This chapter introduces a book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. Academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. The correction of the scholarly record for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. The chapter identifies different senses of the expression ‘correcting the scholarly record,’ discusses the integrity of authorship, outlines the purpose of academic publishing, and distinguishes post-publication from pre-publication responses to plagiarism.
KeywordsScholarly record Plagiarism Science Post-publication review Meta-science
- Anderson, Elizabeth, Leslie Francis, Heidi Grasswick, Miriam Solomon, and Lisa Tessman. 2017. Board of directors’ statement (May 18, 2017). Hypatia. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/np-board/non-profit-board-statement-may-18-2017. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Anonymous. 1990. Bad manners? Quadrant 34 (10): 65–69.Google Scholar
- ———. 2017. Editors’ statement (July 20, 2017). Hypatia. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/editor/editor-statement-july-20-2017. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- ———. 2018. Announcement from Hypatia’s board of directors and task force co-chairs. Hypatia, February 23. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/announcements/announcement-hypatias-board-directors-task-force-co-chairs. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Crama, Yves et al. 2006. Plagiarism. 40R: Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies. http://www.4or.be/Plagiarism.html. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Direction, La. 1997. Avis aux lecteurs. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 64 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
- Gipp, Bela. 2014. Citation-based plagiarism detection: Detecting disguised and cross-language plagiarism using citation pattern analysis. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.Google Scholar
- Hagen, Bill, and Tony VenGraitis. 2007. Appropriate use of the IEEE prohibited authors list. IEEE. https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/pubs/appropriate_use_of_pal.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Contributions to philosophy (from enowning). Trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2012. Contributions to philosophy (of the event). Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Horbach, S.P.J.M., and W. Halffman. 2017. The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’. Research policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.004. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Howard, Jennifer. 2011. After loss in court, scholar defends libel lawsuit over negative book review. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 11. http://www.chronicle.com/article/After-Loss-in-Court-Scholar/126720. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Jacobs, Jonathan D. 2012. History. Res Philosophica. http://www.resphilosophica.org/history. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Liptak, Adam. 2011. From a book review to a criminal trial in France. The New York Times, February 21. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/22/us/22bar.html. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Lu, Susan Feng, Ginger Zhe Jin, Brian Uzzi, and Benjamin Jones. 2013. The retraction penalty: Evidence from the web of science. Scientific Reports 3 (3146): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03146. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Maddox, John. 2017. John Maddox prize. Sense About Science. http://senseaboutscience.org/activities/2017-john-maddox-prize. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Marcus, Adam, and Ivan Oransky. 2017. Is there a retraction problem? And, if so, what can we do about it? In Oxford handbook of the science of science communication, ed. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan, and Dietram A. Scheufele, 119–126. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2012. Does peer review work as a self-policing mechanism in preventing misconduct: a case study of a serial plagiarist. In Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment, ed. Tony Mayer and Nicholas Steneck, 97–114. Toh Tuck Link: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
- Martin, Brian. 2016. Plagiarism, misrepresentation, and exploitation by established professionals: Power and tactics. In Handbook of academic integrity, ed. Tracey Bretag, 913–927. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, Lindsay. 2017. Journal’s board disavows apology for ‘transracialism’ article, making retraction unlikely. The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 18. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Journal-s-Board-Disavows/240116. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- McKenzie, Lindsay, Adam Harris, and Fernanda Zamudio-Suaréz. 2017. A journal article provoked a schism in philosophy: Now the rifts are deepening. The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 6. http://www.chronicle.com/article/A-Journal-Article-Provoked-a/240021. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Neale, Stephen. 2001. No plagiarism here. Times Literary Supplement, February 8.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, Mark. 2011. Debate over intelligent design ensnares a journal. The New York Times, May 13. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/14/us/14beliefs.html. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Oransky, Ivan. 2013. Doing the right thing: Scientists reward authors who report their own errors, says study. Retraction Watch. November 7. http://retractionwatch.com/2013/11/07/doing-the-right-thing-scientists-reward-authors-who-report-their-own-errors-says-study. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Pelikan, Jaroslov. 1992. The idea of the university: A reexamination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Quintanam, Chris. 2017. Here’s what academics are saying. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 5. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Heres-What-Academics-Are/239699. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- RePEc Plagiarism Committee. 2011. RePEc plagiarism offenders. Research Papers in Economics. https://plagiarism.repec.org/offenders.html. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Roig, Miguel. 2015. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. 2nd ed. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity. https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Rougier, Nicolas, and John Timmer. 2017. Ten simple rules for scientific fraud & misconduct. HAL-Inria Archive Ouverte. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01562601. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Scholz, S. J. 2017. Editor’s statement (May 6, 2017). Hypatia. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/editor/statement-editor-may-6-2017. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Schrenk, Lawrence P. 1989. Minutes of the 1989 executive council. Proceedings of the ACPA 63: 277.Google Scholar
- Schuessler, Jennifer. 2017. A defense of ‘transracial’ identity roils philosophy world. The New York Times, May 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/arts/a-defense-of-transracial-identity-roils-philosophy-world.html. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Sher, Gila, Otávio Bueno, and Wiebe van der Hoek. 2016. Statement from Synthese editors. Daily Nous: News for and About the Philosophy Profession, January 20. http://dailynous.com/2016/01/27/statement-from-synthese-editors-moratorium-on-special-issues. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Solomon, Miriam, Lisa Tessman, Leslie Francis, Heidi Grasswick, and Elizabeth Anderson. 2017. Board of directors’ statement (July 20, 2017). Hypatia. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/statements/board-directors-statement-july-20-2017. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Taylor, A.E. 1916. IX.—Correspondence. Mind 25 (4): 550–551.Google Scholar
- Timmins, Adam. 2013. Why was Kuhn’s Structure more successful than Polanyi’s Personal Knowledge? HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 306–317.Google Scholar
- Tudvad, Peter. 2007. SAK – an unscholarly biography of Kierkegaard. (Trans: M. G. Piety). The Torch. January. http://www.faklen.dk/english/engtudvad07-01.php. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Weiler, Joseph. 2010. Book reviewing and academic freedom. The European Journal of International Law 20 (4): 967–976.Google Scholar
- ———. 2011. In the dock, in Paris – The judgment. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/in-the-dock-in-paris-–-the-judgment-by-joseph-weiler-2. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Wolters, Eugene. 2014. I nonetheless deeply regret the incident. Critical Theory, July 12. https://goo.gl/pGS9jg. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Zamudio-Suaréz, Fernanda. 2017. Months after ‘transracialism’ flap, controversy still rages at feminist philosophy journal. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 21. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Months-After/240722. Accessed 6 July 2018.
- Zhang, Yuehong (Helen). 2016. Against plagiarism: A guide for editors and authors. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar