A.R.M. - Augmented Reality Muscularity

  • Dirk J. J. Sweere
  • Martin P. Hughes
  • Martijn G. van Laar
  • Lisa E. RomboutEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11112)


The theory of embodied cognition states that cognition is influenced by the body we inhabit. Research on embodiment illusions has confirmed that our perceived body affects our behavior and disposition. Virtual and augmented reality applications make the experience of ownership over a different body more accessible, but these virtual bodies are seldom fully utilized. Instead, the focus often lies on the scenario or the virtual surroundings. As an initial exploration of the effectiveness of embodiment illusions within the domain of exergaming, we embodied participants with a virtual muscular arm. Results show that weight perception is not directly affected by this manipulation. However, we theorize that body alterations like this might affect players’ motivation.


Augmented reality Virtual body Embodiment Experience design Exergaming Serious gaming Embodied cognition 


  1. 1.
    Wilson, M.: Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9(4), 625–636 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song, H., Kim, J., Lee, K.M.: Virtual vs. real body in exergames: reducing social physique anxiety in exercise experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 282–285 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, S.Y.S., Prestopnik, N., Biocca, F.A.: Body in the interactive game: how interface embodiment affects physical activity and health behavior change. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 376–384 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mellecker, R., Lyons, E.J., Baranowski, T.: Disentangling fun and enjoyment in exergames using an expanded design, play, experience framework: a narrative review. Games Health: Res. Dev. Clin. Appl. 2(3), 142–149 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peña, J., Khan, S., Alexopoulos, C.: I am what I see: how avatar and opponent agent body size affects physical activity among men playing exergames. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 21(3), 195–209 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, B.J., Lwin, M.O., Jung, Y.: Wii, myself, and size: the influence of proteus effect and stereotype threat on overweight children’s exercise motivation and behavior in exergames. Games Health: Res. Dev. Clin. Appl. 3(1), 40–48 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilteni, K., Bergstrom, I., Slater, M.: Drumming in immersive virtual reality: the body shapes the way we play. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(4), 597–605 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osimo, S.A., Pizarro, R., Spanlang, B., Slater, M.: Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud a virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Sci. Rep. 5, 13899 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellis, R.R., Lederman, S.J.: The golf-ball illusion: evidence for top-down processing in weight perception. Perception 27(2), 193–201 (1998). PMID: 9709451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ban, Y., et al.: Augmented endurance: controlling fatigue while handling objects by affecting weight perception using augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 69–78. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21(4), 373–387 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands feeltouch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669), 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Haans, A.: Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15(4), 455–464 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blanke, O., Metzinger, T.: Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13(1), 7–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Blanke, O.: First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS One 5(5), e10564 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., Blanke, O.: Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317(5841), 1096–1099 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schuemie, M.J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., Van Der Mast, C.A.: Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychology Behav. 4(2), 183–201 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biocca, F.: The Cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comput.-med. Commun. 3(2), JCMC324 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tamborini, R., Skalski, P.: The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In: Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, pp. 225–240 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosenberg, R.S., Baughman, S.L., Bailenson, J.N.: Virtual superheroes: using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PLoS One 8(1), e55003 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peck, T.C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S.M., Slater, M.: Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cogn. 22(3), 779–787 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Banakou, D., Groten, R., Slater, M.: Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(31), 12846–12851 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Riva, G., Baños, R.M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F., Gaggioli, A.: Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Front. Psychiatry 7, 164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., Quinn, D.M.: Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35(1), 4–28 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen, H.H.D., Ryan, A.M.: Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(6), 1314 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Annesi, J.J.: Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Percept. Mot. Skills 87(2), 723–730 (1998). PMID: 9842630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daniel, R., Ewald, M., Maiano, C.: Virtual reality and exercise: behavioral and psychological effects of visual feedback. Annu. Rev. Cybertherapy Telemed. 2011, 99 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Plante, T.G., Aldridge, A., Su, D., Bogdan, R., Belo, M., Kahn, K.: Does virtual reality enhance the management of stress when paired with exercise? An exploratory study. Int. J. Stress Manag. 10(3), 203 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lyons, E.J., Tate, D.F., Komoski, S.E., Carr, P.M., Ward, D.S.: Novel approaches to obesity prevention: effects of game enjoyment and game type on energy expenditure in active video games. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 6(4), 839–848 (2012). PMID: 22920810CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk J. J. Sweere
    • 1
  • Martin P. Hughes
    • 1
  • Martijn G. van Laar
    • 1
  • Lisa E. Rombout
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Tilburg UniversityTilburgNetherlands

Personalised recommendations