Zusammenfassung
Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags steht eine Analyse des Zusammenhanges von „Gutem Regieren“1, Wohlfahrtsentwicklung und medialer Kommunikation. Das Konzept „Good Governance“beschreibt ein verändertes Verständnis von Regieren, bei dem es nicht mehr um hierarchische, politische Steuerung sondern um eine Art gesamtgesellschaftliches Verantwortungsmanagement geht. Die Grundsätze von „Good Governance“sind Effektivität, Responsivi-tät, Demokratie und Transparenz. Effektivität bezieht sich auf die Leistungssteigerung des öffentlichen Sektors, insbesondere der Verwaltung. Respon-sivität umfasst die Verantwortlichkeit der Regierenden gegenüber den Regierten, also die Festlegung von Rechenschaftspflichten und öffentlichen Kontrollinstanzen. Demokratie beinhaltet nicht zuletzt die Verbesserung der rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und Partizipationschancen. Transparenz erfordert freien Zugang zu Informationen, gilt als Mittel zur Korruptionsbe-kämpfung und als Voraussetzung für die Akzeptanz politischer Entscheidungen2. Nach Überzeugung von Weltbank und Vereinten Nationen kann nur eine Gesellschaft, in der es „Good Governance“gibt, positive Entwicklungsleistungen im Sinne von Wohlfahrtsentwicklung vollbringen. Damit sind die Verringerung von Armut und Hunger, Fortschritte der Medizin und Gesundheitsversorgung, Erhöhung der Lebenserwartung, Steigerung landwirtschaftlicher Erträge und Alphabetisierung gemeint.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literaturverzeichnis
ACE Project: http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/me/mea01b.htm.
Almond, Gabriel A./Powell, G. Bingham Jr. (1992): Comparative Politics Today: A World View. NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Asante, Clement E. (1997): Press Freedom and Development: A Research Guide and Selected Bibliography. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
Bagdikian, Ben (1997): The Media Monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Besley, Timothy/Burgess, Robin (2001): Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media. In: European Economic Review, 45, S. 629–640.
Bogart, Leo (1995): Commercial Culture. The Media System and the Public Interest. New York: Transaction.
Dahlgren, Peter (1995): Television and the Public Sphere. London: Sage.
Dahlgren, Peter/Sparks, Colin (1995): Communication and Citizenship. London: Routledge.
Diamond, Larry (2001): Consolidating Democracies. In: LeDuc, Lawrence/Niemi, Richard G./Norris, Pippa (Hrsg.): Comparing Democracies 2: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. London: Sage.
Djankov, Simeon/McLiesh, Caralee/Nenova, Tatiana/Shleifer, Andrei (2001): ‚Who Owns the Media?‘ Paper presented at the World Bank meeting The Role of the Media in Development’. April.
Donohue, George A./Tichenor, Philip (1995): A Guard Dog Perspective on the Role of the Media. In: Journal of Communication, 45, 2, S. 115–128.
E+Z (2000). Die Entstehung des Governance-Konzepts bei Weltbank und UN. In: E+Z Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit, Nr. 10 (Oktober), S. 272–274.
E+Z (2001). Human Development Report 2001: Ohne Technologie keine Entwicklung. In: E+Z Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit, Nr. 9 (September), S. 275.
Freedom House (2000): Freedom in the World 2000–2001. www.freedomhouse.org.
Gunter, Richard/Mughan, Anthony (2000): Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hachten, William A. (1989): Media Development without Press Freedom — Lee Kuan Yew’s Singapore. In: Journalism Quarterly, 66, S. 822–827.
Human Rights Watch: http://www.hrw.org/.
Huntington, Samuel (1993): The Third Wave. Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma Press.
Hur, K. Kyloon (1984): A Critical Analysis of International News Flow Research. In: Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, S. 365–378.
Index on Censorship: http://www.indexoncensorship.org.
Inglehart, Louis Edward (1998): Press and Speech Freedoms in the World, from Antiquity until 1998: A Chronology. Westport, CT: Greenwoord Press.
International Federation of Journalists: http://www.ifj.org.
International Press Institute: http://www.freemedia.at.
Kalathil, Shanthi/Boas, Taylor C. (2001): The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba and the Counterrevolution. Global Policy Program No 21. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Kaufman, Daniel/Kraay, Aaart/Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo (1999): Governance Matters. World Bank Policy Research Paper 2196. Washington DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org.
Köcher, Renate (1986): Bloodhounds or Missionaries: Role Definitions of German and British Journalists. In: European Journal of Communication, 1, S. 43–64.
Lagos, Marta (2001): Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America. In: Journal of Democracy, 12, 1, S. 137–145.
Lerner, Daniel (1958): The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, Il: The Free Press.
Linz, Juan/Stephan, Alfred (1996): Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Washington DC: Johns Hopkins Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959): Some Social Prerequisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. In: American Political Science Review, 53, S. 69–105.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1990): Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of Canada and the United States. New York: Routledge.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1996): American Exceptionalism: A Double Edged Sword. New York: W.W.Norton;
Lupia, Arthur/McCubbins, Mathew D. (1998): The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McChesney, Robert (1999): Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana, Il: University of Illinois Press.
McCrone, Donald J./Cnudde, Charles F. (1967): Toward a Communication theory of Democratic Political Development: A Causal model. In: American Political Science Review, 61, S. 72–79.
McQuail, Denis (2000): Mass Communication Theory. 4th edition. London: Sage.
Mowlana, Hamid (1985): International Flow of Information: A Global Report and Analysis. Paris: UNESCO.
Norris, Pippa (Hrsg.) (1999): Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Go-vernnance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa (2000): A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa (2001): Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa (2002): Democratic Phoenix: Political Activism Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Østergaard, Bernt Stubbe (Hrsg.) (1992): The Media in Western Europe. London: Sage.
OSZE: Report by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe on the October 2000 parliamentary elections in Belarus. Available at http://www.osce.org/odihr/documents/reports/election_repots/by/bel200fin.pdf.
Pharr, Susan/Putnam, Robert (Hrsg.) (2000): Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Picard, Robert G. (1988): Press Concentration and Monopoly: New Perspectives on Newspaper Ownership and Operation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Plattner, Marc/Diamond, Larry (2001): High Anxiety in the Andes. In: Journal of Democracy, 12, 2 (Sonderheft), S. 5.
Preston, William/Herman, Edwards S./Schiller, Herbert I. (1989): Hope and Folly: The United States and UNESCO 1945–1985. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Przeworski, Adam/Teune, Henry (1970): The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. NY: Wiley-Interscience.
Pye, Lucian W. (1963): Communications and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rodan, Garry (1998): Asia and the International Press: The Political Significance of Expanding Markets. In: Democratization, 5, S. 125–54.
Sanchez-Tabernero, Alfonso (1993): Media Concentration in Europe: Commercial Enterprises and the Public Interest. London: John Libbey.
Sen, Amartya (1999): Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Shah, Hemant (1996): Modernization, Marginalization and Emancipation: Toward a Normative Model of Journalism and National Development. In: Communication Theory, 6, 2, S. 143–166.
Siebert, Fred S./Peterson, Theodore/Schramm, Wilbur (1984, zuerst 1956): Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Smith, Anthony (1991): The Age of Behemoths: The Globalization of Mass Media Firms. New York: Priority Press.
Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle et al. (1984): Foreign News in the Media: International Reporting in Twenty-Nine Countries. Reports and Papers on Mass Communication, 93. Paris: UNESCO.
Stevenson, Robert L./Shaw, Donald Lewis (Hrsg.) (1984): Foreign News and the New World Information Order Ames. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Sussman, Leonard R. (2000): Censor Dot Gov: The Internet and Press Freedom. In: Press Freedom Survey 2000. Washington DC: Freedom House. http://www.freedomhouse.com.
Sussman, Leonard R. (2001): Press Freedom in Our Genes. Reston, VA: World Press Freedom Committee.
Swanson, David L./Mancini, Paolo (Hrsg.) (1996): Politics, Media and Modern Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Tunstall, Jeremy/Palmer, Michael (1991): Media Moguls. London: Routledge.
Wolfenson, James D. (1999): Voices of the Poor. In: Washington Post, 10, November 1999, A39.
World Press Freedom Council: www.wpfc.org.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Westdeutscher Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norris, P. (2003). Globale politische Kommunikation: Freie Medien, Gutes Regieren und Wohlstandsentwicklung. In: Esser, F., Pfetsch, B. (eds) Politische Kommunikation im internationalen Vergleich. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80392-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80392-4_6
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13625-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80392-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive