Advertisement

Movement Analysis of Inhabitants in the Upper Silesia Agglomeration (Poland)

Conference paper
  • 222 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 844)

Abstract

Mobility preferences of residents of a specific area have a significant impact on the shaping of transport systems on a microscopic and macroscopic scale. Preference data is used to improve existing systems or design new ones that have an impact on improving the living standards of residents. This condition is one of the transport postulates. In order to present the analysis data on mobility preferences of the inhabitants of the Upper Silesian agglomeration were used.

Keywords

Transport systems Public transport Surveys Mobility behavior 

References

  1. 1.
    Macioszek, E., Lach, D.: Analysis of the results of general traffic measurements in the west pomeranian voivodeship from 2005 to 2015. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 97, 93–104 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macioszek, E., Czerniakowski, M.: Road traffic safety-related changes introduced on T. Kościuszki and Królowej Jadwigi Streets in Dąbrowa Górnicza between 2006 and 2015. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 96, 95–104 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macioszek, E.: The comparison of models for follow-up headway at roundabouts. In: Macioszek, E., Sierpiński, G. (eds.) Recent Advances in Traffic Engineering for Transport Networks and Systems. LNNS, vol. 21, pp. 16–26. Springer, Cham (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zawieska, J.: Inhabitants of Warsaw mobility preferences and behavior in the context of socio-economic transformations between 1993–2015. Transp. Miej. Reg. Ser. 3, 17–23 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniels, P., Warnes, A.: Movement in Cities. Routledge, England (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J., White, P.: The demand for public transport: the effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp. Policy 13, 295–306 (2006). Elsevier, HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janecki, R., Krawiec, S., Sierpiński, G.: Publiczny transport zbiorowy jako kluczowy element zrównoważonego systemu transportowego Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowskiej Metropolii Silesia. Urząd Miasta Katowice. Series I, pp. 105–132 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pucher, J., Kurth, S.: Verkehrsverbund: the success of regional public transport in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Transp. Policy 2, 279–291 (1995). Elsevier, HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Upper Silesian Conurbation According to the Central Statistical Office (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wyszomirski, O., Gromadzki, M.: Regular monitoring of public transport passengers’ behavior - Gdynia case study. In: Conference “Intelligent public transport”, Warsaw (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sierpiński, G., Celiński, I., Staniek, M.: Rejestracja zachowań komunikacyjnych w czasie rzeczywistym jako wsparcie organizacji i zarządzania transportem. Logistyka 3, 5273–5280 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of TransportSilesian University of TechnologyKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations