Advertisement

PHR, We’ve Had a Problem Here

  • Minna M. RantanenEmail author
  • Jani KoskinenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 537)

Abstract

Personal health records (PHRs) have been a global trend in recent decade. It has been seen as a concept and tool that could help patients maintaining health, improving their well-being, and supporting communication with healthcare professional etc. Despite the great amount of research about PHR there is no consensus what a PHR actually means in academic literature or other arenas. There are multiple terms in use and multiple definitions which set challenges for rational discourse between citizens/patient, healthcare providers, system developers and policy makers. Especially, when citizens—as key stakeholder—should also be able to understand what those systems are we need clear and understandable definition for PHR’s. In the paper, we conduct a brief survey for different definitions and show the problems that arise with the incoherent use of the term “PHR”.

Keywords

Personal health record PHR Definition Rational discourse Quasi-rational discourse 

References

  1. 1.
    Rantanen, M., Heimo, O.I.: Problem in patient information system acquirement in Finland: translation and terminology. In: Kimppa, K., Whitehouse, D., Kuusela, T., Phahlamohlaka, J. (eds.) HCC 2014. IAICT, vol. 431, pp. 362–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44208-1_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hersh, W.: A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9(1), 24 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garets, D., Davies, M.: Electronic patient records EMRs and EHRs concepts as different as apples and oranges at least deserve separate names. Healthcare Informatics online, October 2005Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., Jadad, A.: What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J. Med. Internet Res. 7(1), e1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., Nykänen, P.: Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inf. 77(5), 291–304 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tang, P.C., Ash, J.S., Bates, D.W., Overhage, J.M., Sands, D.Z.: Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(2), 121–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaelber, D.C., Jha, A.K., Johnston, D., Middleton, B., Bates, D.W.: A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(6), 729–736 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reti, S.R., Feldman, H.J., Safran, C.: Governance for personal health records. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(1), 14–17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson, M.J., Reilly, J.D., Valdez, R.S.: Work system barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver use of personal health records: a systematic review. Appl. Ergon. 54, 218–242 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coiera, E.: Guide to Health Informatics, 2nd edn. Hodder Arnold, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habermas, J.: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Habermas, J.: The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article. Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, pp. 102–107 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, J., Jung, H., Bates, D.W.: History and trends of “personal health record” research in pubmed. Healthc. Inform. Res. 17(1), 3–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lahtiranta, J., Koskinen, J.S.S., Knaapi-Junnila, S., Nurminen, M.: Sensemaking in the personal health space. Inf. Technol. People 28(4), 790–805 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, G., Joong, Y.P., Soo-Yong, S., Jong, S.H., Hyeon, J.R., Jae, H.L., Bates, D.W.: Which users should be the focus of mobile personal health records? Analysis of user characteristics influencing usage of a tethered mobile personal health record. Telemedicine e-Health 22, 419–428 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis, S., Roudsari, A., Raworth, R., Courtney, K.L., MacKay, L.: Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(4), 857–866 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antonovsky, A.: The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot. Int. 11(1), 11–18 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lahtiranta, J.: Current challenges of personal health information management. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 11(3), 230–243 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., Ray, P.: Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of mHealth. Inf. Manag. 50(4), 181–195 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Demiris, G.: New era for the consumer health informatics research agenda. Health Syst. 1(1), 13–16 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piras, E.M., Zanutto, A.: “One day it will be you who tells us doctors what to do!”. Exploring the “personal” of PHR in pediatric diabetes management. Inf. Technol. People 27(4), 421–439 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Caligtan, C.A., Dykes, P.C.: Electronic health records and personal health records. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 27(3), 218–228 (2011). Patient-Centered Technologies: Enhancing Communication and Self-Care for Patients and CaregiversCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holopainen, A.: Mobiiliteknologia ja terveyssovellukset, mitä ne ovat? Duodecim 131(13), 1285–1290 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Househ, M.S., Borycki, E.M., Rohrer, W.M., Kushniruk, A.W.: Developing a framework for meaningful use of personal health records (PHRs). Health Policy Technol. 3(4), 272–280 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heart, T., Ben-Assuli, O., Shabtai, I.: A review of PHR, EMR and EHR integration: a more personalized healthcare and public health policy. Health Policy Technol. 6(1), 20–25 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ozok, A.A., Wu, H., Gurses, A.P.: Exploring patients’ use intention of personal health record systems: implications for design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 33(4), 265–279 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dullabh, P., Sondheimer, N.K.E., Evans, M.A.: How patients can improve the accuracy of their medical records. eGEMs 2(3) (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonander, J., Gates, S.: Public health in an era of personal health records: opportunities for innovation and new partnerships. J. Med. Internet Res. 12(3), e33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Genitsaridi, I., Kondylakis, H., Koumakis, L., Marias, K., Tsiknakis, M.: Evaluation of personal health record systems through the lenses of EC research projects. Comput. Biol. Med. 59, 175–185 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weis, J.M., Levy, P.C.: Copy, paste, and cloned notes in electronic health records. Chest 145(3), 632–638 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chao, C.A.: The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: a narrative network analysis. Int. J. Med. Inf. 94, 100–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bushelle-Edghill, J., Brown, J.L., Dong, S.: An examination of EHR implementation impacts on patient-flow. Health Policy Technol. 6(1), 114–120 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rantanen, M.M.: Terveydenhuollon digitalisaatio sosioteknisestä näkökulmasta. Master’s thesis, Turku School of Economics (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dobson, J.: Understanding failure: The London Ambulance Service Disaster. In: Dewsbury, G., Dobson, J. (eds.) Responsibility and Dependable Systems, pp. 130–161. Springer, London (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., et al.: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144(10), 742–752 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kerns, J.W., Krist, A.H., Longo, D.R., Kuzel, A.J., Woolf, S.H.: How patients want to engage with their personal health record: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 3(7) (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kogut, S.J., Goldstein, E., Charbonneau, C., Jackson, A., Patry, G.: Improving medication management after a hospitalization with pharmacist home visits and electronic personal health records: an observational study. Drug Healthc. Patient Saf. 6, 1–6 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lau, A., Dunn, A., Mortimer, N., Proudfoot, J., Andrews, A., Liaw, S., Crimmins, J., Arguel, A., Coiera, E.: Consumers’ online social network topologies and health behaviours. In: Lehmann, C., Ammenwerth, E., Nøhr, C. (eds.) MEDINFO 2013. Volume 192 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Netherlands, pp. 77–81. IOS Press (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Massoudi, B.L., Olmsted, M.G., Zhang, Y., Carpenter, R.A., Barlow, C.E., Huber, R.: A web-based intervention to support increased physical activity among at-risk adults. J. Biomed. Inf. 43(5, Supplement), S41–S45 (2010). Project HealthDesignGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Park, H.S., Cho, H., Kim, H.S.: Development of a multi-agent m-health application based on various protocols for chronic disease self-management. J. Med. Syst. 40(1), 1–14 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Santos, C., Pedrosa, T., Costa, C., Oliveira, J.L.: Concepts for a personal health record. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 180, 636–640 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Markle Foundation: The personal health working group final report (2003). http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_articles/The_Personal_Health_Working_Group_Final_Report.pdf
  43. 43.
    Markle Foundation: Connecting Americans to their health care: A common framework for networked personal health information (2006). http://www.markle.org/sites/default/files/CF-Consumers-Full.pdf
  44. 44.
    Davidson, E.J., Østerlund, C.S., Flaherty, M.G.: Drift and shift in the organizing vision career for personal health records: an investigation of innovation discourse dynamics. Inf. Organ. 25(4), 191–221 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    International Organization for Standardization: ISO/TR 14639-2:2014(en) (2014). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:18638:ed-1:v1:en:te
  46. 46.
    Tang, P.C., Lansky, D.: The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff. 24(5), 1290–1295 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arens-Volland, A.G., Spassova, L., Bohn, T.: Promising approaches of computer supported dietary assessment and management—current research status and available applications. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84(12), 997–1008 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Valta, M.: Sähköisen potilastietojärjestelmän sosiotekninen käyttöönotto: seitsemän vuoden seurantatutkimus odotuksista omaksumiseen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business/Department of Health and Social Management (2013)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lyytinen, K., Hirschheim, R.: Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Scand. J. Manag. 4(1), 19–30 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Koskinen, J., Rantanen, M.M.: Discourse about governmental eHealth information systems—jargon, non-sense and quasi-rationality. In: Ethicomp 2018 (2018 in print)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems Science, Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations