Advertisement

The Prosody of Discourse Makers alors and et in French: A Corpus-Based Study on Multiple Speaking Styles

  • George ChristodoulidesEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11096)

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the prosodic characteristics of two French discourse markers (DMs), alors and et. Our study is based on a 8-h corpus covering 8 different speaking styles, with an average of 10 speakers per communicative situation. The tokens were classified depending on whether they are being used as discourse markers (DMs) or not; additionally in the case of et used as a conjunction, the type of the co-ordinated syntactic elements was identified. An automated prosodic analysis of all occurrences was performed. Results show that the use of et as a DM was more prevalent in non-planned speech; silent pauses preceded occurrences of alors and et, both as DMs and as non-DMs; the difference in silent pause duration, in the DM uses vs in the non-DM uses, was not statistically significant for alors and was statistically significant for et; DMs did not systematically constitute a separate prosodic unit; a strong prosodic boundary differentiates between the use of et as a DM or as a co-ordinating conjunction between verb phrases and subordinate clauses, and its other non-DM uses.

Keywords

Prosody Discourse markers Corpus linguistics French 

References

  1. 1.
    Carlson, K.: How prosody influences sentence comprehension. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3(5), 1188–1200 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christodoulides, G.: Praaline: integrating tools for speech corpus research. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), May 26–31, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 31–34 (2014). http://www.praaline.org
  3. 3.
    Christodoulides, G., Avanzi, M., Goldman, J.P.: DisMo: a morphosyntactic, disfluency and multi-word unit annotator. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), May 26–31, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 3902–3907 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christodoulides, G., Avanzi, M., Simon, A.C.: Automatic labelling of prosodic prominence, phrasing and disfluencies in French speech by simulating the perception of naïve and expert listeners. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 20–24 August 2017, Stockholm, pp. 3936–3940 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cutler, A., Dahan, D., van Donselaar, W.: Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Lang. Speech 40(2), 141–201 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Didirková, I., Christodoulides, G., Simon, A.C.: The prosody of discourse markers alors and et in French. A speech production study. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, Poznan (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Féry, C.: Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Key Topics in Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fraser, B.: What are discourse markers? J. Pragmat. 31, 931–952 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldman, J.P.: EasyAlign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 27–31 August 2011, Florence, pp. 3233–3236 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldman, J.P., Prsir, T., Christodoulides, G., Auchlin, A.: Speaking style prosodic variation: an 8-hour 9-style corpus study. In: Campbell, N., Gibbons, Hirst, D. (eds.) Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, pp. 105–109 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horne, M., Hansson, P., Bruce, G., Frid, J., Filipsson, M.: Discourse markers and the segmentation of spontaneous speech: the case of Swedish men ‘but/and/so’. Working Papers, Lund University, Department of Linguistics, vol. 47, pp. 123–139 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Komar, S.: The interface between intonation and function of discourse markers in English. Engl. Lang. Overseas Perspect. Enq. (ELOPE) 4(1–2), 43 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.4.1-2.43-55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mertens, P.: The Prosogram: semi-automatic transcription of prosody based on a tonal perception model. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 23–26 March 2004, Nara, pp. 549–552 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2017). https://www.R-project.org/
  15. 15.
    Schiffrin, D.: Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uygur-Distexhe, D.: Right peripheral discourse markers in SMS: the case of alors, donc and quoi. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Language Sciences and Metrology UnitUniversité de MonsMonsBelgium

Personalised recommendations