Abstract
A remarkable system of repression for several reasons. I. Internal coherence: interplay of differentiated sanctions aiming to break the previous alliances of social groups; financial profit given to the privileged in return for maintenance of order; formation of a third (neither military nor juridical) instance as (juridico-military) administrative instrument of the State, but basic lack of a specific apparatus of repression. II. Visible precariousness: differentiated arming (problems of bourgeois militias and popular arming), ruinous intervention by the army; drop in income from property as from tax levies; rent/taxes antinomy; bringing two contradictions into play. III. Resolution of the rent/taxes antinomy and stabilization of the army. From 1640, setting up of a new institution and distinct repressive apparatus within the State apparatus (intendants of justice, police and finance), acting as administrative tribunal and exceptional jurisdiction; establishment of a centralized and local police; a levy on the “dangerous population”, confinement and deportation. ~ Birth of the prison conjointly with birth of capitalism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burchell, G. (2019). six: 19 JANUARY 1972. In: Developing Global Leaders. Michel Foucault, Lectures at the Collège de France. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99292-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99292-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99291-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99292-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)