Abstract
A plotted spatial distribution of a variable is an interesting type of statistical output favored by many users. Examples include the spatial distribution of people that make use of child care, of the amount of electricity used by businesses or of the exhaust of certain gasses by industry. However, a spatial distribution plot may be exploited to link information to a single unit of interest. Traditional disclosure control methods and disclosure risk measures can not readily be applied to this type of maps. In previous papers [5, 6] we discussed plotting the distribution of a dichotomous variable on a cartographic map. In the present paper we focus on plotting a continuous variable and derive a suitable risk measure, that not only detects unsafe areas, but also contains a recipe to repair them. We apply the risk measure to the spatial distribution of the energy consumption of enterprises to test and describe its properties.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy of Statistics Netherlands.
The authors like to thank Rob van de Laar and Anne Miek Kremer for reviewing an earlier version of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chainey, S., Reid, S., Stuart, N.: When is a hotspot a hotspot? A procedure for creating statistically robust hotspot maps of crime. In: Kidner, D., Higgs, G., White, S. (eds.) Innovations in GIS 9: Socio-Economic Applications of Geographic Information Science, pp. 21–36. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon (2002)
Danese, M., Lazzari, M., Murgante, B.: Kernel density estimation methods for a geostatistical approach in seismic risk analysis: the case study of Potenza Hilltop Town (Southern Italy). In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Laganà , A., Taniar, D., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds.) ICCSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5072, pp. 415–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_31
Duncan, G.T., Stokes, S.L.: Disclosure risk vs. data utility: the RU confidentiality map as applied to topcoding. Chance 17(3), 16–20 (2004)
Hundepool, A., et al.: Statistical Disclosure Control. Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. Wiley, Hoboken (2012). ISBN 978-1-119-97815-2
de Jonge, E., de Wolf, P.-P.: Spatial smoothing and statistical disclosure control. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Pejić-Bach, M. (eds.) PSD 2016. LNCS, vol. 9867, pp. 107–117. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45381-1_9
de Wolf, P.P., de Jonge, E.: Location related risk and utility. Presented at UNECE/Eurostat Worksession Statistical Data Confidentiality, 20–22 September, Skopje (2017). https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.46/2017/3_LocationRiskUtility.pdf
Worton, B.J.: Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70(1), 164–168 (1989)
Zhou, Y., Dominici, F., Louis, T.A.: A smoothing approach for masking spatial data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 4(3), 1451–1475 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS325
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Wolf, PP., de Jonge, E. (2018). Safely Plotting Continuous Variables on a Map. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Montes, F. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99771-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99771-1_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99770-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99771-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)