Advertisement

Mobility as a Service—Stakeholders’ Challenges and Potential Implications

  • Juho KostiainenEmail author
  • Anu Tuominen
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

The transport sector is going through major changes. Global challenges and megatrends such as climate change, urbanization, safety and security concerns, and servitization are driving transport system developments towards sustainability and user-centricity. Over the past few years, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) has become a common term for the idea of providing the end user a one-stop shop for discovering, accessing and paying for a wide variety of transport options with varying pricing models. While multimodal information and local ticketing integrations are common, scalable comprehensive solutions are still lacking. This paper identifies key challenges for different stakeholders and their potential implications on the way towards integrated and inclusive sustainable servitization of mobility.

Keywords

Mobility as a service MaaS Challenges Implications Combined mobility services Integrated mobility services 

References

  1. ABI Research (2016) ABI research forecasts global Mobility as a Service revenues to exceed $1 trillion by 2030Google Scholar
  2. Aretun Å (2014) Developments in driver’s license holding among young people. Potential explanations, implications and trends Linköping: VTI rapport 824AGoogle Scholar
  3. Autonews (2015) Automakers spot a profit opportunity in mobility services: Daimler, others test new business models in an evolving market. Automotive News article, March 9, 2015. Available at http://www.autonews.com/article/20150309/OEM/303099959/automakers-spot-a-profit-opportunity-in-mobility-services. Accessed 5 Nov 2017
  4. Babar Y, Burtch G (2017) Examining the impact of ridehailing services on public transit use. September 25, 2017Google Scholar
  5. Carse A (2011) Assessment of transport quality of life as an alternative transport appraisal technique. J Transp Geogr 19(2011):1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CG Insights (2017) Big auto’s startup bets: where they’re investing across ride-hailing, AI, and mapping. September 15, 2016. Available at https://www.cbinsights.com/research/auto-corporates-investing-startups/. Accessed 5 Nov 2017
  7. Chalkia et al (2017) D4.1—Report on challenges for implementing future transport scenarios. Mobility4EU-project: action plan for the future mobility in Europe. Horizon 2020—Coordination and Support Action. Draft report, July 2017Google Scholar
  8. Cleclow RR, Gouri SM (2017) Disruptive transportation: the adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Institute of Transportation Services, UC Davis, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-17-07Google Scholar
  9. Dweller in Agice Cities project funded by the Academy of Finland, Strategic Research Council (2018) www.agilecities.fi/en/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  10. European Commission (2017) Statistical pocketbook 2017. 2.1 Transport. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/pocketbook-2017_en
  11. European Commission (2016) A European strategy for low-emission mobility. COM (2016) 501 final. Brussels, 20.7.2016Google Scholar
  12. Finnish Transport Agency (2015) MaaS services and business opportunities. Research reports of the Finnish Transport Agency 56/2015Google Scholar
  13. Goldman Sachs (2017) Rethinking mobility. Equity Research, May 23, 2017. https://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/Rethinking%20Mobility_GoldmanSachsMay2017.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018
  14. Grosse-Ophoff A, Hausler S, Heineke K, Möller T (2017) How shared mobility will change the automotive industry. McKinsey & Company article, April 2017. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/how-shared-mobility-will-change-the-automotive-industry. Accessed 5 Nov 2017
  15. Heikkilä S (2014) Mobility as a Service—a proposal for action for the public administration, case Helsinki. Master’s thesis, Aalto University School of EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  16. Hietanen S (2014) ‘Mobility as a Service’—the new transport model? Euro-transport 12(2):26–28Google Scholar
  17. Holmberg P-E, Collado M, Sarasini S, Williander M (2016) Mobility as a Service-MaaS: Describing the framework. Final report MaaS framework, Viktoria Swedish ICTGoogle Scholar
  18. Jittrapirom P, Caiati V, Feneri A-M, Ebrahimigharehbaghi S, Alonso-González MJ, Narayan J (2017) Mobility as a Service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plann 2(2):13–25Google Scholar
  19. Kamargianni M, Weibo L, Matyas M, Schäfer A (2016) A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp Res Procedia 14:3294–3303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamargianni M, Matyas M, Li W, Schäfer A (2015) Feasibility Study for “Mobility as a Service” concept in London. Report—UCL Energy Institute and Department for TransportGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeney T (2017) ARK invest white paper. Mobility-as-a-service: why self-driving cars could change everything. Available at https://ark-invest.com/research/self-driving-cars. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
  22. Kuhnimhof T, Armoogum J, Buehler R, Dargay J, Denstadli J-M, Yamamoto T (2012) Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults—evidence from six industrialized countries. Transp Rev: Transnational Transdisciplinary J 32(6):761–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lund E, Kerttu J, Koglin T (2017) Drivers and barriers for integrated mobility services: a review of research. K2 Working Papers 2017:3. Available at www.k2centrum.se/sites/default/files/drivers_and_barriers_for_integrated_mobility_services_k2_working_paper_2017_3.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  24. L’Hostis A (ed), Müller B, Meyer G, Brückner A, Foldesi E, Dablanc L, Blanquart C, Tuominen A, Kostiainen J, Pou C, Urban M, Keseru I, Coosemans T, de la Cruz MT, Val S, Golfetti A, Napoletano L, Skoogberg J, Holley-Moore G, Chalkia E, van der Werf I, Bos F, Grosso S, Stans Y, Langheim J (2016) Societal needs and requirements for future transportation and mobility as well as opportunities and challenges of current solutions. European Comission; Mobility4EU project (2016), Deliverable: D2.1, p 85Google Scholar
  25. MAASiFiE (2016) Mobility as a Service for linking Europe (MAASiFiE) project. http://www.vtt.fi/sites/maasifie/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  26. MOBiNET (2018) European Commission FP7 project. www.mobinet.eu/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  27. Marketsandmarkets (2017) Ride hailing market by service type. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/mobility-on-demand-market-198699113.html
  28. McKinsey & Company (2017) The automotive revolution is speeding up: Perspectives on the emerging personal mobility landscape. McKinsey & Company, October 2017Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Finland (2018) National growth programme for the transport sector 2018–2022. Available at http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-317-7. Accessed 14 May 2018
  30. Ministry of Transport and Communications (2017) Act on transport services. www.lvm.fi/lvm-site62-mahti-portlet/download?did=246709. Accessed 1 Nov 2017
  31. Mobility4EU (2018) European Commission’s H2020 project. www.mobility4eu.eu/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  32. Örn M (2017) Taltio-hankkeen loppuraportti [Taltio project final report, in Finnish]. 31.10.2017. Available at: https://taltio.net/sites/default/files/taltio-hankkeen_loppuraportti_yleinen_31.10.2017.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018
  33. Polis (2017) Mobility as a Service: implications for urban and regional transport. Discussion paper offering the perspective of Polis member cities and regions on Mobility as a Service (MaaS). 4 September 2017Google Scholar
  34. PwC (2017) Strategy & Digital Auto Report. PwC Strategy&, September 2017. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/2017-Strategyand-Digital-Auto-Report.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018
  35. Rayle L, Dai D, Chan N, Cervero R, Shaheen S (2016) Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy 45:168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Röhrleef M (2017) Hanover’s ‘one stop mobility shop’. Intelligent Transport, vol. 1, Issue 1., In-Depth Focus on Mobility-as-a-Service. Available at https://www.intelligenttransport.com/digital/it-issue1-2017-MaaS-idf/. Accessed 23 Nov 2017
  37. Sadowsky N, Nelson E (2017) The impact of ride-hailing services on public transportation use: a discontinuity regression analysis. Economics Department Working Paper Series. 13Google Scholar
  38. Transit app (2018) https://transitapp.com/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  39. Transport Systems Catapult (2016) Mobility as a Service: exploring the opportunity for Mobility as a Service in the UK. July 2016Google Scholar
  40. Tuominen A, Auvinen H, Aittoniemi E (2016) Esiselvitys liikenteen uusien palveluiden ympäristövaikutuksista ja niiden arvioinnista. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä: 28/2016. Liikennevirasto, Helsinki, 36s [Preliminary report on the environmental impacts and the impact assessment of new transport services]Google Scholar
  41. UITP (2011) Becoming a real mobility provider. Combined Mobility: public transport in synergy with other modes like car-sharing, taxi and cycling. UITP position paper, April 2011Google Scholar
  42. Urbi app (2018) https://www.urbi.co/en/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  43. VAMOS!—Value Added Mobility Services, project funded by the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (2018) www.vamosapi.com/. Accessed 14 May 2018
  44. Whim app (2018) https://whimapp.com/. Accessed 14 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.EspooFinland

Personalised recommendations