Abstract
Some creationist and anti-creationist publications feature ideal or exemplary persons. These persons are often fictitious literary creations, but sometimes they are real people who tell their stories. These invented or true stories exemplify important aspects of the groups’ positions and the conflict as it appears from their vantage point. For instance, creationists perceive that their entire society is morally damaged by the triumph of evolutionism. But this social damage is, ultimately, always suffered by individuals, and becomes apparent in their individual actions and stances. This means that the kind of social reform the creationists envisage also entails the personal repentance or conversion that comes with accepting creationism. It is not surprising, then, that there are creationist publications that depict the moral dimension of the reference question through the presentation of ideal or exemplary persons. Professional anti-creationists make use of such persons as well. In this chapter, three such persons from different groups are presented and compared to each other. In what situation do they find themselves? What kinds of problems do they encounter, and what solutions are suggested by the group that created them? What is their intellectual and emotional journey, and what is the conflict that surrounds and influences them? We will see that there exists a direct link between the position of the group and the exemplary person created by them. The persons are exemplary in that they experience the conflict the way the group does. They mirror the way the groups perceive themselves and their opponents in the field. Looking at exemplary persons helps answer the question as to what extent the groups perceive the conflict as based on questions of morality, institutional authority, or facts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An example of a creationist output that only makes use of real people is the film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (Frankowski 2008), which aims to show how scientists sympathetic with Intelligent Design are systematically discriminated against at their home academic institutions by the Darwinist establishment.
- 2.
- 3.
See Sect. 5.1.3.
- 4.
Answers in Genesis 2007.
- 5.
See Sect. 3.1.2.
- 6.
This is an important aspect of the „hyperreal“ depiction of religious and particularly Biblical content which characterizes the presentation of creationism in the Creation Museum. See Kelly and Hoerl 2012.
- 7.
See Chap. 7.
- 8.
See Sect. 7.1.
- 9.
See Sect. 8.1.
- 10.
See Sect. 6.4.2.
- 11.
- 12.
Romans 1:20.
- 13.
Focus on the Family 2008.
- 14.
Evans and Evans 2008.
- 15.
Dawkins 1989a.
- 16.
Section 8.2.
- 17.
See Chap. 6. To reiterate the point made there, this structural similarity does not mean that both positions are comparable regarding their content, or regarding the status of their views as scientific or religious.
- 18.
Baker 2006.
- 19.
Cf. the list of individuals and organizations that participated in the making of the book in Baker 2006, pp. 5–7.
- 20.
Baker 2006, pp. 10–11.
- 21.
Ibid.
- 22.
Baker 2006, p. 112.
- 23.
Ibid.
- 24.
Ebd., S. 152.
- 25.
See Sect. 4.2.2.
- 26.
See Sect. 6.3.2.
- 27.
See Sect. 6.4.
- 28.
See Sect. 3.1.
References
Answers in Genesis. (2007). Men in white. A creation museum special effects theater show. 1 DVD.
Baker, C. (2006). The evolution dialogues: Science, christianity, and the quest for understanding. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. (1998). The Wedge. O.O., o.V.
Dawkins, R. (1989a, April 9). Review of: Donald Johanson and Maitland Edey: Blueprint. Solving the Mystery of Evolution. The New York Times.
Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 87–105.
Evans, M. S., & Evans, J. H. (2010). Arguing against Darwinism. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to the sociology of religion (pp. 286–308). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Focus on the Family. (2008). The toughest test in college. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moVNwKHkTMo. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.
Frankowski, N. (2008). Expelled: No intelligence allowed. Rocky Mountain Pictures: Salt Lake City.
Kelly, C. R., & Hoerl, K. E. (2012). Genesis in Hyperreality: Legitimizing disingenuous controversy at the creation museum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 48, 123–141.
Morris, H. (1984). History of modern creationism. San Diego: Master Books.
Popitz, H. (2017). Phenomena of power: Authority, domination and violence. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaden, T. (2019). Creationist and Anti-Creationist Exemplar Constructs. In: Creationism and Anti-Creationism in the United States. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99380-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99380-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99379-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99380-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)