A Rule-Based eCommerce Methodology for the IoT Using Trustworthy Intelligent Agents and Microservices

  • Kalliopi KravariEmail author
  • Nick Bassiliades
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11092)


The impact of the Internet of Things will transform business and economy. This network of intercommunicating heterogeneous Things is expected to affect the commerce industry by driving innovation and new opportunities in the future. Yet, this open, distributed and heterogeneous environment raises challenges. Old eCommerce practices cannot be sufficiently applied while trustworthiness issues arise. This study proposes a rule-based eCommerce methodology that will allow Things to safely trade on the network. The proposed methodology represents Things as Intelligent Agents since they form an alternative to traditional interactions among people and objects while they are involved in a rich research effort regarding trust management. It also combines Intelligent Agents with the microservice architecture in order to deal with Things heterogeneity while it adopts the use of a social agent-based trust model. Well-known semantic technologies such as RuleML and defeasible logic is adopted in order to maximize interoperability. Furthermore, in order to deal with issues related to rule exchange with no common syntax, the methodology is integrated to a multi-agent knowledge-based framework. Finally, an eCommerce scenario is presented, illustrating the viability of the approach.


Multi-agent systems Defeasible reasoning Trustworthiness 



The Postdoctoral Research was implemented through an IKY scholarship funded by the “Strengthening Post-Academic Researchers /Researchers” Act from the resources of the OP “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” priority axis 6,8,9 and co-funded by The European Social Fund - the ESF and the Greek government.


  1. 1.
    Garriga, M.: Towards a taxonomy of microservices architectures. In: Cerone, A., Roveri, M. (eds.) SEFM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10729, pp. 203–218. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hang, C., Singh, M.P.: Trust-based recommendation based on graph similarity. In: AAMAS Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies (Trust), pp. 71–81 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harwood, T., Garry, T.: Internet of Things: understanding trust in techno-service systems. J. Serv. Manage. 28(3), 442–475 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G.: Visualizing semantic web proofs of defeasible logic in the DR-DEVICE system. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(3), 406–419 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kravari, K., Bassiliades, N.: Social principles in agent-based trust management for the Internet of Things. In: 14th Workshop on Agents for Complex Systems of 19th SYNASC (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N.: EMERALD: a multi-agent system for knowledge-based reasoning interoperability in the semantic web. In: Konstantopoulos, S., Perantonis, S., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D., Vouros, G. (eds.) SETN 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6040, pp. 173–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, I., Lee, K.: The Internet of Things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 58(4), 431–440 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silva, G.C., de Souza Gimenes, I.M., Fantinato, M., de Toledo, B.F.: Towards a process for negotiation of E-contracts involving web services. SBSI 2012, 267–278 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations