Advertisement

Coherence Understanding Through Cohesion Markers: The Case of Child Spoken Language

  • Polina EismontEmail author
  • Vladislav Metelyagin
  • Elena Riekhakaynen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11096)

Abstract

Coherence and cohesion are crucial for organizing text semantics and syntax. They both may be described in terms of topic-focus structure, but the surface syntactic topic-focus structure does not coincide with that of deep semantics, and the automatic analysis of coherence which refers to the meaning of the whole text is complicated. The paper presents a Topic-Focus Annotating Parser (TFAP) that was trained on the corpus of Russian unprepared child oral narratives (213 narratives elicited by native Russian children aged from two years seven months to seven years six months). According to the results, children develop their narrative skills both in coherence and cohesion, but at the earlier stages of language acquisition, parsing errors reflect the speaker’s low level of narrative skills, while at the later stages (from five years seven months to seven years six months), when the basic rules of narrative organization are already acquired, parsing errors may be caused by the deficiencies of the parser. The topic-focus schemes we obtained support Leonid Sakharny’s theoretical approach to cognitive representation of coherence.

Keywords

Child language Topic-Focus Annotating Parser Cohesion Coherence Spoken narrative 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the research grant number 16-04-50114 (dir. P. Eismont) from the Russian Foundation for Humanities and the research grant number MК-6776.2018.6 (dir. E. Riekhakaynen) from the President of the Russian Federation.

References

  1. 1.
    Warner, N.: Methods for studying spontaneous speech. In: Cohn, A., Fougeron, C., Huffman, M. (eds.) Handbook of Laboratory Phonology, pp. 612–633. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Beaugrande, R., Dressler, W.U.: Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman, London, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murzin, L.N., Stern, A.S.: Text and Its Perception. UGU Press, Sverdlovsk (1991). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berman, R.A., Slobin, D.I.: Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manhardt, J., Rescorla, L.: Oral narrative skills of late talkers at ages 8 and 9. Appl. Psycholinguist. 23, 1–21 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frauenfelder, U.H., Peeters, G.: Lexical segmentation in TRACE: an exercise in simulation. In: Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, pp. 51–86. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matthews, P.H.: Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daneš, F.: Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In: Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, pp. 106–128. Academia, Prague (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Dijk, T.A.: Sentence Topic and Discourse Topic. http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Sentence%20topic%20and%20discourse%20topic.pdf. Accessed 02 May 2018
  10. 10.
    Sakharny, L.V.: Topic-focus structure in text: basic notions (in Russian). Lang. Lang. Behav. 1, 7–16 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hahn, U.: On Text Coherence Parsing. In: COLING, pp. 25–31 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nikolenko, S.I., Koltcov, S., Koltsova, O.: Topic modelling for qualitative studies. J. Inf. Sci. 43(1), 88–102 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ionov, M.I.: Automatic detection of the discourse status of a referent of a noun phrase. Rhema 4, 24–42 (2016). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassanali, Kh., Liu, Y., Solorio, Th. Coherence in child language narratives: a case study of annotation and automatic prediction of coherence. In: Third Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction (WOCCI 2012) ISCA. http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/wocci_2012. Accessed 24 June 2018
  15. 15.
    Kibrik, A.: Reference in Discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kibrik, A.A., Podlesskaya, V.I. (eds.): Stories about Dreams: Corpus-based Study of Russian Spoken Discourse. Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, Moscow (2009). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nigmatulina, J., Raeva, O., Riechakajnen, E., Slepokurova, N., Vencov, A.: How to study spoken word recognition: evidence from Russian. In: Anstatt, T., Gattnar, A., Clasmeier, Ch. (eds.) Slavic Languages in Psycholinguistics: Chances and Challenges for Empirical and Experimental Research, pp. 175–190. Narr Verlag, Tuebingen (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raeva, O.V., Riekhakaynen, E.I.: Spontaneous Russian texts from a listener’s perspective. Soc. Psycholinguist. Res. 3, 67–70 (2015). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eismont, P.M.: “KONDUIT”: Corpus of child oral narratives. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Corpus Linguistics – 2017”, pp. 373–377. Saint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg (2017). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ambridge, B., Rowland, C.F.: Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 4(2), 149–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kehler, A.: Discourse topics, sentence topics, and coherence. Theor. Linguist. 30, 227–240 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Götze, M., Weskott, Th., Endriss, C., Fiedler, I., Hinterwimmer, St., Petrova, Sv., Schwarz, A., Skopeteas, St., Stoel, R.: Information structure. In: Dipper, St., Götze, M., Skopeteas, St. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, vol. 7 of Working papers of the SFB 632, pp. 147–187. Universitätsverlag, Potsdam (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Korobov, M.: Morphological Analyzer and Generator for Russian and Ukrainian Languages. In: Khachay, M.Y., Konstantinova, N., Panchenko, A., Ignatov, D.I., Labunets, Valeri G. (eds.) AIST 2015. CCIS, vol. 542, pp. 320–332. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26123-2_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dyatchenko, P.V. et al.: Current state of the deeply annotated corpus of Russian texts (SynTagRus) (in Russian). In: Russian National Corpus: 10 Years of the Project. Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, pp. 272–299. Russian Language Institute, Moscow (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bamberg, M.: The Acquisition of Narratives: Learning to use Language. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Paducheva, E.V.: Communicative perspective interpretation: basic structures and linear-accentual transformations. Comput. Linguist. Intellect. Technol. 11(18), 522–535 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimmerling, A.V.: Thetic sentences: semantics and derivation (in Russian). In: Lyutikova, E.A., Zimmerling, A.V., Konoshenko, M.B. (eds.) Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters, vol. 1, pp. 223–252, M.A. Sholokhov MGGU, Moscow (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace InstrumentationSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations