Advertisement

Experimental Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Reformer Prototype Model Produced by FDM and SLA 3D Printing Technology

  • Aleksa MilovanovićEmail author
  • Miloš Milošević
  • Goran Mladenović
  • Blaž Likozar
  • Katarina Čolić
  • Nenad Mitrović
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 54)

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of FDM and SLA 3D printing technologies in comparison with developed reformer polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell CAD model. 3D printing technologies allow a bottom-up approach to manufacturing, by depositing material in layers to final shape. Dimensional inaccuracy is still a problem in 3D printing technologies due to material shrinking and residual stress. Materials used in this research are PLA (Polylactic Acid) for FDM technology and the standard white resin material for SLA technology. Both materials are commonly used for 3D printing. PLA material is printed in three different height resolutions: 0.3 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.1 mm. White resin is printed in 0.1 mm height resolution. The aim of this paper is to show how layer height affects the dimensional accuracy of FDM models and to compare the dimensional accuracy of FDM and SLA printed reformer models with the same height resolution.

Keywords

Reformer 3D printing FDM SLA CAD model 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is carried out under the NATO SPS Project EAP.SFPP 984738, and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia projects TR35040, TR35006 and III 43007.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM F2792-12a: Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/f2792-12a
  2. 2.
    Shah, P., Racasan, R., Bills, P.: Comparison of different additive manufacturing methods using computed tomography. Case Stud. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yankov, E., Nikolova, M.P.: Comparison of the accuracy of 3D printed prototypes using the stereolithography (SLA) method with the digital CAD models. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 137, p. 02014 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713702014
  4. 4.
    Sljivic, M., Pavlovic, A., Ilic, J., Stanojevic, M., Todorovic, S.: Comparing the accuracy of professional and consumer grade 3D printers in complex models production. FME Trans. 45, 348–353 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1703348SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lotric, A., Sekavcnik, M., Pohar, A., Likozar, B., Hocevar, S.: Conceptual design of an integrated thermally self-sustained methanol steam reformer: high-temperature PEM fuel cell stack manportable power generator. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 16700–16713 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fahad, M., Hopkinson, N.: A new Benchmarking part for evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of additive manufacturing (AM) processes. In: Proceedings of the ICMPAE 2012 – 2nd International Conference on Mechanical, Production and Automobile Engineering (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cicek, Y., Altinkaynak, A., Balta, E.: Numerical and experimental analysis of infill rate on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling polylactic acid parts. In: Proceedings of the SPE ANTEC® Anaheim (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alafaghani, A., Qattawi, A., Alrawi, B., Guzman, A.: Experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: a design-for-manufacturing approach. In: Proceedings of the NAMRC 45 – 45th SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibrahim, M., Hafsa, M.N.: Dimensional accuracy of additive manufacturing model with different internal structure for investment casting implementation. In: International Integrated Engineering Summit (IIES 2014), 1–4 December 2014. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCoy, C., Farbman, D.: Materials testing of 3D printed ABS and PLA samples to guide mechanical design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milosevic, M., Miletic, V., Mitrovic, N., Manojlovic, D., Savic-Stankovic, T., Maneski, T.: Measurement of local deformation fields in dental composites using 3D optical system. Chemicke Listy 105, 751–753 (2011). ISSN: 0009-2770Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miletic, V., Manojlovic, D., Milosevic, M., Mitrovic, N., Savic, Stankovic T., Maneski, T.: Analysis of local shrinkage patterns of self-adhering and flowable composites using 3D digital image correlation. Quintessence Int. 42(9), 797–804 (2011). ISSN (print) 0033-6572; ISSN (online) 1936-7163 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manojlovic, D., Dramicanin, M.D., Milosevic, M., Zekovic, I., Cvijovic-Alagic, I., Mitrovic, N., Miletic, V.: Effects of a low-shrinkage methacrylate monomer and monoacylphosphine oxide photoinitiator on curing efficiency and mechanical properties of experimental resin-based composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 58, 487–494 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lezaja, M., Veljovic, Ð., Manojlovic, D., Milosevic, M., Mitrovic, N., Janackovic, Ð., Miletic, V.: Bond strength of restorative materials to hydroxyapatite inserts and dimensional changes of insert-containing restoration during polymerization. Dental Mater. 31(2), 171–181 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Queral, V., Rincon, E., Mirones, V., Rios, L., Cabrera, S.: Dimensional accuracy of additively manufactured structures for modular coil windings of stellarators. Fus. Eng. Des. 124, 173–178 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogden, K.M., Aslan, C., Ordway, N., Diallo, D.: Factors affecting dimensional accuracy of 3-D printed anatomical structures derived from CT data. J. Digit. Imaging 28(6), 654–663 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9803-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Milosevic, M., Mladenovic, G., Sedmak, A., Plohar, A., Likozar, B.: Design and manufacture of reformer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Struct. Integr. Life 17(1), 21–24 (2017). ISSN: 1451-3749Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sedmak, A., Milosevic, M., Mitrovic, N., Petrovic, A., Maneski, T.: Digital image correlation in experimental mechanical analysis. Struct. Integr. Life 12(1), 39–42 (2012). ISSN: 1451-3749Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miletic, V., Peric, D., Milosevic, M., Manojlovic, D., Mitrovic, N.: Local deformation fields and marginal integrity of sculptable bulk-fill, low-shrinkage and conventional composites. Dental Mater. 32(11), 1441–1451 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colic, K., Sedmak, A., Legweel, K., Milosevic, M., Mitrovic, N., Miskovic, Z., Hloch, S.: Experimental and numerical research of mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy hip implant. Tech. Gaz. 24(3), 709–713 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20160219132016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tatic, U., Colic, K., Sedmak, A., Miskovic, Z., Petrovic, A.: Evaluation of the locking compression plates stress-strain fields. Tech. Gaz. 25(1), 112–117 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20170420121538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksa Milovanović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miloš Milošević
    • 1
  • Goran Mladenović
    • 2
  • Blaž Likozar
    • 3
  • Katarina Čolić
    • 1
  • Nenad Mitrović
    • 2
  1. 1.Innovation Centre of the Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Department of Catalysis and Chemical Reaction EngineeringNational Institute of ChemistryLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations