Advertisement

Influence of Geometry of Cylindrical Samples in the Mechanical Characterization of Existing Brickwork

  • Jorge Segura
  • Luca Pelà
  • Pere RocaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 18)

Abstract

The mechanical characterization of masonry is of paramount importance for the structural assessment of historical constructions against both vertical and horizontal actions. In particular, the compressive strength of masonry is normally regarded as a critical parameter for structural analysis. However, an accurate determination of the mechanical properties of masonry is a difficult task due to the complex and heterogeneous behavior of the material. The mechanical characterization of historical masonry is also hindered by the need to limit damage caused by inspection in culturally valuable buildings.

Recent researches and standards point to the possibility of estimating the compressive strength of existing brickwork by testing cylindrical samples of at least 150 mm diameter extracted from the brickwork walls. This work investigates the possibility of carrying out similar tests on smaller diameter cylinders. Using smaller cylinders may allow the extraction of a larger amount of samples and also permit the reduction of the extent of damage caused to the building.

This study presents a comparison between compression tests performed on 150 mm and 90 mm diameter cylindrical samples to evaluate the strength and stiffness of masonry consisting of lime mortar and clay bricks. The tests were carried out in the laboratory on samples extracted from masonry walls by using a dry core-drilling procedure and then regularized with high strength mortar caps. The experimental results show the relationship between the different geometries of core samples regarding strength values, failure modes and crack patterns. The study contributes to the application of experimental tests on cylindrical samples as a minor destructive technique to estimate the mechanical parameters of historical brickwork under compression.

Keywords

In-situ sampling Lime mortar Brickwork Masonry MDT Core sample Compressive strength Size effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the MINECO (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government) and the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through the MULTIMAS project (Multiscale techniques for the experimental and numerical analysis of the reliability of masonry structures, ref. num. BIA2015-63882-P). Support from Secretaria d’Universitats i Investigació de la Generalitat de Catalunya through a predoctoral grant awarded to the first author is also acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    UIC (1995) Leaflet 778-3R: Recommendations for the inspection, assessment and maintenance of masonry arch bridgesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brencich A, Sterpi E (2006) Compressive strength of solid clay brick masonry: calibration of experimental tests and theoretical issues. In: Lourenço PB, Modena C, Roca P, Agrawal S (eds) SAHC 2006 – Structural analysis of historical constructions. Macmillan India Ltd. pp 757–766Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the Tanaro bridge. Constr Build Mater 22:2087–2099.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matysek P (2016) Compressive strength of brick masonry in existing buildings – research on samples cut from the structures. In: Modena C, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (eds) Brick and block masonry – trends, innovations and challenges. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 1741–1747Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelà L, Roca P, Benedetti A (2016) Mechanical characterization of historical masonry by core drilling and testing of cylindrical samples. Int J Archit Herit 10(2–3):360–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1077906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pelà L, Canella E, Aprile A, Roca P (2016) Compression test of masonry core samples extracted from existing brickwork. Constr Build Mater 119:230–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pelà L, Canella E, Kasioumi K, et al (2016) Complete experimental characterization of lime mortar and clay brick masonry. In: Modena C, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (eds) Brick and block masonry – trends, innovations and challenges. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 1799–1806Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matysek P, Stryszewska T, Kanka S (2016) Experimental research of masonry compressive strength in the Auschwitz II - Birkenau former death camp buildings. Eng Fail Anal 68:263–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    CEN (2010) EN 459-1:2010 building lime - Part 1: definitions, specifications and conformity criteriaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    CEN (2011) EN 772-1:2011 methods of Test for Masonry units - Part 1: determination of Compressive StrengthGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DIN (1999) DIN 18555-9: 1999-09 testing of mortar containing mineral binders - Part 9: determining the compressive strength of hardened mortarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marastoni D, Pelà L, Benedetti A, Roca P (2016) Combining Brazilian tests on masonry cores and double punch tests for the mechanical characterization of historical mortars. Constr Build Mater 112:112–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pelà L, Kasioumi K, Roca P (2017) Experimental evaluation of the shear strength of aerial lime mortar brickwork by standard tests on triplets and non-standard tests on core samples. Eng Struct 136:441–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC - Barcelona Tech)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations