Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Europäische Union — Marionette oder Regisseur? pp 237–256Cite as

Die Kommission und die Kopenhagener Kriterien: Erweiterte Handlungskapazität jenseits des Beitritts

  • Chapter

  • 238 Accesses

Part of the book series: Forschungen zur Europäischen Integration ((FOEI,volume 10))

Zusammenfassung

Der Europäische Rat von Kopenhagen beschloss 1993 die Osterweiterung der Europäischen Union. Vorangegangen war eine Periode interner Uneinigkeit, ob und wann eine Erweiterung stattfinden sollte (Hoffmann 1993: 140; Deubner 1999: 93). Auch wenn in Kopenhagen das grundsätzliche „Ja“ zur Aufnahme neuer Staaten fiel, waren weder ein Zeitrahmen noch eine umfassende Strategie für das „Wann“ und „Wie“ einer Erweiterung vorhanden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alston, Philip/Weiler, J.H.H. (1999): An „Ever Closer Union“ in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights. In: Aiston, Philip et al. (Hrsg.): The EU and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 3–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandtner, Barbara/Rosas, Allan (1998): The Human Rights and the External Relations of the European Community: An Analysis of Doctrine and Practice. European Journal of International Law, 9, S. 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2000): Compliance and Conditionality. ARENA Working Papers. http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp00_18.htm, 9.1.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, Michelle (2000): From Soft Law to Hard Law? Discretition and Rule-making in the Commission’s State Aid Regime. (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies: European Forum Series). RSC No. 2000/35. http://www.iue.it/ RSCAS/WP-Texts/00_35.pdf, 15.7.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, Andrew (1999): Where is the EU’s Human Rights Common Foreign Policy, and how is it Manifested in Multilateral Fora? In: Alston, Philip et al. (Hrsg.): The EU and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 627–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deubner, Christian (1999): Frankreich in der Osterweiterung der EU, 1989 bis 1997. Politische Studien, 50 (262), S. 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2003): Unterstützung der Roma-Gemeinschaften in Mittel- und Osteuropa. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/docs/pdf/brochure _roma_oct2003_de.pdf, 1.12.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, Marc (2002): The European Convention on Human Rights and the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights — complementary or competing? Menschenrechtskonvention des Europarates und Grundrechtecharta der Europäischen Union: Richtersymposium — Europarat, Luxemburg: 16. September, 2002 http://www.coe.int/T/d/Com/Dossiers/Events/2002–09-ichtersymposium/Fisch bach.asp, 18.02.2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaja, Giorgio (1996): Opinion 2/94, Accession by the community to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, given on March 28 1996, not yet reported. Common Market Law Review, 33, S. 973–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, Heather (2001): How does Europeanization affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), S. 1013–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, Will (2001): Romani Identity and post-Communist policy. In: Guy, Willi (Hrsg.): Between Past and Future: The Roma and Eastern Europe. Hertfordshire: Hertfordshire University Press, S. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidbreder, Eva G./Carrasco, Laura (2003): Assessing the Assessment: A Review on the Application Criterion Minority Protection by the European Commission. EIPA Working Paper: 03/W/04. http://www.eipa.nl, 26.11.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne (2003): New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Efficiency and Policy Effectiveness? In: Börzel, Tanja A. (Hrsg.): The State of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley (1993): The French Dilemmas and Strategies in the new Europe. In: Keohane, R./Nye, J./Hoffmann, S. (Hrsg.): After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies 1989–1991. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, S. 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, James/Sasse, Gwendolyn (2003): Monitoring the Monitors: EU Enlargement Conditionality and Minority Protection in the CEECs. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues, 1. http://www.ecmi.de, 27.11.2003).

  • Nowak, Manfred (1999): Human Rights „Conditionality“ in Relation to Entry and Full Participation in the EU. In: Alston, P. et al. (Hrsg.): The EU and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 687–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Institute (2001): EU Accession Monitoring Program: Minority Protection in the EU Accession Progress. Budapest/New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, John/Bomberg, Elizabeth (1999): Decision-Making in the European Union. Houndmill/Basingstoke/London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Christopher (1995): Obstacles to EU Enlargement: The Classical Community Method and the Prospects for a Wider Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33 (3), S. 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, John/Rosenthal, Glenda G. (1998): The Expanding European Union: Past, Present, Future. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank/Engert, Stefan/Knobel, Heiko (2003): Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (3), S. 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toggenburg, Gabriel (2000): A Rough Orientation Through a Delicate Relationship: The European Union’s Endeavours for (its) Minorities. EIOP, 4 (16), http://euop.org.at/eiop/texte/2000–016a.htm, 17.11.2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, Peter (2001): Advocacy Networks and Romani Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 3. http://www.ecmi.de, 5.12. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, Peter (2003): EU Enlargement and Minority Rights Policies in Central Europe: Explaining Policy Shifts in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minorities in Europe, 1. http://www.ecmi.de, 3.12.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, Peter (2004): Minority Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: Exploring the Impact of the EU’s Enlargement Strategy. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 3 (2). http://www.dhnopolitics.org/archive/volume_in/issue_2/, 4.12.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje (2003): Finality vs. Enlargement: Constitutive Practices and Opposing Rationales in the Reconstruction of Europe. Jean Monnet Working Paper: 200, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/02/020801.html, 9.1.2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Andrew (2000): Enlargement of the Union and Human Rights Conditionality: A Policy of Distinction? European Law Review, 25 (6), S. 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte de, Bruno (2002): Politics Versus Law in the EU’s Approach to Ethnic Minorities. EUI Working Papers. Vol. No 2000/4: RCS No 2000/4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Eva G. Heidbreder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Patricia Bauer Helmut Voelzkow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heidbreder, E.G. (2004). Die Kommission und die Kopenhagener Kriterien: Erweiterte Handlungskapazität jenseits des Beitritts. In: Bauer, P., Voelzkow, H. (eds) Die Europäische Union — Marionette oder Regisseur?. Forschungen zur Europäischen Integration, vol 10. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80647-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80647-5_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80647-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation