Skip to main content

Performing Astronomy: The Orrery as Model, Theatre, and Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Archaeology and Intermedial Performance

Part of the book series: Avant-Gardes in Performance ((AGP))

Abstract

This chapter presents a history of the orrery, from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, presenting it as an inherently theatrical device and establishing a picture of its evolution from a scale model into a performative space in its own right. Also, generically known as a “planetarium”, an orrery is a clockwork mechanism with balls of various sizes attached to copper arms made to scale that illustrate the relative positions of the celestial bodies. The prototype comes in many and often stunningly original forms ranging from elaborate machines mounted on stage and so-called human orreries to landscape installations and immersive environments specifically crafted for presenting performances. In all cases, the orrery articulates recurring questions that derive their substance from the human sense of place and perspective. Its history shows the importance of astronomical discoveries and demonstrations to our understanding of theatre and theatricality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: Rylandiana, Newman’s tribute to the Rev. Ryland in 1835, which includes the cards that were used during the performance. Here are two examples: “CARD 1: I represent the great Sun, the centre of light, heat, and attraction to all the planets. My diameter is 890,000 miles. I am above a million times bigger than the Earth and 540 times bigger than all the planets together. I turn round upon my axis in 25 days” (Newman 1835, 120); “CARD 12: I represent stupendous Saturn. My diameter is 78,000 miles. I move around the Sun in 29½ years, at a distance of 907,000,000 miles, and at the rate of 22,000 miles an hour” (ibid. 121).

  2. 2.

    See: www.parsnetwork.org. See Vanhoutte and Bigg (2014) on the precepts of PARS and the role of CREW’s embodied orrery. Also, for a conversation about CREW’s experimentations and experience of working on the borders between artistic practice, science and technological innovation for over a decade, see, in the same issue the interview with Eirini Nedelkopoulou.

  3. 3.

    According to Maaike Bleeker, who examined CREW’s Celestial Bodies in the context of digital media studies: “[T]hey show the universe itself as a phenomenon that cannot be disjoined from the generativity of the human–technology configurations in which the world and the universe get articulated in an ongoing, open-ended process” (Bleeker in Bigg and Vanhoutte 2017, 256).

  4. 4.

    Charlotte Bigg mentions a handbook written in 1934 by Jena teacher Otto Deinhardt and distributed by Zeiss that shows how “the human planetarium” was scheduled for school groups complementary to a visit to the planetarium: “Each age group was assigned different exercises, from drawing the constellations to measuring the height of the sun at different times of the year. Several of these exercises involved children embodying planets and re-enacting the motions of the solar system’s different bodies”. Accordingly, “schoolgirls were chosen according to size to embody the sun and the planets. They were made to pace along concentric orbits traced with chalk on the schoolyard. The ‘Planetenkinder’ demonstrated in a simple but effective manner that planets closer to the sun were quicker to complete one full circle” (Bigg in Bigg and Vanhoutte 2017, 214).

  5. 5.

    Some contemporary practices are described in an article in Astronomy Education Review, “The Human Orrery: A New Educational Tool for Astronomy” (Asher 2007).

  6. 6.

    For a state of the art report on embodiment theory and education, see Kiefer and Trumpp (2012).

  7. 7.

    Elkins and Morgan (2009), Josephson-Storm (2017).

  8. 8.

    On the phenomenology of this experience in CREW’s performances, see Vanhoutte and Wynants (2011): “In the shifting moment between the embodied and the perceived world, on the fracture between what one sees and what one feels, the distinction between live and mediated is blurred, moreover, can no longer be made. The perception of the body is pushed to the extreme, causing a most confusing corporal awareness, a condition that intensifies the experience and causes an altered sense of presence. In a dynamic cognitive negotiation, one tends, however, to unify the divergent ontologies of the ‘real’ and the ‘virtual’ to a meaningful experience” (275).

  9. 9.

    See: www.verenigdeplaneten.be

References

  • Aikin, Arthur. 1809. The Means of Finding the Longitude at Sea, Developed in Four Astronomical, Geographical, Nautical, Historical, Mathematical, and Mechanical Dissertations. By Major-General Grant, Viscount De Vaux. In Annual Review and History of Literature for 1808, vol. VII, 711–727. London: H. Bryer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1808. “The Eidouranion.” In The Monthly Mirror. Volume III, 275. London: J. Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1809. Science and Experimental Philosophy. In Annual Review, and History of Literature for 1808, 661–731. London: H. Bryer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1824. On the Astronomical Machine Called the Eidouranion: Or, Large Transparent Orrery. In The Glasgow Mechanics’ Magazine, and Annals of Philosophy, vol. I, 20–23. Glasgow: W.R. M’Phun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, David. 2007. The Human Orrery: A New Educational Tool for Astronomy. Astronomy Education Review 5 (2). https://aas.org/posts/2010/01/astronomy-education-review. Accessed 18 Mar 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigg, Charlotte, and Kurt Vanhoutte, eds. 2017. Spectacular Astronomy. Special Issue, Early Popular Visual Culture 15 (2): 115–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, Ben, and Lea Jacobs. 1997. Theatre to Cinema: Stage Pictorialism and the Early Feature Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crangle, Richard, Mervyn Heard, and Ine Van Dooren. 2005. Realms of Light: Uses and Perceptions of the Magic Lantern from the 17th to the 21st Century. London: Magic Lantern Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duro, Paul. 2010. ‘Great and Noble Ideas of the Moral Kind’: Wright of Derby and the Scientific Sublime. Art History 33 (4): 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, James, and David Morgan. 2009. Re-enchantment (The Art Seminar). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2008. The Transformative Powers of Performance: A New Aesthetics Trans. Saskya Iris Jain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henner, Mishka. 2011. Astronomical. Manchester: Artist’s book. Open edition, 130 sets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, John F.W. 1834. A Treatise on Astronomy. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1849. Outlines of Astronomy. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, Darius D., and Maria Virginia Swanson, eds. 2011. Publish Your Photography Book. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtamo, Erkki. 2011. Dismantling the Fairy Engine: Media Archaeology as Topos Study. In Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, ed. Erkki Huhtamo and Jussi Parikka, 27–48. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, William. 1784. The Description and Use of a New Portable Orrery. London: John Jones and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson-Storm, Jason A. 2017. The Myth of Disenchantment. Magic, Modernity and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Markus, and Natalie Trumpp. 2012. Embodiment Theory and Education: The Foundations of Cognition in Perception and Action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 1 (1): 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Henry C., and John R. Millburn. 1978. Geared to the Stars: The Evolution of Planetariums, Orreries, and Astronomical Clocks. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracauer, Siegfried. 1960. Theory of Film. The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, Ton. 2007. Filosofie van het landschap. Baarn: Ambo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Benjamin. 1771. The Description and Use of an Orrery of a New Construction, Representing in the Various Parts of its Machinery all the Motions and Phenomena of the Planetary System. London: Printed for, and Sold by the Author, and by the Booksellers in City and Country.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, John R. 1973. Benjamin Martin and the Development of the Orrery. British Journal for the History of Science 6 (4): 378–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molesworth, Jesse. 2015. The Cosmic Sublime: Wright of Derby’s A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery. In Lumen. Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 34, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, William. 1835. Rylandiana: Reminiscences Relating to the Rev. John Ryland, Father of the Late Rev. Dr. Ryland of Bristol. London: G. Wightman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt, Michael. 2008. Reflections in a Laserdisc: Toward a Cosmology of Cinema. In Mind the Screen: Media Concepts According to Thomas Elsaesser, ed. Jaap Kooijman, Patricia Pisters, and Wanda Strauven, 267–276. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryland, John. 1768. An Easy and Pleasant Introduction to Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy Containing the First Principles of Mechanics, Trigonometry, Optics, and Astronomy. 2nd ed. London: Edward and Charles Dilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Larry. 2013. Physics on Show: Entertainment, Demonstration and Research in the Long Eighteenth Century. In The Oxford Handbook for the History of Physics, ed. Jed Z. Buchwald and Robert Fox, 299–326. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoutte, Kurt, and Charlotte Bigg. 2014. On the Border Between Science, Performance and the Digital: The Embodied Orrery. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 10 (2): 255–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoutte, Kurt, and Nele Wynants. 2011. Performing Phenomenology: Negotiating Presence in Intermedial Theatre. Foundations of Science 16 (2–3): 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D.F. 1812. An Epitome of Astronomy with the New Discovered Planets, and the Late Comet, as Illustrated by the Eidouranion, or Large Transparent Orrery, Originally Invented by A. Walker and Lectured upon by His Son D.F. Walker. London: Wickham and Cutbush.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall-Romana, Christophe. 2015. Astronomy as Intermedia: 19th Century Optical Mobilism and Cosmopolitics. SubStance 138 (3): 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellbeloved, Horace. 1826. Mr. Walker’s Eidouranion, the Uranologia of Mr. Bartley. In London Lions, 1–11. London: William Charlton Wright.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Vanhoutte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vanhoutte, K. (2019). Performing Astronomy: The Orrery as Model, Theatre, and Experience. In: Wynants, N. (eds) Media Archaeology and Intermedial Performance. Avant-Gardes in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99576-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics