Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Governing Law Solutions to Ideal Laws

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Idealization and the Laws of Nature

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 investigates the potential for a theory of the metaphysics of ideal laws based around governing conceptions of lawhood. Three existing approaches are discussed: Armstrong’ theory of nomic necessitation, Cartwright’s capacity conception of laws, and Ellis’ theory of laws as essences of natural kinds. It is argued that none of these conceptions can provide a suitable explanation of the existence of ideal laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, D. 1983. What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, H. 2000. The non-governing conception of laws of nature. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXI (3): 571–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J. 1999. Scientific essentialism. In Causation and the laws of nature, ed. H. Sankey, 45–59. Dodrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. 1998. Dispositions and antidotes. The Philosophical Quarterly 48: 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. 2005a. The dispositionalist conception of laws. Foundations of Science 10: 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. 2005b. Laws and essences. Ratio 18: 437–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright. 1999. The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 1983. How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 2002. In favour of laws that are not Ceteris Paribus after all. Erkenntnis 57: 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. 1977. Laws of nature. Philosophy of Science 44: 248–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewery, A. 2001. Dispositions and Ceteris Paribus laws. British Journal for the Philosophy 52: 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. 2001. Scientific essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. 2002. The philosophy of nature: A guide to the new essentialism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B., and C. Lierse. 1994. Dispositional essentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1): 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forge, J. 1986. David Armstrong on functional laws. Philosophy of Science (53) 4: 584–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnassounou, B, and M Kistler. 2007. Dispositions and causal powers. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. 1954. Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, T. 2001. Dispositional essentialism and the possibility of a law-abiding miracle. The Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205): 484–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R., and E.H. Madden. 1975. Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttemann, A. 2007. Causation, laws and dispositions. In Dispositions and causal powers, ed. B. Gnassounou, and M. Kistler, 207–219. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttemann, A. 2014. Ceteris Paribus laws in physics. Erkenntnis 79: 1715–1728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttemann, A. 1998. Laws and dispositions. Philosophy of Science 65 (1): 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. 1999. All else being equal. Philosophy 74 (2): 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.B. 1994. Dispositions and conditionals. The Philosophical Quarterly 44: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. 2008. Cartwright’s realist toil: From entities to capacities. In Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science, ed. S. Hartmann, and C. Hoefer, 167–194. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, G. 2017. Abstract Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/abstract-objects.

  • Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinsons Universal Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, M. 2007. The metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus laws. Lancaster: Ontos-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. 2002. Ceteris Paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. Erkenntnis 57 (3): 351–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1977. Dispositional properties. Mind 86: 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, M. 1977. The nature of laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 77 (4): 667–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallentyne, P. 1988. Explicating lawhood. Philosophy of Science 55 (4): 598–613.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China

    Billy Wheeler

Authors
  1. Billy Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Billy Wheeler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wheeler, B. (2018). Governing Law Solutions to Ideal Laws. In: Idealization and the Laws of Nature. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99564-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation