Skip to main content

Industry and the Development of a New System of Higher Technological Education in the UK 1955–1965: A Shared Responsibility?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Engineering-Business Nexus

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 32))

  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

There is a continuing conflict between education and industry that begins with the different perceptions that educators and industrialists have of the purposes of tertiary education through to university study. For example at the present time there is a pressure from industry on the higher education sector to prepare new graduates immediately for work. In so doing industry places the responsibility for education and training on the institutions of higher education and through their fees on the students for their education and training. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the extent to which responsibility was shared between the colleges and industry when England and Wales had a national system of higher technological education and training based on the sandwich principle in the 1950s and 1960s, and to show that industrialists working with educationalists are capable of producing innovatory curricula. Harold Silver the Historian of the Council for National Academic Awards 1964–1989 (A Higher Education (1990) London, Falmer) reports that of the thesis and dissertation literature for the earlier period, that is the period too which this chapter relates there were only two that were relevant, one of which was the authors (p 279). Such research as there was is documented in Heywood, J. and R. Ann Abel (1964) Technical Education and Training in the United Kingdom. Research in Progress 1962–1964. Slough. The National Foundation for Educational Research). If engineering education is to progress practitioners in both academia and industry will require an understanding of the substantial knowledge base that has been developed, which implies some kind of training. Only in this way will they learn to share responsibility at the operational and executive levels of curriculum delivery and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An electronic version of the report is available from the author.

  2. 2.

    The Vice-Chancellor distilled this report into a four page document in which he proposed that the university create an engineering department to offer such a curriculum. Senate rejected the document wanting a more traditional approach. Subsequently the Vice-Chancellor wrote another proposal that resulted in the founding of a department of engineering. The person appointed to the chair was an engineering designer from Cambridge University. The university does not have a copy of the first document but has retained a copy of the second.

References

  • Barlow. (1946). Scientific manpower. Report of a Committee appointed by the Lord President of the Council.Cmd 6824. London, HMSO. The Barlow Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, H. (1920). Engineering and civilisation. 6th Graham Clark Lecture. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 6. 205 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandin, B. (2011). The competence of an engineer and how it is built through an apprenticeship program: A tentative model. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, G. S. (1963). Towards creative activity in engineering. Universities Quarterly, 17, 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, G. S. (1966). The education and training requirements for the electrical and mechanical manufacturing industries committee on manpower resources for science and technology. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrove, S. (1958). Technical education and social change. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUSEC. (1961). Report on education and training of professional engineers (Vol. 1). London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feilden, G. B. R. (1963). Engineering design. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. J., & Rennie, D. M. (1999). Development of an authentic assessment scheme for the professional placement period of a sandwich course. In J. Heywood, J. M. Sharp, & M. Hides (Eds.), Improving teaching in higher education. Salford: University of Salford teaching and learning Qualkity Improvement scheme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, L. (1955). Final report on the evaluation of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, C., Mash, V., & Heywood, J. (1968). Student reaction to sandwich courses for the Diploma in Technology (Dip.Tech). Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering Education, 7, 253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (1969). An evaluation of certain post-war developments in higher education. Thesis. Lancaster, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (1970). Qualities and their assessment in the education of technologists. International Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering Education, 9, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education. Research and development in curriculum and instruction. Hoboken: NJ IEEE/Wiley Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (2011). Higher technological education in England and Wales between 1955 and 1966. The contribution of the British electrical engineering industry. Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Ac 2011-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (2014). Higher technological education and British policy making: A lost opportunity for curriculum change. Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Paper 8689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (2016). More by luck than good judgement: Moral purpose in engineering education policy making for change (pp. 1–6). ASEE/IEEE Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757552.

  • Heywood, J., Lee, L. S., Monk, J. D., Moon, J., Rowley, B. G. H., Turner, B. T., & Vogler, J. (1966). The education of professional engineers for design and manufacture (a model curriculum). Lancaster Studies in Higher Education, 1, 2–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. P., & Gerstl, J. E. (1964). Engineering education and careers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 178, Part 3F Proceedings of a symposium on education and careers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1963). The education of technologists. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • JEE. (1964). Journal of Engineering Education, 54, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R. F. (2009). How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(3), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1964). The experience of higher education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE. (1945). Higher technological education, The Percy Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE. (1956). Technical education (1956), Whitepaper. Cmnd 9703. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE. (1959). Report of the central advisory council for education, Crowther Report (pp. 15–18). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE. (1961). Better opportunities in technical education, White paper. Cmnd 1524. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, J. D., & Heywood, J. (1977). The education and career patterns of professional mechanical engineers in design and manufacture. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 29(72), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. L. (1960). Britain’s scientific and technological manpower. Stanford: Stanford University Press jointly with Oxford U.P in the UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. B. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, W. A. (1964). Teaching design to sandwich courses students. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 179(1), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, R. T. (1990). Assessment of student performance during industrial training. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1(20), 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. (1965). A survey of the industrial work period of students of the diploma in technology at a college of advanced technology. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 17, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work. An interpretive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skellon, J. H. (1959). Planning of the industrial training period. Journal of the Royal Institute of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/519598300202.

  • Torbert, W. R. (1987). Managing the corporate dream. Homewood: Dow-Jones Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan. (2010). Restructuring engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. (2014). The making of an expert engineer. London: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter is a development of two papers published by the author at the 2011 and 2014 annual conferences of the American Society for Engineering Education (Heywood 2011, 2014). I thank the Society for permission to reprint extracts from these papers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heywood, J. (2019). Industry and the Development of a New System of Higher Technological Education in the UK 1955–1965: A Shared Responsibility?. In: Christensen, S.H., Delahousse, B., Didier, C., Meganck, M., Murphy, M. (eds) The Engineering-Business Nexus. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99635-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99636-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics