Abstract
With national initiatives for standardization and accountability, science education has been substantially impacted. In some areas, science instruction has been reduced or even eliminated due to the prioritization of math and language arts. In other areas, the science curriculum has been narrowed and paced in such a rigid way that alternative methods for instruction, scientific discourse, and criticality in science thinking have been precluded or marginalized. In spite of well-intentioned STEM programs, a high value has been placed on science content memorization, and a considerable resistance to divergent, child-centered practices in science instruction has been encountered at the P-12 level, as well as teacher education courses at the university level. This chapter explores the experiences of a former elementary teacher and current university professor in his journey to promote social justice, criticality, and child-centered practices in science education in both the elementary and university settings. Multiple barriers to divergent scientific inquiry are discussed through the elementary and university perspectives, and include: national initiatives, standards, narrow curricula, school culture, accreditation directives and the traditional, positivistic mindsets of many teachers, administrators, and parents. Additionally, pathways for creating spaces for discourse, making connections, and challenging the status quo in science education are discussed. Resistance from teachers and professors is explored through the author’s research in authentic scientific inquiry in the elementary school.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloom, J. (2006). Creating a classroom community of young scientists. New York: Routledge.
Bochner, A. P. (1994). Perspectives on inquiry II: Theories and stories. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 21–41). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Canestrari, A., & Marlowe, B. (2005). From silence to dissent: Fostering critical voice in teachers. Encounters, 18(4), 41–46.
Coughlin, P. A., Hansen, K. A., Heller, D., Kaufman, R. E., Stolberg, J. R., & Walsh, K. B. (2000). Creating child-centered classrooms. Washington, DC: Children’s Resources International.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). Linda Darling-Hammond’s fiery commencement address. Retrieved from http://blog.nationalequityproject.org/2011/05/25/linda-darling-hammonds-fiery-commencement-address/
Demir, A., Schmidt, F., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Science from the pond up: Using measurement to introduce inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39, 23–27.
Du Quesnay, H. (2003). Teachers and leaders – NCSL’s part in developing the teaching profession. Education Review, 16(2), 49–54.
Einstein, A. (n.d.). Education quotes. Retrieved from http://www.froebelweb.org/web7011.html
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1).
Essex, M. (1952). What does academic freedom mean for elementary and secondary teachers? Educational Leadership, 9(4), 237–242.
French, D. P. (2005). Is academic freedom a threat to teaching introductory science? Journal of College Science Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=51143
Haigh, M. (1998). Investigative practical work in year 12 biology programmes. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton.
Kohn, A. (1993). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappan. Retrieved from http://www.alfiekohn.org/article/choices-children/
Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42, 109–113.
Legates, D. R. (2016). The university vs. academic freedom. National Association of Scholars. Retrieved from https://www.nas.org/articles/the_university_vs._academic_freedom
Lutzker, P. (2007). Teaching as an art. Humanising Language Teaching, 1. Retrieved from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/jan07/mart05.htm
Michael, T. (2012). In diversity there is beauty and there is strength. Retrieved from http://someonetotellitto.org/in-diversity-there-is-beauty-and-there-is-strength/
Moyer, R. H., Hackett, J. K., & Everett, S. A. (2007). Teaching science as investigations: Modeling inquiry through learning cycle lessons. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). Terraforming Mars. Retrieved from http://quest.nasa.gov/mars/background/terra.html
National Science Teachers Association. (2010). NSTA position statement: Principles of professionalism for science educators. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/professionalism.aspx.
Pecorino, P.A. (2013). Academic freedom and CUNY: Insulty to injury via pathways. Proceedings from AAUP conference. Queensborough Community College, CUNY. Retrieved from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/PRESENTATIONS/AAUP-Conf-2013-Pathways-AF.html
Peters, J. M., & Stout, D. L. (2006). Science in elementary education: Methods, concepts, and inquiries (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Pinnegar, S., & Erickson, L. (2010). Teacher-centered curriculum. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Reichman, H. (2015). Does academic freedom have a future? Academe, 101(6), 1–6.
Robinson, K. (2013). How to escape education’s death valley. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley.
Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44, 395–411.
Stone, B. (2014). Influence of teacher-directed scientific inquiry on students’ primal inquiries in two science classrooms. Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (AAT 3682808).
Taylor, P. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 151–173.
Vinson, K. D., Gibson, R., & Ross, E.W. (2001). High-stakes testing and standardization: The threat to authenticity. John Dewey Project on Progressive Education, 3(2).
Wallace, T., & Brand, B. R. (2012). Using critical race theory to analyze science teachers culturally responsive practices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 341–374.
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23, 383–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stone, B. (2019). Resistance to Divergent, Child-Centered Scientific Inquiry in the Elementary School and at the University: An Autoethnography of a Science Educator. In: Bazzul, J., Siry, C. (eds) Critical Voices in Science Education Research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99990-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99990-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99989-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99990-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)