Advertisement

Automated Reasoning in the Age of the Internet

  • Alan BundyEmail author
  • Kwabena Nuamah
  • Christopher Lucas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11110)

Abstract

The internet hosts a vast store of information that we cannot and should not ignore. It’s not enough just to retrieve facts. To make full use of the internet we must also infer new information from old. This is an exciting new opportunity for automated reasoning, but it also presents new kinds of research challenge.

  • There are a huge number of potential axioms from which to infer new theorems. Methods of choosing appropriate axioms are needed.

  • Information is stored on the Internet in diverse forms, e.g., graph and relational databases, JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), CSV (Comma-Separated Values) files, and many others. Some contain errors and others are incomplete: lacking vital contextual details such as time and units of measurements.

  • Information retrieved from the Internet must be automatically curated into a common format before we can apply inference to it. Such a representation must be flexible enough to represent a wide diversity of knowledge formats, as well as supporting the diverse kinds of inference we propose.

  • We can employ forms of inference that are novel in automated reasoning, such as using regression to form new functions from sets of number pairs, and then extrapolation to predict new pairs.

  • Information is of mixed quality and accuracy, so introduces uncertainty into the theorems inferred. Some inference operations, such as regression, also introduce uncertainty. Uncertainty estimates need to be inherited during inference and reported to users in an intelligible form.

We will report on the FRANK (Formally know as RIF: Rich Inference Framework. We changed the name as the RIF acronym is already in use, standing for Requirements Interchange Format.) system that explores this new research direction.

Keywords

Query answering Prediction Automated reasoning World Wide Web 

References

  1. 1.
    Bundy, A., Sasnauskas, G., Chan, M.: Solving guesstimation problems using the semantic web: four lessons from an application. Semant. Web, 1–14, 10 October 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clifford, A.A.: Multivariate Error Analysis: A Handbook of Error Propagation and Calculation in Many-Parameter Systems. Applied Science Publishers, London (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrucci, D., et al.: Building Watson: an overview of the DeepQA project. AI Mag. 31(3), 59–79 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green, C.C., Raphael, B.: The use of theorem-proving techniques in question-answering systems. In: Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, pp. 169–181. ACM (1968)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Honnibal, M., Johnson, M.: An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1373–1378. Association for Computational Linguistics, Lisbon, September 2015. https://aclweb.org/anthology/D/D15/D15-1162
  6. 6.
    Liu, H., Singh, P.: ConceptNet - a practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit. BT Technol. J. 22(4), 211–226 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nuamah, K., Bundy, A.: Calculating error bars on inferences from web data. In: Intelligent Systems Conference. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nuamah, K., Bundy, A., Lucas, C.: Functional inferences over heterogeneous data. In: Ortiz, M., Schlobach, S. (eds.) RR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9898, pp. 159–166. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45276-0_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singhal, A.: Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings. Official Google Blog, May 2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vatant, B., Wick, M.: Geonames ontology (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations