Skip to main content

Above the Law: Securitisation in South Africa’s Migration Management Regime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Law and Migration in a Changing World

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 31))

  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

While South Africa’s 1998 progressive refugee legislation remains largely intact, the government’s reframing of migration as a security issue has resulted in a gap between law and policy as the government pursues security-based policy goals. The securitisation of migration includes a more expansive definition of who is an illegal migrant and a narrowed scope for obtaining legal migrant status. As a result, migrants and refugees are often unable to access the rights guaranteed to them by law. The actions of the relatively autonomous Department of Home Affairs are guided by securitisation goals at the expense of legal obligations, especially in the areas of asylum law and immigration detentions. Recent changes to the Immigration Act have also created barriers to migration for skilled and unskilled migrants alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Handmaker (2009), Crush and McDonald (2001).

  2. 2.

    Handmaker (2009).

  3. 3.

    Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (2017) ZACC 22.

  4. 4.

    Buthelezi (1997).

  5. 5.

    Comments by Deputy Trade and Industry Minister Elizabeth Thabethe at the National Small, Medium, and Micro Enterprises Summit, 2013, cited in ‘Foreign-owned businesses hampering rural growth – dti’ City Press (10 October 2013), available at https://www.news24.com/Archives/City-Press/Foreign-owned-businesses-hampering-rural-growth-dti-20150429, accessed 29 March 2018.

  6. 6.

    African National Congress (2012).

  7. 7.

    Mabuza and Dlamini (2015).

  8. 8.

    Magubane (2015).

  9. 9.

    See, e.g., Gastrow and Amit (2015).

  10. 10.

    African National Congress (2012).

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Comments by Maggie Maunye, Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee for Home Affairs, reported in A Makinana, ‘“Xenophobic” Committee Head Lashed’ The Star (30 June 2011), available at www.iol.co.za/news/politics/xenophobic-committee-head-lashed-1.1091179#.VPQ-23yUcrU, accessed 29 March 2018.

  13. 13.

    See, e.g., DHA (2010).

  14. 14.

    Nshimbi and Fioramonti (2013).

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Zimbabwean Documentation Project (2011).

  18. 18.

    African National Congress (2012).

  19. 19.

    There are two offices in Pretoria, but one provides only limited access for new applicants.

  20. 20.

    Although no plans have been made public, the Department has publicly referred to border ‘centres’ whose exact nature is unclear. At the DHA’s request, the Department of Public Works drew up plans for refugee camps.

  21. 21.

    Amit (2009, 2012b).

  22. 22.

    Amit (2010a, 2012a).

  23. 23.

    DHA, Asylum Matrix.

  24. 24.

    Although the government has stated that 95% of asylum seekers are economic migrants, more claims are rejected as unfounded than as manifestly unfounded.

  25. 25.

    DHA, Asylum Matrix.

  26. 26.

    LS v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) SGHC, unreported case no. 49231/10, Answering Affidavit, para 26.

  27. 27.

    Amit (2012c).

  28. 28.

    Ulde v Minister of Home Affairs (2009) (4) SA 522 (SCA).

  29. 29.

    The Refugees Act lays out a very narrow set of circumstances under which an asylum seeker can be detained, but never for the purposes of deportation.

  30. 30.

    Amit (2010b, 2012c).

  31. 31.

    KA v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) SGHC, unreported case no. 00189/2010, Supplementary Answering Affidavit, para 47.

  32. 32.

    Ibid. paras 27–29.

  33. 33.

    Mustafa Aman Arse v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) SGHC, unreported case no. 52898/09, Respondent Heads of Argument, para 35.

  34. 34.

    AS v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) SGHC, unreported case no. 101/2010.

  35. 35.

    The Act took effect in October 2015, following the publication of accompanying regulations.

  36. 36.

    See, e.g., Araia (2009), Elphick and Amit (2012).

  37. 37.

    DHA (2017).

  38. 38.

    George (2013).

  39. 39.

    Ibid.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

References

Laws

Cases

  • Abdi v Minister of Home Affairs (2011) (SCA) (3) SA 37 (15 February 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • AOL v Minister of Home Affairs (2006) (2) SA 8 (D)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arse v Minister of Home Affairs (2010a) (SGHC), unreported case no. 52898/09

    Google Scholar 

  • Arse v Minister of Home Affairs (2010b) (SCA) (7) BCLR 640 (12 March 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • AS v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) (SGHC) unreported case no. 101/2010 (12 January 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bula v Minister of Home Affairs (2012) (4) SA 560 (SCA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Child Law v Minister of Home Affairs (2005) (6) SA 50 (T).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs (2000) ZACC 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discovery Health Limited v CCMA (2008) 7 BLLR 633 (LC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg and Associates v Director General, Department of Home Affairs (2012) (3) SA 508 (WCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • HH & HH (2010) (SGHC) unreported case no. 00187/2010 (19 January 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsi v Minister of Home Affairs (2008) (WCHC) unreported case no. 16863/08 (22 October 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeebhai v Minister of Home Affairs (2009) (5) SA 54 (SCA).

    Google Scholar 

  • KA v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) (SGHC) unreported case no. 00189/2010 (19 January 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • KHA v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) (SGHC) unreported case no. 19262/10 (1 June 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiliko v Minister of Home Affairs (2006) (4) SA 114 (C).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larbi-Odam v Member of the Executive Council for Education (North-West Province) (1997) ZACC 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs (2004) (4) SA 125 (CC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (2017) ZACC 22

    Google Scholar 

  • LS v Minister of Home Affairs (2010) (SGHC) unreported case no. 49231/10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayongo v Refugee Appeal Board (2007) ZAGPHC 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister of Home Affairs v Watchenuka (2003) ZASCA 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndikumdavyi v Valkenberg Hospital (2012) ZALCCT 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pembele v Minister of Home Affairs (1996) (CPD) unreported case no. 15931/96 (10 December 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Somali Refugee Forum v Minister of Home Affairs (2005) (TPD) unreported case no. 32489/05 (November 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafira v Minister of Home Affairs (2006) ZAGPHC 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulde v Minister of Home Affairs (2009) (4) SA 522 (SCA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Garderen N.O. v Refugee Appeal Board (2007) (TPD) unreported case no. 30720/06 (19 June 2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amit, R. (2022). Above the Law: Securitisation in South Africa’s Migration Management Regime. In: Foblets, MC., Carlier, JY. (eds) Law and Migration in a Changing World. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99508-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99508-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99506-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99508-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics