Stummer, Birgit Ossenkopf (2000): Erfolgsmodell Futour. Technologieorientierte Unternehmensgründungen in den Neuen Ländern. Studie des Fh-ISI im Auftrag der tbg der DtA. Fraunhofer Institut Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung, Karlsruhe/Freiberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, Joel M. (1994): Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, S. 458–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (1991): Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. In: Strategic Management Journal, 12, S. 95–117. John Wiley & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter (1990): Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In: Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, S. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W. (1998): Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. In: California Management Review, 40 (3), S. 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, Laurel Smith-Doerr (1996): - Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, S. 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, Laurel Smith-Doerr, Jason Owen-Smith (1999): Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In: Steven Andrews, David Knoke (Hrsg.), Networks in and around organizations. Research in the sociology of organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prange, Christiane (1996): Interorganisationales Lernen: Lernen in, von und zwischen Organisationen. In: G. Schreyögg, P. Conrad (Hrsg.), Managementforschung, 6, S. 163–189. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles C., Howard S. Becker (1992): What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, K., S. Ramnarayan (1993): Entrepreneurial orientation and networking: Some Indian evidence. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 8, S. 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, Michael, Christian Belz (2000): Marketing für die Nanotechnologie. In: IO-Management, 9, S. 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiß, Michael (2001): Netzwerk-Kompetenz. In: H. Corsten (Hrsg.), Unternehmungsnetzwerke. Formen unternehmungsübergreifender Zusammenarbeit. München/Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, Jeffrey J., Maurizio Zollo (1999): Managing governance adaptations in strategic alliances. In: European Management Journal, 18 (2), S. 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Thomas (1998): Innovationserfolg durch Netzwerk-Kompetenz: Effektives Management von Unternehmensnetzwerken. Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Thomas, Hans G. Gemünden (2001): The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. In: Journal of Business Research, eingereicht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Thomas, Hans G. Gemünden (2003): Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. In: Journal of Business Reseafch, in Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Thomas, Ian F. Wilkinson, Wesley J. Johnston (2002): Measuring network competence: Some international evidence. In: Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17 (2/3), S. 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotering, Joachim (1993): Zwischenbetriebliche Kooperation als alternative Organisationsform: Ein transaktionskostentheoretischer Erklärungsansatz. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens, David Krackhardt (2000): Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S., H. G. Gemünden, F. Billing (2003): Dynamisches Schnittstellen-management radikaler Innovationsvorhaben. In: C. Herstatt, B. Verworn (Hrsg.): Management der frühen Innovationsphasen: Grundlagen, Methoden, neue Ansätze, 161–194. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, Ron, Aimé Heene (1997): Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. In: European Manàgeme’nt Journal, 15 (3), S. 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, Michael D. (2000): Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures. In: Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11 (2), S. 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B., R. A. J. Echambadi, Jeffrey S. Harrison (2001): Alliance entrepreneur- ship and firm market performance. In: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6–7), S. 701–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, AnnaLee (1991): The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. In: Research Policy, 20 (5), S. 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, Rüdiger (1998): Unternehmensnetzwerke bei kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. In: Udo Winand, Klaus Nathusius (Hrsg.), Unternehmensnetzwerke und virtuelle Organisationen, S. 79–91. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaitis, Judith (1998): The alliances of spin-offs versus start-ups: Social ties in the • genesis of post-Soviet Alliances. In: Organization Science, 9 (3), S. 368–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Weijian (1990): An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms. In: Strategic Management Journal, 11, S. 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Weijian, Gordon Walker, Bruce Kogut (1994): Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. In: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (5), S. 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Brian (1993): Formal and informal networks in the UK medical equipment industry. In: Technovation, 13 (6), S. 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Yuwei (1998): The effects of tasks on semiconductor start-up alliance dissolution: A structuration perspective. In: Journal of High-Technology Management, 9 (1), S. 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, Rodney C., Mark Simon (1997): Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 12, S. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjurts, Insa (2000): Kollektive Unternehmensstrategie: Grundfragen einer Theorie kollektiven strategischen Handelns. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Helen Lawton, Keith Dickson, Stephen Lloyd Smith (1991): “There are two sides to every story”: Innovation and collaboration of large and small firms. In: Research Policy, 20, S. 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snellman, Kaisa (2001): Evolution of exchange relationships: Past research and future directions (work in progress). IMP conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles C., James B. Thomas (1993): Building networks: Broker roles and behaviours. In: Peter Lorange, Bala Chakravarthy, Johan Roos, Andrew Van de Ven (Hrsg.), Implementing strategic processes: Change, learning and cooperation, S. 217–238. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (1996): Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C., Robert M. Grant (1996): Knowledge and the firm: Overview. In: Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, Morten, Everett M. Rogers, Kristen Speakman (1999): Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 15, S. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, Lloyd, Royston Greenwood (2000): Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. In: Organization Studies, 21 (1), S. 163–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stix, Gary (2001): Geschäfte im Reich der Zwerge. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft Spezial, Nanotechnologie, S. 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Toby E. (1998): Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, S. 668–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Toby E., Ha Hoang, Ralph C. Hybels (1999): Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, S. 315–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg (1992): Strategische Netzwerke: Evolution und Organisation. Habilitationsschrift. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg (1999): Management von Netzwerkorganisationen: Zum Stand der Forschung. In: Jörg Sydow (Hrsg.), Management von Netzwerkorganisationen: Beiträge aus der “Managementforschung”, S. 279–314. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg, Arnold Windeler (2000): Steuerung von und in Netzwerken: Perspektiven, Konzepte, vor allem aber offene Fragen. In: Jörg Sydow, Arnold Windeler (Hrsg.), Steuerung von Netzwerken: Konzepte und Praktiken, S. 1–24. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen/Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. (1992): Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, S. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, Amy Shuen (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In: Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), S. 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David, Gary Pisano (1994): The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. In: Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3), S. 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun, Jörn-Henrik, Peter M. Milling, Uwe Schwellbach, Michiya Morita, Sadao Sakakibara (2000): Production cycle time as a source of unique strategic competiveness. An empirical analysis based on the “World Class Manufacturing”-project. In: J. A. D. Machuca, T. Mandakovte (Hrsg.), POM facing the new millennium. Evaluating the past, leading with the present and planning the future of operations. Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, Noel M. (1980): Problem cycles in organizations and the management of change. In: John R. Kimberly, Robert H. Miles and Associates (Hrsg.), The organizational life-cycle, S. 164–183. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tödtling, Franz (1994): Regional networks of high-technology firms: The case of the Greater Boston region. In: Technovation, 14 (5), S. 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wenpin (2000): Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21 (9), S. 925–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschandl, Martin (2000): Phasenmodell der Entstehung eines virtuellen Unternehmens. In: IO-Management, 12, S. 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian (1996): The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. In: American Sociological Review, 61, S. 674–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian (1997): Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, S. 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aken, Joan E., Mathieu P. Weggeman (2000): Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcoming the Daphne-dilemma. In: R&D Management, 30 (2), S. 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H. (1980): Early planning, implementation, and performance of new organizations. In: John R. Kimberly, Robert H. Miles and Associates (Hrsg.), The organizational life-cycle, S. 83–134. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H., Gordon Walker (1984): The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, S. 598–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, Wim, Geert Duysters, Bonnie Beerkens (2001): Technological capability building through networking strategies within high-tech industries. Beitrag zur Konferenz “The future of innovation studies”. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, Wim, Niels G. Noorderhaven (2001): Competition between alliance blocks: The case of the RISC microprocessor technology. In: Organization Studies, 22 (1), S. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Gordon, Bruce Kogut, Weijian Shan (1997): Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. In: Organization Science, 8 (2), S. 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley, Katherine Faust (1994): Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisenfeld, Ursula, James C. Reeves, Astrid Hunck-Meiswinkel (2001): Technology management and collaboration profile: Virtual companies and industrial platforms in the high-tech biotechnology industries. In: R&D Management, 31 (1), S. 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenberger-Eibl, Marion A. (2000): Lebenszyklen und Wissensmanagement in Unternehmensnetzwerken. In: IO-Management, 10, S. 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Ian F., James B. Wiley (2000): Modeling the structural dynamics of industrial networks. Beitrag zur “International Conference of Complex Systems”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1991): Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, S. 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1979): Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. In: The Journal of Law and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David T. (1995): An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), S. 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. (1994): Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, Srilata, Stuart Albert, Akbar Zaheer (1999): Time scales and organizational theory. In: Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), S. 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A. (1996): Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 11, S. 289–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Gerard George (2000): Manufacturing strategy and new venture performance: A comparison of independent and corporate ventures in the biotechnology industry. In: Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10 (2), S. 313–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Gerard George (2002): Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. In: The Academy of Management Review, 27 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, Milan (2001): Autopoiesis (self-production) in SME networks. In: Human Systems Management, 20, S. 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Liming, John D. Aram (1995): Networking and growth of young technology- intensive ventures in China. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 10, S. 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Björn Klocke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klocke, B. (2004). Anhang. In: Unternehmens- und Netzwerkentwicklung in High-Tech-Sektoren. Betriebswirtschaftslehre für Technologie und Innovation, vol 45. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81147-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81147-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-0762-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-81147-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation